search for: addressably

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

Hello, I''m working with scaffold generated controller test code for handling GET requests. Address is the model being tested. Address belongs_to Company, Company has_many addresses. In my addresses_controller I have: before_filter :get_company def index @addresses = @company.addresses.find(:all) respond_to do |format| format.html # index.html.erb format.xml {

Hello, I have a form that submits data to two related models/tables. One is Customer the other is Address. Validation for Customer works fine but not for the Address. Class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :address validates_presence_of :login, :password, :email validates_associated :address end Class Address < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :customer validates_presence_of

Hi All, I need your suggestions for the following. I am still learning RoR and pardon my ignorance. I have say two tables. Table A : students Table B : addresses Table B has student_id as the foreign key to Table A If I am displaying the list of students and wanted to get individual students addresses based on their id, is the only option is to get the id from students controller method list

How does the libvirt deal with the vnet mac address? Greetings, if I establish a network for the VM (hypervisor is KVM) using bridge in the virt-manager , a vnet0 device is created . There are some relationships about mac address between the vnet0 device in the hypervisor and the ethX device in the VM, for example : the mac address of vnet0 is FE:54:00:84:E3:62 the mac address of ethX in the VM

I''m trying to figure out the Rails way to model the following problem: I have 2 tables. One (let''s call it location) contains a single address. The other (let''s call it company) contains 3 address. I''m trying to figure out the best way to model this. I''ve created an address table, a set up the model as follows: class Address <

Hi, Given the following R code: library(pryr) data <- array(dim = c(5)) for(x in 1:5) { data[x] <- as.integer(x * 2) } add = address(data) # save address of "data" for(x in 1:5) { data[x] <- as.integer(0) } if (add == address(data)) { print("Address did not change") }

On 04/27/2015 04:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:51:34AM +0800, wh.h@foxmail.com wrote: >> How does the libvirt deal with the vnet mac address? >> >> Greetings, >> if I establish a network for the VM (hypervisor is KVM) using bridge in >> the virt-manager , a vnet0 device is created . There are some relationships >> about mac

Hi David, ? Thanks for the correction concerning the "else" issue. ? Taking your code and removing some lines (to increase readability): ? library(pryr) ? data <- array(dim = c(5)) for(x in 1:5) { ?? data[x] <- as.integer(x * 2) } ? #print(data) ? add = address(data) for(x in 1:5) { ?? data[x] <- as.integer(0) } ? if (add == address(data)) { print("Address did not

Hi all, I'm currently struggling a bit with some problems regarding address spaces and (implicit) casts. I'll explain some context first and then proceed to the actual question I'd like to have answered. In our target platform, we have a number of distinctly different memory banks. To access these from our C code, we declare a global array for each memory, with the address space

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs at stdin.nl> wrote: > Now, we are using a function which reads a value from one of these memories > and does some processing. Since we want to execute this function for multiple > memories, we make it accept a pointer in the generic address space (ie, no > address space attribute): > > void do_stuff(char*

Hi, we run ctdb with samba on SLES11. It was running for some month ok but after an update of the system and ctdb it fails to run. I tried to setup a new ctdb setup on two other nodes and it still fails with the same error. After startup the status is: > ctdb status > Number of nodes:2 > pnn:0 10.94.43.7 DISABLED > pnn:1 10.94.43.8 DISABLED (THIS NODE) >

On 08/07/2015 12:22 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: > Sorry to be pedantic, but i think it's important to make sure we are > all on the same page that backends can't change the aliasing behavior > of the default address space, only the aliasing behavior of the other > address spaces. Are you saying that we can't say address space 0 doesn't alias other address

On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com> wrote: > On 08/07/2013 01:52 PM, Michele Scandale wrote: >> >> IMHO this information should be a plus that could be *safely* ignored when not necessary and used where it can provide an improvement in optimizations. This does not necessary mean the the middle-end (and the back-ends) must be aware of the

> [Micah Villmow] The backends won't understand your address space mapping. The backends should expose their address spaces that they support, their sizes and their overall semantics. It should be documented just like the calling convention is documented. It is then the job of the frontend to map whatever source language address spaces are used onto the correct address spaces for the

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:55:33PM -0500, Ken Dyck wrote: > The address space mechanism is used by some code generators to > differentiate between physical memory spaces. The PIC16 code generator > uses address spaces 0 and 1 to select between its RAM and ROM spaces. > And X86 uses address space 256 for GS and 257 for FS. In the back end > for a dual-harvard DSP that I've been

I am writing a backend for an experimental machine that has both 2-address and 3-address versions of some instructions. The 2-address versions are more compact and thus preferred when applicable. How does one go about generating the most compact version? 1. At instruction selection, is there a predicate that can test whether one of the input sources is dead, thus allowing the selection of the

Fixing llvm-dev at llvm.org to llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:27 AM Thomas Lively <tlively at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for your work on this, Paulo! > > Here's some more detail about how function pointers work today in the > WebAssembly backend and how they differ from the `funcref` Paulo is > working on. > > Today in the WebAssembly

I''ve tried tackling this many ways on my own and can''t find a good solution: Breaking it down to something simplier... Venue has one address Person has one address Address belongs to state Assuming I don''t want to do tables for venue_addresses and person_addresses. What is the best way to model this using rails... big thing here is i want to be able to reuse a