search for: address_

Hello all, I understand that during PXE boot, it goes into the pxelinux.cfg and it states: 1. "it will search for the config file using its own IP address in upper case hexadecimal, e.g. 192.0.2.91 -> C000025B (you can use the included progam "gethostip" to compute the hexadecimal IP address for any host.) If that file is not found, it will remove one hex digit and try

...I get the following LLVM Code %a_addr = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %d = alloca i32* ; <i32**> [#uses=2] store i32 %a, i32* %a_addr store i32* %a_addr, i32** %d, align 4 how can I generate such an Instruction? When I use name = variables.inst[i]->getName() + "address_"; Instruction *AD = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, ConstantInt::get(Type::Int32Ty, 1), name, alloca_point); StoreInst *SI = new StoreInst(variables.inst[i], AD, alloca_point); StoreInst(SI, GEP, alloca_point); the compiler is happy, but I get the following error at run time: Instructions.cpp...

...66 10.16.96.148.5036 > 10.16.96.149.5036: udp 37 (DF) [tos 0x10] 17:37:00.957994 10.16.96.149.5036 > 10.16.96.148.5036: udp 37 (DF) [tos 0x10] ............................................................................. But un the gatekeeper communication process I only see packets in one address_ namor:/home/sanz# tcpdumpatm -n -i atm0 tcpdumpatm: listening on atm0 17:56:13.659867 80.98.102.206.10004 > 80.98.105.178.1720: S 1165965604:1165965604(0) win 18280 <mss 9140,sackOK,timestamp 4428183360,nop,wscale 0> (DF) 17:56:13.660000 80.98.105.178.1720 > 80.98.102.206.10004: S421...

...%a */, ptr_a_addr, false, label_4); StoreInst* void_6 = new StoreInst(ptr_a_addr, ptr_d, false, label_4); void_5 is putting the argument %a into the locally allocated %a_addr. void_6 is taking %a_addr and storing it into %d. > When I use > > name = variables.inst[i]->getName() + "address_"; > Instruction *AD = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, > ConstantInt::get(Type::Int32Ty, 1), name, alloca_point); > StoreInst *SI = new StoreInst(variables.inst[i], AD, alloca_point); > StoreInst(SI, GEP, alloca_point); > That looks wrong. The last line, "StoreInst(SI, GEP...

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > > do that and keep

> The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > do that and keep track of things, I need to know that the vector of > pairs is

...d_debug_level; * sure the page is locked and that nobody else uses it - or that usage * is safe. The caller must hold a write_lock on the mapping's tree_lock. */ -void __remove_from_page_cache(struct page *page) +void inline __remove_from_page_cache_nocheck(struct page *page) { struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping; @@ -127,6 +127,28 @@ void __remove_from_page_cache(struct pag mapping->nrpages--; __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_PAGES); } + +void __remove_from_page_cache(struct page *page) +{ + /* + * Check if the discard fault handler already removed + * the pa...

...d_debug_level; * sure the page is locked and that nobody else uses it - or that usage * is safe. The caller must hold a write_lock on the mapping's tree_lock. */ -void __remove_from_page_cache(struct page *page) +void inline __remove_from_page_cache_nocheck(struct page *page) { struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping; @@ -127,6 +127,28 @@ void __remove_from_page_cache(struct pag mapping->nrpages--; __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_PAGES); } + +void __remove_from_page_cache(struct page *page) +{ + /* + * Check if the discard fault handler already removed + * the pa...

Greetings, after Carsten pitched CMM2 on the kvm mini summit here is a repost of version 5 of the guest page hinting patches. The code is still the same but has been adapted to the latest git level. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Greetings, after Carsten pitched CMM2 on the kvm mini summit here is a repost of version 5 of the guest page hinting patches. The code is still the same but has been adapted to the latest git level. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

After way to many months here is the fifth version of the guest page hinting patches. Compared to version four a few improvements have been added: - Avoid page_host_discards() calls outside of page-states.h - The discard list is now implemented via the page_free_discarded hook and architecture specific code. - PG_state_change page flag has been replaced with architecture specficic

After way to many months here is the fifth version of the guest page hinting patches. Compared to version four a few improvements have been added: - Avoid page_host_discards() calls outside of page-states.h - The discard list is now implemented via the page_free_discarded hook and architecture specific code. - PG_state_change page flag has been replaced with architecture specficic