search for: adminlinux

On 24/09/2020 12:47, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > I am using it on Fedora with Volume Definition looking like this: and I use this: <volume fstype="cifs" ??????? server="CIFS_SERVER_FQDN" ??????? path="linprofiles" ??????? mountpoint="/mnt/%(USER)" options="username=%(USER),uid=%(USERUID),gid=%(USERGID),domain=%(DOMAIN_NAME)"

...hare mount. > Sep 25 06:42:12 lws4 nmbd[538]: [2020/09/25 06:42:12.405936, ?0] > ../../source3/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:109(query_name_response) > > "tail -f /var/log/auth.log" ends with: > Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session > opened for user adminlinux by (uid=0) > Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: (rdconf1.c:401): libxml *detected a > syntax error *in /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml > Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 systemd-logind[502]: New session 79 of user > adminlinux. > Sep 25 06:37:34 lws4 sudo: (rdconf1.c:401): libxml *detected a sy...

...: Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full) These messages are not important to me. But these messages fill the log files, damaging the display of messages that could be important. Is there a way to send specific Dovecot errors on specific files or just discard them? Thanks -- Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

Hi, Does anyone here know a trusted package repository for Ubuntu LTS which has always the latest version of Dovecot? Thanks ! -- Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

Hi, I would like to take advantage of new features in Dovecot 2.2 on my servers. But I'm having difficulties to build packages for Ubuntu-12.04-LTS. Does anyone know a repository that has new stable versions for Dovecot and Pigeonhole ? Thanks ! --&nbsp; Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

Hi, I have a failover cluster for mail server with: Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem + Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox It works fine with ~50k accounts. My cluster design: http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to build an active/active cluster with load balancing. Can anyone direct me to some literature? A tutorial for example. I'm installing a cluster (for tests) with Ubuntu 14.04 + Ext4 filesystem (without Drbd) + Dovecot-...

...25 06:42:12 lws4 nmbd[538]: [2020/09/25 06:42:12.405936, ?0] >> ../../source3/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:109(query_name_response) >> >> "tail -f /var/log/auth.log" ends with: >> Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session >> opened for user adminlinux by (uid=0) >> Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: (rdconf1.c:401): libxml *detected a >> syntax error *in /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml >> Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 systemd-logind[502]: New session 79 of user >> adminlinux. >> Sep 25 06:37:34 lws4 sudo: (rdconf1.c:401): l...

...systemd[1]: Failed to mount dtshare mount. Sep 25 06:42:12 lws4 nmbd[538]: [2020/09/25 06:42:12.405936, 0] ../../source3/nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:109(query_name_response) "tail -f /var/log/auth.log" ends with: Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user adminlinux by (uid=0) Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 sshd[5799]: (rdconf1.c:401): libxml *detected a syntax error *in /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml Sep 25 06:37:29 lws4 systemd-logind[502]: New session 79 of user adminlinux. Sep 25 06:37:34 lws4 sudo: (rdconf1.c:401): libxml *detected a syntax error* in /etc/securit...

First, my use of IP addresses is a force of habit. User at shorthostname does work but, as I do not normally ssh with hostname. > adminlinux at lws2:~$ ssh tuser16 at lws4 > The authenticity of host 'lws4 (192.168.16.220)' can't be established. > ECDSA key fingerprint is > SHA256:iOPtH7sjCWWoWR/92nVv/fWIp0ogRtlHxeRTrC5EePI. > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > Warning: Permanently add...

...then only the Domain Member has the group option. But this is more how YOU want it. If you dont needed groups to control ssh logins from add, then you can leave them out. Its optional, only i do this so i can secure and controll some parts better. This is or can be a problem. sshgroup:x:998:adminlinux If you install as my howto's show, then root has no password and is not allowed to login. The first created user is always UID 1000, (minimal) The first user also is allowed to use sudo. And, kerberos sets : password [success=3 default=ignore] pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=1000 &...

