Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27531 matches for "administratively".
2015 Aug 07
4
Problems with administrator account
I guess you want getent group, so i give you both. But administrator is the only user of "domain admin" group with problems.
[root at fileserver ~]# getent passwd Domain\ Admins
[root at fileserver ~]# getent group Domain\ Admins
domain admins:x:512:
[root at fileserver ~]# ls -la /partages/share
total 181260
drwxrwxrwx+ 2 root root 4096 26 mars 2013 .
drwxr-xr-x 13
2015 Aug 07
2
Problems with administrator account
> So id administrator didn't return anything on DC or on Fileserver.
ow.. but administrator on a DC should retun id 0 ..
without any mappings.
try setting or "authenticated users", or put "everybody" back on the share rights and test again.
whats the primary group of the Administrator?
Did you leave it at "domain user" or did you change it to the
2015 Aug 07
2
Problems with administrator account
Oh thank you
Just to be sure to understand :
-getent passwd | grep administrator and id administrator didn't work on Fileserver because administrator account didn't have uidNumber
-it also why administrator account can't manage filserver with windows permissions
Just one more thing please :
Why my administrators group is mapped on unix users ?
[root#fileserver ~]# net groupmap
2015 Aug 07
2
Problems with administrator account
Sorry for my mistake.
It resolve the groupmap problem :
[root at fileserver ~]# net groupmap list
Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> BUILTIN\administrators
Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> BUILTIN\users
But i still have the administrator problem. I have follow the wiki.samba doc and i have set the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege :
net rpc rights list accounts -U'DOMAIN\administrator'
DOMAIN\Domain
2015 Aug 07
1
Problems with administrator account
I have a mapping beetween administrator and root on my fileserver, i sent you yesterday. My administrator account didn't have uid.
I didnt have mapping or winbindd on my DC. The wiki says it's optional and i have separate my fileserver to my DC.
So id administrator didn't return anything on DC or on Fileserver.
My probleme is that :
Administrator is a member of "domain
2015 Aug 07
0
Problems with administrator account
Hi guys,
I am working with Aurelien.
On the DC, there is no UID/GID mapping (nsswitch not being modify as the
wiki say that on a DC it's not needed).
The primary group of Administrator is 513 (taken from the Attribute editor
on ADUC) primaryGroupID : 513 (Domain Users)
If i add Everybody to the Share tab, i can access to the security Tab and
edit permissions. As he said the only user
2015 Aug 06
2
Problems with administrator account
I still have the same problem with :
[root at fileserver ~]# more /usr/local/samba/etc/samba_usermapping
!root = DOMAIN\Administrator DOMAIN\\Administrator DOMAIN\administrator Administrator adm
inistrator
________________________________________
De : samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> de la part de Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 6 août 2015 16:06
2019 Jun 03
2
How to fix mapping Administrator to root
Hi sambalist,
I'm using samba ad dc for about 2 years. I have 2 DCs and One file server. I didn't map the Administrator to root because the wiki said:
"Mapping the domain administrator to the local root account is optional. Only configure the mapping if the domain administrator must be able to execute file operations on the domain member using root permissions. You should be aware
2016 Feb 02
3
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote:
> > Hi at all,
> >
> > i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago
> > from an nt4-domain.
> >
> > By trying
> > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
> >
> > i get the
2017 May 30
2
member domain idmap config ad/rid
>
> If you run getent passwd administrator on a DC, you should get
> something like this:
> root at dc1:~# getent passwd administrator
> SAMDOM\administrator:*:0:10000::/home/administrator:/bin/bash
On my DC getent passwd administrator show nothing. :(
Is it necessary to map the root user to ADDC as well?
There is however a gotcha, on any domain
> joined windows machine there
2015 Aug 07
4
Problems with administrator account
Yes, LAN is the workgroup name.
I made a test, i removed all the ACL with setfacl -b mysharename
[root at fileserv]# getfacl share/
# file: share/
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::---
Going to Windows side and Added "Domain Admins" in permission tab to
read/modify/total
Security Tab is denied even for my others account in domain Admins group
looking again
2015 Aug 07
0
Problems with administrator account
On 07/08/15 14:07, Aurélien Blachet wrote:
> I guess you want getent group, so i give you both. But administrator is the only user of "domain admin" group with problems.
OOPS, yes 'getent group Domain\ Admins'
> [root at fileserver ~]# getent passwd Domain\ Admins
> [root at fileserver ~]# getent group Domain\ Admins
> domain admins:x:512:
>
> [root at
2015 Aug 07
0
Problems with administrator account
On 07/08/15 13:25, Aurélien Blachet wrote:
> Sorry for my mistake.
>
> It resolve the groupmap problem :
> [root at fileserver ~]# net groupmap list
> Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> BUILTIN\administrators
> Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> BUILTIN\users
>
> But i still have the administrator problem. I have follow the wiki.samba doc and i have set the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege
2016 Jan 19
2
net rpc rights list
I have sssd configured and working with my domain member server and I now
wish to grant the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege to the "MYDOMAIN\Domain Admins"
group. When I execute the command it appears to disregard the domain name
and grant the privileges to the group "Unix Group\domain admins"
net rpc rights list accounts -U'MYDOMAIN\administrator'
Enter
2017 May 30
2
member domain idmap config ad/rid
>
> Simple answer:
> Administrator, No
> Domain Admins, Yes
Ok. It was already that way.
root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group
...
domain admins:x:10004:
domain users:x:10000:
dap:x:10003:
dti:x:10001:
For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user
as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access
the security tab.
2015 Aug 07
0
Problems with administrator account
On 07/08/15 09:37, Aurélien Blachet wrote:
> Oh thank you
>
> Just to be sure to understand :
> -getent passwd | grep administrator and id administrator didn't work on Fileserver because administrator account didn't have uidNumber
If Administrator doesn't have a uidNumber, it will not be known to the
Unix host, this is why you either have to give Administrator a uidNumber
2017 Sep 11
1
Per-user quota (passwd)
Hi.
But there is one problem...
protocol lda {
mail_plugins = " quota autocreate sieve quota"
plugin {
quota = dict:user::file:/var/vmail/glu_vrem/%u/.quotausage
}
}
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = " quota autocreate autocreate imap_quota"
plugin {
autocreate = INBOX
autocreate2 = Sent
autocreate3 = Trash
autocreate4 = Drafts
autocreate5 =
2006 Jan 11
3
problem with administrator accounts
I have a small domain with a Samba PDB and two Windows clients. My
goal is to have all accounts held centrally on the Linux box, but the
administrator login doesn't work as an administrator.
That is, I can login just fine as 'administrator' (or as any of the
other accounts in the Samba password db), but I don't get
administrative privileges in Windows.
In smb.conf, I have:
2018 Jan 23
2
Administrator account lost administrative privileges
Hello,
Using Samba 4.7.4 on 6 Ubuntu 14.04 as DC's. Recently noticed
applications were failing to install on Windows 10 and 7 workstations.
Started to investigate and noticed the Administrator account could not
install software. The Domain Admins appear to work as normal with full
domain rights. As a test I logged in to a Windows 10 workstation as
Administrator and invoked a
2007 Jun 02
0
Channel setup
Hi all
am setting up a Forward Tunnel from one machine to another machine
can anyone Guide me what this might be its degrading performance on a
busy server load
channel 968: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
channel 969: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
channel 973: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
channel 975: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
channel 976: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
channel...