Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "addresssafeti".
Did you mean:
addresssafety
2012 Jan 24
4
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi Kostya,
> [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive caused by
> load widening]
>
> Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), fixing
> this bug may look as simple as this:
I don't get the point of an attribute. There's plenty of code out there
that does wide loads like this directly (without them being created by
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi,
[resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive
caused by load widening]
Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch),
fixing this bug may look as simple as this:
--- lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp (revision 148708)
+++ lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp (working copy)
@@ -323,6 +323,14 @@
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:23:06AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Kostya,
>
> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive caused by
> > load widening]
> >
> > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch), fixing
> > this bug may look as simple as this:
>
> I don't get the point of an attribute.
2011 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
________________________________
From: Kostya Serebryany [kcc at google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 2:46 PM
To: Criswell, John T
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Criswell, John T <criswell at illinois.edu<mailto:criswell at illinois.edu>> wrote:
Dear All,
I think adding
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Kostya,
>
> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive
> caused by
> > load widening]
> >
> > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate patch),
> fixing
> > this bug may look as simple as this:
>
> Hi Duncan,
>
2012 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
Hi Kostya,
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Kostya,
>
> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive
> caused by
> > load widening]
> >
> > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate
2012 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] load widening conflicts with AddressSanitizer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Kostya,
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
>> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kostya,
>>
>> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false
>> positive
>> caused by