search for: addr4

...*addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&addr_6or4; + + /* Detect IPv4 in IPv6 mapped address and convert it to */ + /* plain (AF_INET) IPv4 address */ + if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(&addr6->sin6_addr)) { + struct sockaddr_in *addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)&addr_6or4; + struct in_addr addr; + u_int16_t port; + + memcpy(&addr, ((char *)&addr6->sin6_addr) + 12, sizeof(addr)); + port = addr6->sin6_port; + +...

...ler br label %Return, !dbg !244 Return: ; preds = %Resume, %CheckFree ret i8* undef, !dbg !244 When CoroSplit creates the destroy function for this coroutine, it generates this: call fastcc void %2(%Allocator* %0, %"[]u8"* byval %.reload.addr4), !dbg !296 unreachable How did that unreachable get there? What happened to my code above to resume or return to the caller? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180228/c7ff15bb/attachment.htm...

Hi Kirill, just to notify you that your al175 driver is being removed from the NUT tree, as of 2.4.0-pre1. if you wish to see it entering the tree again, please contact the Development mailing list to talk about it. Merry Christmas and happy New Year. Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -

...;',m.member_company_name as ''Company'' , `department` as ''Department'',`title` as ''Job Title'', `addr1` as ''Business Street'', `addr2` as ''Business Street1'',`addr3` as ''Business Street2'',`addr4` as ''Business Street3'', `address_city` as ''Business City'',`address_state` as ''Business State'',`address_postalcode` as ''Business Postal Code'',c.c_name as ''Business Country'' ,'''' as '...

...he same thing remains an >> open question for GlobalISel. > > I don't get this problem. > GISel has a sequential IR, the order is already modeled here. %t1 = load %addr1 :: (load 4 from @a) %t2 = load %addr2 :: (load 4 from @a + 4) store %t1 %addr3 :: (store 4 to @b) store %t2 %addr4 :: (store 4 to @b + 4) MIR specifies the order: load @a -> load @a+4 -> store @b -> store @b+4 but the dependencies are actually: load @a -> store @b load @a+4 -> store @b+4 We only have a representation of the former at the moment and have to re-calculate the latter each time w...

Hi all! The following files emits warnings when compiled with gcc 4.0: al175.c bcmxcp_ser.c belkinunv.c cyberpower.c everups.c powercom.c solis.c All warnings seem to be of this variety: everups.c:38: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'ser_get_char' differ in signedness I suggest that those who fiddles with those drivers fixes the warnings and verifies that it works

...;> >> I don't get this problem. >> GISel has a sequential IR, the order is already modeled here. >> >> >> %t1 = load %addr1 :: (load 4 from @a) >> %t2 = load %addr2 :: (load 4 from @a + 4) >> store %t1 %addr3 :: (store 4 to @b) >> store %t2 %addr4 :: (store 4 to @b + 4) >> >> MIR specifies the order: >> load @a -> load @a+4 -> store @b -> store @b+4 >> but the dependencies are actually: >> load @a -> store @b >> load @a+4 -> store @b+4 >> >> We only have a representation of the...

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:48:51PM +0200, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote: > [ CCed all people who were involved in this thread ] > > Hi Tom, > > personally, I am interested to test the prebuilt-toolchains for > Ubuntu/xenial alias 16.04 LTS and Debian/Jessie v8.5.0 AMD64. > The available toolchains are incomplete and thus useless. > > Just as a fact: There is still no

Hi all, Over the past few months we’ve been doing work on the foundations for the next stages of GlobalISel development. In terms of changes from this time last year, the IR translator, the legalizer, and instruction selector have seen moderate to major changes. The most significant of these was the change to the legalizer API, allowing targets to use predicates to express legality, which gives