search for: address_types

I have the following polymorphic association set up with acts_as_relation (https://github.com/hzamani/acts_as_relation) Model code: class Email < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :detail validates_presence_of :address end class Detail < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_superclass has_many :emails accepts_nested_attributes_for :emails, allow_destroy: true

I would like to have a customer that has references to two addresses, a billing address and a shipping address. In a non-rails environment I would have two keys in the customers table, billing_address_id and shipping_address_id to reference the addresses. It appears that ActiveRecord expects the parent id to reside in the child table, regardless of whether the relationship is one-to-one or

...different purposes. It might be one of the tools that one `has already needed'." which, iiuc (?), can bidirectionally bridge the Dovecot unix-socket to a TCP socket that Exim can talk/listen to. reading further, "address types" (http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/doc/socat.html#ADDRESS_TYPES) seem to include BOTH unix & tcp sockets ... can anyone here comment further on this? known to work? possible? no way? etc etc thanks!

Hello, I posted a similar email, earlier in the week, but I still must not be getting it. I have a customer that aggregates two addresses; a shipping address and a billing address. Addresses can also be referenced by other objects in a similar way, so I would really like to avoid putting the keys referencing the customer or other objects in the addresses table. Addresses are exclusively

I am very confused about where to put the belongs_to and the has_one (and other relationship identifiers). I have read the RDoc and the agile book many times about this and I think i still see it backwards. Let me outline my app so you have an understanding... I have 2 tables: Schools { id, school_name, address_id } and Addresses { street1, street2, city, state, zip, country } *** this

In addition to an IR block id or probe Id, we’ll also need to know the inline context of a probe if it comes from an inlinee. The current pseudo probe encoding is based on a DFS walk of the inline tree. A MIR BB may contain probes from different inlinees, and we may need to extend the BB-info format for encode the inline contexts there. I’m happy to work with you on a encoding format that can be

Hi Rahman, Thanks for sharing the BB-info section proposal which is a shiny idea. I think the BB-info and pseudo probes deal with a similar problem in different spaces, i.e., mapping hardware samples to corresponding basic blocks. In the context of pseudo probes, we much focus on mapping samples back to source-level blocks which is the input to the optimizer. Therefore we are building a