search for: addresssafeti

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "addresssafeti".

Did you mean: addresssafety
2012 Jan 24
4
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi Kostya, > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive caused by > load widening] > > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), fixing > this bug may look as simple as this: I don't get the point of an attribute. There's plenty of code out there that does wide loads like this directly (without them being created by
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi, [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive caused by load widening] Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), fixing this bug may look as simple as this: --- lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp (revision 148708) +++ lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp (working copy) @@ -323,6 +323,14 @@
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:23:06AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Kostya, > > > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive caused by > > load widening] > > > > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), fixing > > this bug may look as simple as this: > > I don't get the point of an attribute.
2011 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
________________________________ From: Kostya Serebryany [kcc at google.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 2:46 PM To: Criswell, John T Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Criswell, John T <criswell at illinois.edu<mailto:criswell at illinois.edu>> wrote: Dear All, I think adding
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Kostya, > > > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive > caused by > > load widening] > > > > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), > fixing > > this bug may look as simple as this: > > Hi Duncan, >
2012 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi Kostya, > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > > Hi Kostya, > > > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive > caused by > > load widening] > > > > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Kostya, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr >> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kostya, >> >> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false >> positive >> caused by