search for: adprep

Hello: I need to update the samba schema when I run the command: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I have this error: Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff Patched Sch51.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch51.ldf.diff Patched Sch57.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sc...

I have a very old domain i inherited that is running samba 4.5.6 but is on schema version 30. I added a windows 2003 DC and used the 2008r2 adprep.exe utility to upgrade the schema to version 47. To do so the 2003 server had to take the schema and infrastructure roles. I am now trying to use the repadmin utility to sync the schema back to samba to it is failing with the following: [2017/06/09 16:34:11.855939, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/repli...

root at pdc1-samba:/opt/adprep# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$(echo "DC=$(hostname -d)" | sed 's/\./,DC=/g')" -s base objectVersion | grep 'objectVersion' | awk '{print $NF}' 30 The scheme that this domain: 30 because it was a migration...

...e gone smoothly. As part of major release maintenance, I ran the following command on my schema master DC: > samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I get the following output: > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff > Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff > Patched Sch51.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch51.ldf.diff > Patched Sch57.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch57...

...As part of major release maintenance, I ran the following command on my schema master DC: > samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I get the following output: > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff > Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff > Patched Sch51.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch51.ldf.diff > Patched Sch57.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServ...

...; > Has anything changed with 4.8.0 with respect to replication with a Win2KR2 server? > > In particular, can Samba 4.8 join a Windows 2012R2 domain (schema 69) as a DC? Will replication work properly? > > Thank You! This should work fine. Additionally the new samba-tool domain adprep tool can help with the reverse, allowing 2012R2 DCs to join Samba domains after they are upgraded with that tool. (Sorry for missing that out of the release notes). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org S...

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 12:18 +0100, Pisch Tam?s wrote: > > Others have integrated Azure AD with Samba without the FL increase, > > and > > the key step would be the adprep work, > > Then I will do it without increasing the FL. What do I have to do > with adprep? To (prepare to) raise the domain functional level of an existing domain, after updating the smb.conf and restarting Samba run samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 samba-tool domain fun...

.... That seems unlikely, we won't have whatever is in that Volume Activation Services Role software. Even if that is just a client to AD (and it just puts enough stuff in AD to operate without any DRM?), you would need that around to set it up. But I guess it is worth a try, perhaps after the adprep patches are done (started at the end of last year) land which get the domain and forest prep stuff done, or if you adprep the Samba domain yourself. It will be an interesting ride... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, S...

...8 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 We are trying to add a Windows 2008 R2 domain controller. We follow https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2008_/_2008_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD. If we run dcpromo, it keeps asking us to run adprep on the Linux domain controller. Does anybody have any clue ? --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique --------------------------------------------

Doing some basic sanity checks on our Samba4 setup (migrating off of a Win2000/Win2003 AD) and the following command is throwing an error. Not sure how to troubleshoot this as most other things seem to be working. # samba-tool domain level show ERROR: Could not retrieve the actual domain, forest level and/or lowest DC function level! ... We are running the Sernet Samba package for Active

...es.md file. I then saved the file and ran the following command, which gave me the subsequent output: > > (as root) > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff > Exception in patch: b'patching file Sch50.ldf\nHunk #2 succeeded at 207 (offset -37 lines).\nHunk #3 FAILED at 277.\n1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Sch50.ldf.rej\n' > b'' > ERROR: Failed to upgrade schema > &...

...e you are > aware, plans can change), after that I am sure that 2016 will be added > as soon as possible. It depends on what you mean by 2012. We should be able to join and be joined by a 2012 server thanks to the work to upgrade the schema (patches in just some defaults to tweak) and the adprep stuff under samba-tool domain functionalprep However we can't be a 2012R2 functional level server yet, or in the near future, as we do not implement the kerberos features that implies. I'm still hoping to upgrade our Heimdal (perhaps SambaXP will help re- start that process) but that is o...

...Microsoft :-( > Our samba version is 4.7.5. OK, that is the current release. The last changes targeted at sharepoint where a couple of years ago. > I've been able to go one step further. We first were not able to join a Windows 2008 R2 as a domain controller because it was asking for adprep. > I found the missing datas in the ldap and added them. But know dcpromo fails replicating the configuration partition. > The most relevant error I can find in the dcpromo.log is : While it won't currently help you upgrade to forest level 2008R2 I will note for others that Samba 4.8 wil...

...Delfino Samba List wrote: > Rowland, > > I had the same thought. When I do that and try again, I get this message: > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff > Exception in patch: b'patching file Sch50.ldf\nHunk #2 succeeded at 209 (offset -35 lines).\n' > b'patch: **** unexpected end of file in patch\n' > ERROR: Failed to upgrade schema > > I feel like it's got to be some small s...

...blems with indexes ( as the user said ). We did not try with the current release and our manager wants to go back to Microsoft :-( Our samba version is 4.7.5. I've been able to go one step further. We first were not able to join a Windows 2008 R2 as a domain controller because it was asking for adprep. I found the missing datas in the ldap and added them. But know dcpromo fails replicating the configuration partition. The most relevant error I can find in the dcpromo.log is : Valeur de l’erreur principale : 8451 L’opération de réplication a rencontré une erreur dans la base de données. Valeur...

...domain has been migrated from Windows 2003 R2 so the AD schema revision is 31. However msDS-isRODC has been introduced in AD schema revision 33. When provisioning a new domain with samba 4.2.3, the AD schema revision is 47. Using .ldf files provided on the windows 2008 R2 install CD ( in support/adprep ), do you think it would be safe to try to upgrade the schema to revision 47 ? Christophe Borivant

...----- Mail original ----- De: "Christophe BORIVANT" <cborivant at devinlec.com> À: "Christophe BORIVANT" <cborivant at devinlec.com> Envoyé: Mardi 13 Février 2018 10:51:50 Objet: Re: [Samba] Is it possible to lower the domain and forest functional level Sorry I mean adprep instead of dcpromo. 2008 keeps asking for adprep when trying to promote it. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mai...

...Microsoft :-( > Our samba version is 4.7.5. OK, that is the current release. The last changes targeted at sharepoint where a couple of years ago. > I've been able to go one step further. We first were not able to join a Windows 2008 R2 as a domain controller because it was asking for adprep. > I found the missing datas in the ldap and added them. But know dcpromo fails replicating the configuration partition. > The most relevant error I can find in the dcpromo.log is : While it won't currently help you upgrade to forest level 2008R2 I will note for others that Samba 4.8 wil...

On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 17:43 -0400, Justin Foreman via samba wrote: > Doesn’t 2012R2 use WMI for the domain join? The adprep work provides a workaround for that, thankfully. > This may need some updating: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD> That would be great i...

...: Two domain controllers both running samba 4.7.6 - Ubuntu package Version: objectVersion: 44 (server 2008) According to samba docs, 'samba-tool domain schemaupgrade' only works from 2008 R2 version 47. For earlier it says: 'the ldf files must be manually sourced from the Windows adprep tool and run with the --ldf-file= option' Any recommendations / suggestions on how to do that? Right now there's no windows DC on the network. Thank you