search for: administrator's

I guess you want getent group, so i give you both. But administrator is the only user of "domain admin" group with problems. [root at fileserver ~]# getent passwd Domain\ Admins [root at fileserver ~]# getent group Domain\ Admins domain admins:x:512: [root at fileserver ~]# ls -la /partages/share total 181260 drwxrwxrwx+ 2 root root 4096...

> So id administrator didn't return anything on DC or on Fileserver. ow.. but administrator on a DC should retun id 0 .. without any mappings. try setting or "authenticated users", or put "everybody" back on the share rights and test again. whats the primary group of the Administrator? Did...

Oh thank you Just to be sure to understand : -getent passwd | grep administrator and id administrator didn't work on Fileserver because administrator account didn't have uidNumber -it also why administrator account can't manage filserver with windows permissions Just one more thing please : Why my administrators group is mapped on unix users ? [root#fileserver...

Sorry for my mistake. It resolve the groupmap problem : [root at fileserver ~]# net groupmap list Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> BUILTIN\administrators Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> BUILTIN\users But i still have the administrator problem. I have follow the wiki.samba doc and i have set the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege : net rpc rights list accounts -U'DOMAIN\administrator' DOMAIN\Domain Admins SeDiskO...

I have a mapping beetween administrator and root on my fileserver, i sent you yesterday. My administrator account didn't have uid. I didnt have mapping or winbindd on my DC. The wiki says it's optional and i have separate my fileserver to my DC. So id administrator didn't return anything on DC or on Fileserver. My probleme...

Hi guys, I am working with Aurelien. On the DC, there is no UID/GID mapping (nsswitch not being modify as the wiki say that on a DC it's not needed). The primary group of Administrator is 513 (taken from the Attribute editor on ADUC) primaryGroupID : 513 (Domain Users) If i add Everybody to the Share tab, i can access to the security Tab and edit permissions. As he said the only user impacted with this is Administrator, we got 3 others accounts in the Domain Admins Group and the...

I still have the same problem with : [root at fileserver ~]# more /usr/local/samba/etc/samba_usermapping !root = DOMAIN\Administrator DOMAIN\\Administrator DOMAIN\administrator Administrator adm inistrator ________________________________________ De : samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> de la part de Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> Envoyé : jeudi 6 août 2015 16:06 À : samba at lists.samba.org Obj...

Hi sambalist, I'm using samba ad dc for about 2 years. I have 2 DCs and One file server. I didn't map the Administrator to root because the wiki said: "Mapping the domain administrator to the local root account is optional. Only configure the mapping if the domain administrator must be able to execute file operations on the domain member using root permissions. You should be aware that mapping Administrator to...

...ovision/__init__.py", > > line > > > > 298, in find_provision_key_parameters > > > > raise ProvisioningError("Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins rid > > (%s- > > > > %s" % (str(names.domainsid), security.DOMAIN_RID_ADMINISTRATOR)) > > samba.provision.ProvisioningError: ProvisioningError: Unable to find > > uid/gid for Domain Admins rid > > (S-1-5-21-855155194-824588496-1214258294-500 > > > > "Domain Admins" seems to be in "ad" > > Domain Admins may be in AD but that...

> > If you run getent passwd administrator on a DC, you should get > something like this: > root at dc1:~# getent passwd administrator > SAMDOM\administrator:*:0:10000::/home/administrator:/bin/bash On my DC getent passwd administrator show nothing. :( Is it necessary to map the root user to ADDC as well? There is however a got...

...etfacl -R -m g:Domain\ Admins:rwx share [root at fileserv]# getfacl share # file: share # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::rwx group:domain\040admins:rwx mask::rwx other::--- And now i gain access to the security tab with my Account, i can browse the share too. But if i go back with the Administrator Account to the ADUC, security is denied and he can't access the share "Access denied" smbstatus |grep myclientipwithadministratorlogin is giving me a process owned by root Thanks for help guys, it's been 4days that we are working on this... We can manage all things with the oth...

On 07/08/15 14:07, Aurélien Blachet wrote: > I guess you want getent group, so i give you both. But administrator is the only user of "domain admin" group with problems. OOPS, yes 'getent group Domain\ Admins' > [root at fileserver ~]# getent passwd Domain\ Admins > [root at fileserver ~]# getent group Domain\ Admins > domain admins:x:512: > > [root at fileserver ~]# ls -la...

On 07/08/15 13:25, Aurélien Blachet wrote: > Sorry for my mistake. > > It resolve the groupmap problem : > [root at fileserver ~]# net groupmap list > Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> BUILTIN\administrators > Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> BUILTIN\users > > But i still have the administrator problem. I have follow the wiki.samba doc and i have set the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege : > net rpc rights list accounts -U'DOMAIN\administrator' > DOMA...

...ber server and I now wish to grant the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege to the "MYDOMAIN\Domain Admins" group. When I execute the command it appears to disregard the domain name and grant the privileges to the group "Unix Group\domain admins" net rpc rights list accounts -U'MYDOMAIN\administrator' Enter MYDOMAIN\administrator's password: ... Unix Group\domain admins No privileges assigned net rpc rights grant 'MYDOMAIN\Domain Admins' SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -U'MYDOMAIN\administrator' Enter MYDOMAIN\administrator's password: Successfully granted rights. net rpc...

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member o...

On 07/08/15 09:37, Aurélien Blachet wrote: > Oh thank you > > Just to be sure to understand : > -getent passwd | grep administrator and id administrator didn't work on Fileserver because administrator account didn't have uidNumber If Administrator doesn't have a uidNumber, it will not be known to the Unix host, this is why you either have to give Administrator a uidNumber OR as you are doing, map Administrator to...

...tocreate5 = Junk autosubscribe = INBOX autosubscribe2 = Sent autosubscribe3 = Trash autosubscribe4 = Drafts autosubscribe5 = Junk quota = dict:user::file:/var/vmail/glu_vrem/%u/.quotausage } } > Users with non-standard quota in passwd-file: >>>>>>> administrator:*:95400500:95400513:Administrator:/home/DOM/administrator:/bin/bash::userdb_quota_rule=*:bytes=10G >>>>>>> userdb_mail=maildir:/var/vmail/glu_vrem/administrator/Maildir >>>>>>> administrator at email.dom:*:95400500:95400513:Administrator:/home/DOM/administr...

I have a small domain with a Samba PDB and two Windows clients. My goal is to have all accounts held centrally on the Linux box, but the administrator login doesn't work as an administrator. That is, I can login just fine as 'administrator' (or as any of the other accounts in the Samba password db), but I don't get administrative privileges in Windows. In smb.conf, I have: admin users = root username map = /etc/samba/smbusers...

Hello,     Using Samba 4.7.4 on 6 Ubuntu 14.04 as DC's. Recently noticed applications were failing to install on Windows 10 and 7 workstations. Started to investigate and noticed the Administrator account could not install software.  The Domain Admins appear to work as normal with full domain rights. As a test I logged in to a Windows 10 workstation as Administrator and invoked a command prompt with 'Run as Administrator'. Attempted to run 'ipconfig /registerdns' I get th...

Hi all am setting up a Forward Tunnel from one machine to another machine can anyone Guide me what this might be its degrading performance on a busy server load channel 968: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 969: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 973: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 975: open failed: