search for: addresult

...t just linking. You are right... BTW, I've just fixed that problem in my checkout and, among others terrible hacks, here I am: :\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm>HowToUseJIT.exe We just constructed this LLVM module: implementation ; Functions: int %add1(int %AnArg) { EntryBlock: %addresult = add int 1, %AnArg ; <int> [#uses=1] ret int %addresult } int %foo() { EntryBlock: %add1 = call int %add1( int 10 ) ; <int> [#uses=1] ret int %add1 } Running foo: Result: 11 D:\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm> Yabba! Yabba! Yabba!...

...d JIT compile it. I'm trying to take assembly and create machine code I can execute. How close am I ? Simon. int main() { Module *M = NULL; char *AsmString = "; ModuleID = 'test'\n\ \n\ implementation ; Functions:\n\ \n\ int %add1(int %AnArg) {\n\ EntryBlock:\n\ %addresult = add int 1, %AnArg ; <int> [#uses=1]\n\ ret int %addresult\n\ }\n\ "; M = ParseAssemblyString(AsmString, NULL); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new ExistingModuleProvider(M); ExecutionEngine* EE = ExecutionEngine::create(MP, false); std::cout << "We j...

...ixed that problem in my checkout and, among others > terrible hacks, here I am: > > :\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm>HowToUseJIT.exe > We just constructed this LLVM module: > > > implementation ; Functions: > > int %add1(int %AnArg) { > EntryBlock: > %addresult = add int 1, %AnArg ; <int> [#uses=1] > ret int %addresult > } > > int %foo() { > EntryBlock: > %add1 = call int %add1( int 10 ) ; <int> > [#uses=1] > ret int %add1 > } > > > Running foo: Result:...

...n"...Reading symbols for shared libraries .... done (gdb) r Starting program: /Users/lrz/src/llvm-26/Release/examples/HowToUseJIT Reading symbols for shared libraries +++. done We just constructed this LLVM module: ; ModuleID = 'test' define i32 @add1(i32 %AnArg) { EntryBlock: %addresult = add i32 1, %AnArg ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %addresult } define i32 @foo() { EntryBlock: %add1 = tail call i32 @add1(i32 10) ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %add1 } Running foo: Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason:...

MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared a struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain about that too. It's not just linking. On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:59:42 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > Hi all, > > Finally I managed to find

Hi, From the file HowToUseJIT.cpp, I learned how to insert some calcuation IR code like Add/Sub/Mul etc by using Instruction *Add = BinaryOperator::createAdd(One, ArgX, "addresult", BB); By following this way, it works well when I insert some IR code whose operand is integer type like IntTy, however, when I tried to insert similar thing whose operands are float point, I got the following message when I run it void llvm::BinaryOperator::init(llvm::Instruction::BinaryOp...

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Simon Burton wrote: > > Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code > without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? LLVM only needs llvm-gcc to translate from C/C++ to LLVM IR. If you already have code in LLVM IR form (e.g. because you're generating it on the fly or you have your own front-end) you don't need llvm-gcc. > I'd like to

Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> writes: > I'm trying to take assembly and create machine code I can execute. > How close am I ? Your test case is not complete. Besides, which version of llvm are you using? What are the commands for compiling and linking your test case? How it bombs? Do you #include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h" ? -- Oscar

...Block %arg = sub i32 %AnArg, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %fibx1 = tail call i32 @fib(i32 %arg) ; <i32> [#uses=1] %arg1 = sub i32 %AnArg, 2 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %fibx2 = tail call i32 @fib(i32 %arg1) ; <i32> [#uses=1] %addresult = add i32 %fibx1, %fibx2 ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %addresult } define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** nocapture %argv) nounwind { entry: %0 = getelementptr inbounds i8** %argv, i32 1 ; <i8**> [#uses=1] %1 = load i8** %0, align 4 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]...