...vers-ssh sshgroup? ? "apply the following" where???? There are 2, linux only Admin accounts, ( local accounts ) ? ?And, only if these are member of the "local group" sshgroup ? ?then your allowed to login. Not sure I understand here. I have a linux admin user named "adminlinux" (You do linuxadmin, I think) and of course 'root'. (I do not use root for any thing connected with AD.) What two (2) "linux only" admin accounts are you talking about??? The?2?accounts "You" setup to manage the system if your unable to login with a windows account....

...directory exists and everything seems to work fine. In my view, this indicates that the first sync is failing. In the first user access Dovecot creates home_dir for him. But the sync is not happening at this time to create the home_dir on the other node. My confs with doveconf -n: http://www.adminlinux.com.br/newcluster_doveconf.txt Thanks in advance! -- Thiago Henrique

Okay, now so I don't get confused. Yes, /home/WKDOM/tuser16 does exist on the client/workstation. root at lws4:~# getent group > root:x:0: > *..snipped for brevity..* > winbindd_priv:x:129: > sshgroup:x:998:adminlinux > postfix:x:130: > ..snipped for brevity.. > There is no servers-ssh group on the C/W. (I have a server-ssh group somewhere per Louis' instructions, just not on a C/W.) Should there be a servers-ssh group on a C/W? And notice that tuser16 is not a member of "sshgroup". On...

...t = 4190 ssl = no } inet_listener sieve_deprecated { address = _MY_IP_ port = 2000 ssl = no } ... } I think there is something wrong there but I don't know. I think Managesieve should not say "STARTTLS". Can someone help me? Thanks. -- Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

...t this server has an average of approximately 4k connections in state "idling". On other Dovecot servers the average connections in state "idling" is only 10%. My doveconf -n: http://thiagoh.prv.digirati.com.br/doveconf-n.txt Can someone help me? Thanks -- Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

...020 at 9:02 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 26/09/2020 14:52, Robert Wooden wrote: > > First, my use of IP addresses is a force of habit. User at shorthostname > > does work but, as I do not normally ssh with hostname. > > > > adminlinux at lws2:~$ ssh tuser16 at lws4 > > The authenticity of host 'lws4 (192.168.16.220)' can't be > established. > > ECDSA key fingerprint is > > SHA256:iOPtH7sjCWWoWR/92nVv/fWIp0ogRtlHxeRTrC5EePI. > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (y...

...e new emails delivered are also being duplicated. Doveadm deduplicate doesn't work for me. I ran: doveadm deduplicate -u <user> -m ALL Does do the migration of files with rsync was a mistake ? We are using mdbox on both clusters. My confs with doveconf -n for both clusters: http://www.adminlinux.com.br/newcluster_doveconf.txt http://www.adminlinux.com.br/oldcluster_doveconf.txt Thanks and regards, Thiago Henrique

...uot;. Could the '=' character be the reason? Despite my settings always worked: # doveconf auth_username_chars auth_username_chars = abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ01234567890.-_@= All opinions are welcome. Thanks! -- Thiago Henrique Em 16-05-2015 10:06, listas at adminlinux.com.br escreveu: > Hi, > > In a cluster with two servers and replication via dovecot-dsync, this > error is logged: > server1 dovecot: dsync-server(<user>): Error: Couldn't create lock > /var/lib/imap/user/6a/<user>/.dovecot-sync.lock: No such file or directory &gt...

On 26/09/2020 14:52, Robert Wooden wrote: > First, my use of IP addresses is a force of habit. User at shorthostname > does work but, as I do not normally ssh with hostname. > > adminlinux at lws2:~$ ssh tuser16 at lws4 > The authenticity of host 'lws4 (192.168.16.220)' can't be established. > ECDSA key fingerprint is > SHA256:iOPtH7sjCWWoWR/92nVv/fWIp0ogRtlHxeRTrC5EePI. > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > Warn...

Does Dovecot Director health monitoring of backend servers ? Or is poolmon (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051946.html) the best option for this? Maybe Ldirectord? Thanks! -- Thiago Henrique www.adminlinux.com.br