search for: adgroup

...list, I have created a local user "localuser" who is in the local group "localgroup" $ id uid=1001(localuser) gid=1001(localgroup) groups=1001(localgroup) My machine authenticates against Active Directory - works The AD-User "aduser" belongs to a domain group "adgroup" $ id uid=6161(aduser) gid=5513(dom?nen-benutzer) groups=5513(dom?nen-benutzer),10656(adgroup) I have mapped the local group and the adgroup with the command net groupmap add ntgroup="adgroup" unixgroup=localgroup rid=10656 type=d That works also # net groupmap list adgroup (S-1-5-...

...= 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes auth methods = winbind printcap name = cups printing = cups [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/IT browseable = no writable = yes inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes #valid users = @"ADGROUP+domain users" valid users = @"ADGROUP+domain test_access1" #create mode = 0664 #directory mode = 0775 [IT] comment = Home Directories path = /home/IT browseable = no writable = yes #valid users = @"ADGROUP+domain users" directory mode = 0775 valid users = @"ADGROUP+do...

Hi, We did a classicupgrade of our Ubuntu Server (4.3.11, TDB), the server DC5 also host shares. Post the migration we are seeing some permission issues. When trying to give permission to a domain group/user to folder/file we get the following chown "LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup" adtest/ chown: invalid user: 'LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup' wbinfo --ping-dc : checking the NETLOGON for domain[LIN] dc connection to "dc5.LIN.group" succeeded The getent group comes up with no results getent group "LIN\\adgroup" getent passwd "LIN\\mygroup&quo...

...lso this thing is working fine. What i want to do now is to grant the write permission in a directory to a local group composed by ADs users. I've defined the directory in smb.conf : [TEST] comment = TEST path = /samba/TEST browseable = No public = No read only = Yes write list = @ADGROUP and created the group : #groupadd ADGROUP but it's impossible to modify the AD user by using usermod for including him in my group : # usermod -G ADGROUP MYDOMAIN+myuser0 usermod: MYDOMAIN+myuser0 not found in /etc/passwd and this for me is almost clear, because if usermod search only in...

Hello, I'm bringing up a AD domain member server on RHEL 7.4 which provides packages with samba 4.6.2. I've joined the domain and cannot seem to get this command to provide a list of group members: getent group adgroupname what comes back is just adgroupname:x:gid: On another machine running RHEL 6.8, the same getent returns a full listing: adgroupname:*:gid:user1,user2,user3,etc id username does return a nice listing of all the groups a particular user is a member of. Any clues on what I might be missing here...

...rmap ]; then rm -f /tmp/ntfs-3g.usermap fi WBINFO=$(which wbinfo) if [ -z "${WBINFO}" ]; then echo echo "Cannot find 'wbinfo', is it installed?" echo "Cannot continue...Exiting" exit 1 fi ## Get users ADUSERS=$(${WBINFO} -u) ## Get groups ADGROUPS=$(${WBINFO} -g) while IFS= read -r line do SID=$(${WBINFO} -n "$line" | awk '{print $1}') echo "$line::$SID" >> /tmp/ntfs-3g.usermap done <<< "$ADUSERS" while IFS= read -r line do SID=$(${WBINFO} -n "$line" | awk '{print $1...

...a classicupgrade of our Ubuntu Server (4.3.11, TDB), the > server DC5 also host shares. Post the migration we are seeing some > permission issues. > > When trying to give permission to a domain group/user to folder/file > we get the following > > chown "LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup" adtest/ > chown: invalid user: 'LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup' > > wbinfo --ping-dc : checking the NETLOGON for domain[LIN] dc > connection to "dc5.LIN.group" succeeded > > The getent group comes up with no results > getent group "LIN\\adgroup" &...

...lassicupgrade of our Ubuntu Server (4.3.11, TDB), the server > DC5 also host shares. Post the migration we are seeing some permission > issues. > > When trying to give permission to a domain group/user to folder/file > we get the following > > chown "LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup" adtest/ > chown: invalid user: 'LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup' > > wbinfo --ping-dc : checking the NETLOGON for domain[LIN] dc connection > to "dc5.LIN.group" succeeded > > The getent group comes up with no results getent group "LIN\\adgroup" >...

...>> >> Does this question relates to the UIDs/GIDs on Samba AD DC (for >> domain users/groups) or local UNIX accounts (on file server, for >> example)? > > getent group lists only local groups; 'getent group' only shows local groups, whilst 'getent group adgroup' should show the info for the 'adgroup' > getent passwd shows list of local users, freezes for a while and exits; This is possibly because you may have (somehow) the same username in AD and /etc/passwd > id user shows user info if it exists locally. On an AD joined machine id...

I apologize if I'm going down the wrong avenue here... I have Samba/Winbind working to authenticate AD accounts to my Linux server. I can perform getent passwd ADUser and view the user credentials as well as using getent group ADGroup to view AD groups. When I modify /etc/group I can add ADUser to the file and the ADUser will have the security desired. However when I add an ADGroup to /etc/group it does not appear to work. My end goal is that instead of listing out several users on /etc/group on the wheel line, I would like...