Hi, all I found the example code examples/HowToUseJIT.cpp also shows the same error. Attachment is the LLVM module created by HowToUseJIT. And here is the error, Running foo: %X4<def> = LDtoc <ga:@add1>, %X2 UNREACHABLE executed! Stack dump: 0. Running pass 'PowerPC Machine Code Emitter' on function '@foo' Aborted Currently, I use gdb try to track down

Hi all, Finally I managed to find out a strange problem under Visual C During the link of the HowToUseJIT program, I was always missing some symbols... and I was going crazy testing out different options... At the end, unmangling the differences in what linker was searching and what was present in the libraries, I found that the problem is that we have something like this... Value.h struct

Hi, all I have a trouble with calling external functions on PowerPC. What I am doing is generating a LLVM IR first like this, - x86 call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !12 - ppc call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !10 After lowering above LLVM IR for x86 and ppc, it becomes: - x86 %RAX<def> = MOV64ri

...mbly/Parser.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h" #include <iostream> using namespace llvm; int main() { Module *M = NULL; char *AsmString = "; ModuleID = 'test'\n\ \n\ implementation ; Functions:\n\ \n\ int %add1(int %AnArg) {\n\ EntryBlock:\n\ %addresult = add int 1, %AnArg ; <int> [#uses=1]\n\ ret int %addresult\n\ }\n\ "; M = ParseAssemblyString(AsmString, NULL); std::cout << "verifyModule: " << verifyModule( *M ) << "\n"; ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new ExistingModulePro...

...= sub int %AnArg, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1] %fibx1 = call int %fib( int %arg ) ; <int> [#uses=1] %arg1 = sub int %AnArg, 2 ; <int> [#uses=1] %fibx2 = call int %fib( int %arg1 ) ; <int> [#uses=1] %addresult = add int %fibx1, %fibx2 ; <int> [#uses=1] ret int %addresult } --------- starting fibonacci(10) with JIT... Result: 55 I assume this is correct. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: win.diffs Type: application/octet-stream...

Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? I'd like to directly create executable code that i can stick in memory somewhere and jump into (call). (I'm looking to use llvm in a BSD licensed project). Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com

Like I said, it is in my path. That's not enough. I'd be happy if Morten chimed in with any suggestions as to how he got it to work. On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:45:18 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Two suggestions: > > 1. m4 might be located by your PATH variable. > 2. Talk to Morten Ofstad about how he got it to work. > > Reid. > > On

...y, 1); > > // Get pointers to the integer argument of the add1 function... > Value *ArgX = 0; // FIXME!! > > > // Create the add instruction... does not insert... > Instruction *Add = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, One, ArgX, > "addresult"); > > // explicitly insert it into the basic block... > BB->getInstList().push_back(Add); > > // Create the return instruction and add it to the basic block > BB->getInstList().push_back(new ReturnInst(Add)); > > // function add1 is rea...

...y, 1); > > // Get pointers to the integer argument of the add1 function... > Value *ArgX = 0; // FIXME!! > > > // Create the add instruction... does not insert... > Instruction *Add = BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, One, ArgX, > "addresult"); > > // explicitly insert it into the basic block... > BB->getInstList().push_back(Add); > > // Create the return instruction and add it to the basic block > BB->getInstList().push_back(new ReturnInst(Add)); > > // function add1 is rea...

...> > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(CallFibX2); > > > > } > > > > // Create the add instruction... does not insert... > > Instruction *Add = > > BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, > > CallFibX1, CallFibX2, "addresult"); > > > > // explicitly insert it into the basic block... > > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(Add); > > > > // Create the return instruction and add it to the basic block > > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(new ReturnInst(Add...

...ibF, Sub, "fib(x-2)"); > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(CallFibX2); > > } > > // Create the add instruction... does not insert... > Instruction *Add = > BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, > CallFibX1, CallFibX2, "addresult"); > > // explicitly insert it into the basic block... > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(Add); > > // Create the return instruction and add it to the basic block > exit_bb->getInstList().push_back(new ReturnInst(Add)); >...