search for: adhqksm0zpuhqpzhsclcypi

Hi, there! I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found anything. Anyone can help me? Thanks -- Fran Delgado (ThinWay) Tumblr: http://thinway.tumblr.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/thinway -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,

I was already aware if this in the first place :-) On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hi buddylove, > > In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading > which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between > multicast and unicast communications: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast >

you have 'a' doubt? precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously including shoutcast. read the docs! On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: > Hi, there! > I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. > I

On 04/05/2016 03:48 πμ, buddylove wrote: > you have 'a' doubt? > precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? > > this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. > runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously > including shoutcast. > read the docs! > > > > On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: >>

if you read ahead you'll figure that the infrastructure of the network 'en gros' isn't made for it (yet). because of this (and not just because I am a fan of) I propose other trials with overlay networks which could (under proper application) even be more efficient than the multicast protocol(s) itself. Greets and out Gee ... .-. . . On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

Hello: I hope someone can take a look at this and give me a little push to get me past this logjam. I've been running icecast + ices-0.4 + a perl application developed internally which runs an mp3 stream for a number of years. I am migrating my server from CentOS to ubuntu so I can upgrade to Perl 5.18 (so as to get clean unicode processing for another application.) I have installed