Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "adressspac".
Did you mean:
adressspace
2019 May 03
2
RFC: On removing magic numbers assuming 8-bit bytes
...teresting differences. The CHAR_BIT and byte
relation is established in the C standard and I would prefer the byte
terminology. It means the same thing as addressable unit but is a bit
shorter and probably more widely known.
Do you suggest any in-tree changes at some call sites using the
suggested AdressSpace parameter or would we rely on the default value
always? I could definitely include this, but if the parameter is never
used, perhaps we can leave it out-of-tree for now?
Best Regards,
Jesper
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 10:33 +0000, Jeroen Dobbelaere wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
> We (ASIP Designer...
2019 May 02
12
RFC: On removing magic numbers assuming 8-bit bytes
A. This RFC outlines a proposal regarding non-8-bit-byte support that
got positive reception at a Round Table at EuroLLVM19. The general
topic has been brought up several times before and one good overview
can be found in a FOSDEM 2017 presentation by Jones and Cook:
https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/llvm_16_bit/
In a nutshell, the proposal is for the llvm community