search for: adls

I'm doing some chi-square tests, and I recall some arbitrary rule that says each band must have at least 5 events in order for the test to be meaningful. Is there some way to do the banding automagically in R ? For instance, in the following survdiff, I'm trying to see if ADL affects survival. But when ADL=3,5 and 6, the number observed is too little. Anyway for me to tell R how to group

This has been bugging me for years but never got around to spending a lot of time on it until I now want/need to use it for work stuff. Problem is simple I get access denied when trying to create a file in a directory that is not owned by me or my primary group that doesn't have world writable permissions. Ive also had similar issues with NFS mounts where I can't move/create/delete files

Hi, I am trying to run ADL model by using auto.arima in package "forecast". I put two time series,x and xreg, in the formula, but got message: Error in nsdiffs(xx) : Non seasonal data. Any one can tell how to use it? Thanks Richard *************************************************************************************************** IMPORTANT: * This transmission is intended for the

Whether can any R package run Full modified OLS (Phillips and Hansen 1990 ), DOLS (Stock and Watson 1993) and ADL model (Pesaran and Shin 2001) for cointegrated VAR model? I cannot find any useful order in VAR and SVAR package. Thanks. Eric Wang [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi,I'm just wondering if there is any package for testing cointegration with ADL model. I saw a bunch of packages and list of email thread. There seemed to be no such a specific method. I am following this paper on how to test using ADL but I don't have a tool. http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/~hassler/ha-wo.pdfAny help would be really appreciated. Thank you.Taco [[alternative HTML

Hi all. I have recently signed up with a adsl supplier. I ordered static ip''s I was given a block from 153-158. I am trying to make it so that each machine gets a live ip address that is accessable on the wan. I am using floppyfw as my router on a p200. I know that I could setup the the eth0 as multiple ip''s and do nat, but I am wondering if there is another way. I just want

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: >>

In many places there is code that looks like: MBBI = next(MBBI); In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: llvm::next or std::next? I recommend: MBBI = llvm::next(MBBI); -Howard

Would anyone object to an attempt to improve cast<> error messages by outputting the expected type and the type received? The interface I'm thinking of is to use ADL to do visitor-style lookup, so we don't need to change every client. In particular, for clients in clang, we can just create these functions implicitly from our TableGen-generated files. I'm not sure about

Hi, i've two papers that could be listed on the LLVM publication page. http://www.llvm.org/pubs/ The first paper describes an architecture description language and LLVM back-end generation out of an ADL. The second paper describes a cluster VLIW back-end for LLVM 2.9, just before this VLIW initiative started for LLVM. Kind regards, Timo Stripf Stripf, T.; Koenig, R.; Becker, J.; , "A

On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Ahmed Charles wrote: > Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: > > The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. True. But when this code is compiled under C++0X you get an easy to diagnose, easy

On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:49 AMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >>> In many places there is code that looks like: >>> >>> MBBI = next(MBBI); >>> >>> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when

...ough information in the .td files to make a > > tool to automatically generate an assembler from them? Is a project > > like that in the works? > > your question is reasonable, but it is probably out of scope for LLVM. > There have been some architecture description languages (ADLs) > proposed for specifying a machine description and generating all > software development tools (for compilation down to object code and > for simulation) from there. A decent (and realistic) approach would > aim in generating binutils-specific source files for the basic tools > (as...

Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. There are also two issues with rvalue references and the STL: 1. EquivalenceClasses, in the insert and findLeader functions, it uses map functions

I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. Look for: using namespace llvm; Is that sufficient? Evan On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Howard Hinnant wrote: > In many places there is code that looks like: > > MBBI = next(MBBI); > > In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these > calls are made. And due to ADL

Evan Cheng wrote: > I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. Look for: > using namespace llvm; > > Is that sufficient? > No; once it's visible through ADL (because ilist<>::iterator extends std::iterator) there's no hiding or precedence mechanism we can exploit. On the other hand, AFAICT std::next is interchangeable with

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:49:42 -0800, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. > Look for: > using namespace llvm; > > Is that sufficient? > No. To prevent ADL from finding std::next, you need an explicitly qualified name at the call site. Sebastian

Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > >> "next" is a popular name; if it breaks llvm, I'd expect this standards change to break a lot of existing code. Do you really want to do that? >> > > I'm happy to open an LWG issue for you on this subject. Here are directions on submitting an issue: > >

I've just started looking into code generation and have a newbie question: Is there enough information in the .td files to make a tool to automatically generate an assembler from them? Is a project like that in the works? -Rich

...enough information in the .td files to make a tool to > automatically generate an assembler from them? Is a project like that > in the works? > > -Rich Hi your question is reasonable, but it is probably out of scope for LLVM. There have been some architecture description languages (ADLs) proposed for specifying a machine description and generating all software development tools (for compilation down to object code and for simulation) from there. A decent (and realistic) approach would aim in generating binutils-specific source files for the basic tools (as, ld, objdump at least) s...