Hi folks, Does anyone have a clue of how to by/pass the group scope value when creating a group in AD by using the net tools? I can delete an AD group, add/remove members from a group but I can't create a group. I reckon it's because of the group scope value (even Power Shell/New-ADGroup prompts for it) $ net -U $ADMIN_USER -S $DC_ADDRESS rpc group add $GROUP_NAME -c $OU Error message: Failed to add group $GROUP_NAME with error: Access is denied. Powershell command (that works fine with the same credentials): > New-ADGroup -Name $GROUP_NAME " -groupScope global -Path...

...shell-script you would set properties for users and groups using these two cmdlets and some foreach-logic looping over your search bases, users and groups: Set-ADUser -Identity $username -Replace @{uidNumber=$uid;gidNumber=$primary_group_gid;unixHomeDirectory=$homedir;loginShell=$login_shell} Set-ADGroup -Identity $groupname -Replace @{gidNumber=$gid} On 29 January 2015 at 21:24, Lars Hanke <debian at lhanke.de> wrote: > Am 29.01.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Tim: >> >> But if they take it away how to set them in future? > > > If you need NIS, you probably have POSIX systems...

...ing these two cmdlets and some >> foreach-logic looping over your search bases, users and groups: >> >> Set-ADUser -Identity $username -Replace >> >> @{uidNumber=$uid;gidNumber=$primary_group_gid;unixHomeDirectory=$homedir;loginShell=$login_shell} >> >> Set-ADGroup -Identity $groupname -Replace @{gidNumber=$gid} >> >> On 29 January 2015 at 21:24, Lars Hanke <debian at lhanke.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 29.01.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Tim: >>>> >>>> >>>> But if they take it away how to set them in...

I am sorry for many P.S. >> When domain user tries to access file server (samba4, member of AD domain) >> server logs such error: >> >> 2015/04/05 21:13:01.095178, 1] >> ../source3/auth/user_krb5.c:164(get_user_from_kerberos_info) >> Username DOMAINwusername is invalid on this system >> >> [2015/04/05 21:13:01.095200, 1] >>

...logic looping over your search bases, users and groups: >>>> >>>> Set-ADUser -Identity $username -Replace >>>> >>>> @{uidNumber=$uid;gidNumber=$primary_group_gid;unixHomeDirectory=$homedir;loginShell=$login_shell} >>>> >>>> Set-ADGroup -Identity $groupname -Replace @{gidNumber=$gid} >>>> >>>> On 29 January 2015 at 21:24, Lars Hanke <debian at lhanke.de> wrote: >>>>> Am 29.01.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Tim: >>>>>> >>>>>> But if they take it away how to...

...ba3.0.7 compiled with all relevant optins , winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o problems , getent * shows all like expected same for wbinfo The big problem remaining is , we want to restrict access to shares to given AD groups that way: valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADGROUP that doesnt work in any combination, the other way valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADUSERNAME works without any probem there is no user or groupmapping at all -----------------------output from level 10 log---------------------------------- 2004/10/21 17:16:44, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(533)...

...s , > winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o > problems , getent * shows all like expected > same for wbinfo > > The big problem remaining is , we want to restrict access to shares to > given AD groups that way: > > valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADGROUP > > that doesnt work in any combination, the other way > > valid users = @ADDOMAIN+ADUSERNAME > > works without any probem > > there is no user or groupmapping at all > > -----------------------output from level 10 > log---------------------------------- >...

On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 18:42:36 -0600 Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I decided to continue trying the ldap route as well > > littlehex2int() > { > hex=$1 > hex_chunk=$(echo ${hex}|cut -c$2-$3) > little=$(echo ${hex_chunk}|awk '{print > substr($0,7,2)substr($0,5,2)substr($0,3,2)substr($0,1,2)}') > echo "ibase=16; ${little}" |

...et properties for users and groups using these two cmdlets and some >foreach-logic looping over your search bases, users and groups: > >Set-ADUser -Identity $username -Replace >@{uidNumber=$uid;gidNumber=$primary_group_gid;unixHomeDirectory=$homedir;loginShell=$login_shell} > >Set-ADGroup -Identity $groupname -Replace @{gidNumber=$gid} > >On 29 January 2015 at 21:24, Lars Hanke <debian at lhanke.de> wrote: >> Am 29.01.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Tim: >>> >>> But if they take it away how to set them in future? >> >> >> If you need NIS,...

I'm hoping someone can give me a clue what I am doing wrong here, Running Debian Etch AMD64, I followed the samba wiki at: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_ <http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_&_Active_Directory#Prerequisites> &_Active_Directory#Prerequisites. I get mostly good results, except when I try to run 'getent passwd' or 'getent group' only