search for: addr2

...s. This is more towards the database design for the scenario below: Say for example, I have a person table and this person can have different address types. One could be Home and the other could be say Office. Should be model this Table people id fname lname Table addresses id person_id addr1 addr2 .... or Table people id fname lname Table addresses id addr1 addr2 Table persons_addresses person_id address_id Are there any tutorial that explains these concepts? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks Silvy Mathews -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment...

...roller does not scroll the form at all, the cursor moves to next field OK, but I never get to see the off scrollwindow fields. If I enter some data, then Tab, the scroller functions and the next fields are displayed. Thanks ============================================== #!/usr/bin/env ruby # zestaddr2.rb # Generated by RubyFXGen.rb Ver 0.9a on :Mon Sep 01 17:20:31 +1000 2008 # plus added code to setup scroller require ''fox16'' include Fox class MainWindow < FXMainWindow def initialize(app) super( app, ''Zest Address Entry'') self.width = 422 self.height =...

Dear list, I have a data frame of survey respondents, a little like this: set.seed(20081215) n <- 100 dat <- data.frame(id=1:100, addr1=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr2=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr3=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE)) head(dat) id addr1 addr2 addr3 1 1 R H Q 2 2 H C K 3 3 I P S 4 4 A H L 5 5 P Q P I wish to detect potential duplicates in the data fra...

Hi, I have a question about redirecting message to a multiple addresses. I have an user script like following: require ["copy"]; redirect :copy "addr1 at dom.ain"; redirect :copy "addr2 at dom.ain"; All works fine, but if addr1 at ... has exceeded quota, this script seems stop working and addr2 at ... doesn't receive this message too. Is this correct behaviour? How to avoid this? Thanks, Kryol

...ng to VMs between mailboxes. If in a multi-tenancy environment one uses custom contexts ie. [a1-ext1](a1) mailbox=101 at a1 and the associated voicemail.conf entry: [a1] 101 => 1234,My User 1,addr1 at email.com,,tz=eastern|imapuser=addr1 at email.com|imapfolder=Inbox 102 => 1234,My User 2,addr2 at email.com,,tz=eastern|imapuser=addr2 at email.com|imapfolder=Inbox now if a message is left in mailbox 101 and the user attempts to forward the message to mailbox 102 Asterisk responds that mailbox 102 is not found in context default! One can add: searchcontexts=yes but that means each mailb...

...2 data; }; static inline struct hwsq_reg +hwsq_stride(u32 addr, u32 stride, u32 mask) +{ + return (struct hwsq_reg) { + .sequence = 0, + .force = 0, + .addr = addr, + .stride = stride, + .mask = mask, + .data = 0xdeadbeef, + }; +} + +static inline struct hwsq_reg hwsq_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) { return (struct hwsq_reg) { .sequence = 0, .force = 0, - .addr = { addr1, addr2 }, + .addr = addr1, + .stride = addr2 - addr1, + .mask = 0x3, .data = 0xdeadbeef, }; } @@ -29,7 +46,14 @@ hwsq_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) static inline struct hwsq_reg hwsq_reg(u32 addr) { - retu...

...pagefaults and preemption are disabled. - * * Can be invoked from any context. * * Requires careful handling when nesting multiple mappings because the map * management is stack based. The unmap has to be in the reverse order of * the map operation: * - * addr1 = kmap_atomic(page1); - * addr2 = kmap_atomic(page2); + * addr1 = kmap_local_page(page1); + * addr2 = kmap_local_page(page2); * ... - * kunmap_atomic(addr2); - * kunmap_atomic(addr1); + * kunmap_local(addr2); + * kunmap_local(addr1); * * Unmapping addr1 before addr2 is invalid and causes malfunction. * @@ -88,10 +86,26 @@...

...s of whether this is a masked load or something else. Note that the x86 backend already does this, so either my proposal is ok for x86, or we're already doing an illegal optimization: define <4 x i32> @load_bonus_bytes(i32* %addr1, <4 x i32> %v) { %ld1 = load i32, i32* %addr1 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32* %addr1, i64 3 %ld2 = load i32, i32* %addr2 %vec1 = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %ld1, i32 0 %vec2 = insertelement <4 x i32> %vec1, i32 %ld2, i32 3 ret <4 x i32> %vec2 } $ ./llc -o - loadcombine.ll ... movups (%rdi), %xmm0 retq...

...sserts that something can be assumed "no alias" if the access size of an memory access (i.e. a load or store) is bigger than the underlying object of the other accessed object. For you example below: V1Size = sizeof(mydata) V2Size = say 4 assuming that GetUnderlyingObject for addr1 and addr2 returns mydata: getObjectSize(O1) = sizeof(mydata) getObjectSize(O2) = sizeof(mydata) this should be isObjectSmallerThan(O2, V1Size) == false isObjectSmallerThan(O1, V2Size) == false ?? > > In llvm, the "object pointed to by ptr p" seems to take on two meanings. Suppose th...

...tensions.conf: exten => _XXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem0/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem1/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Busy exten => _XXXX,n,Hangup in FaxDispatch: FILETYPE=pdf case "$CALLID4" in 1000) SENDTO=addr1 at sample.com 1001) SENDTO=addr2 at sample.com *) SENDTO=blackhole at sample.com esac according to some documentations i've found $CALLID4 should have the DID info. but in fact it's blank. any idea? -- Edwin Lam <edwin.lam at officegeneral.com> Systems Engineer, Office General, Inc. Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fa...

...umed "no alias" if the access size of an memory access (i.e. a load or store) is bigger than the underlying object of the other accessed object. > > For you example below: > > V1Size = sizeof(mydata) > V2Size = say 4 > > assuming that GetUnderlyingObject for addr1 and addr2 returns mydata: This assumption is wrong. The GetUnderlyingObject() return phi node instead of &mydata. > > getObjectSize(O1) = sizeof(mydata) > getObjectSize(O2) = sizeof(mydata) > > this should be > isObjectSmallerThan(O2, V1Size) == false > isObjectSmallerThan(O1, V2Si...

...e the postgresql connection . >> class D < ActiveRecord::Base >> end => nil >> D.set_table_name "users" => nil >> D.column_names => ["id", "name", "fname", "lname", "password", "addr1", "addr2", "city", "state", "email", "created", "gender"] >> D.reset_table_name => "ds" >> D.set_table_name "orders" => nil >> D.column_names => ["id", "name", "fname", &quot...

...n(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h index 0f57fcf..04e3849 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ramfuc_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) }; } -static inline struct ramfuc_reg +static noinline struct ramfuc_reg ramfuc_reg(u32 addr) { return ramfuc_reg2(addr, addr); -- 2.0.0.526.g5318336

...Following is the real example I'm investigating where the "object" take on meaning b) leads to miscompilation. ----------------------------------------- struct { T1* p1, T2 *p2, int xyz} mydata; addr1 = phi(&mydata, &mydata); // all operands have same value. addr2 = phi(&mydata.xyz, &mydata.xyz); memcpy(addr1, ... sizeof(mydata)) // mem1 = load addr2->syz // mem2 -------------------------------------------------------- ( But for the phi node, getUnderlyingObject() would return "mydata" as "obj...

...something else. > > Note that the x86 backend already does this, so either my proposal is ok > for x86, or we're already doing an illegal optimization: > > > define <4 x i32> @load_bonus_bytes(i32* %addr1, <4 x i32> %v) { > %ld1 = load i32, i32* %addr1 > %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32* %addr1, i64 3 > %ld2 = load i32, i32* %addr2 > %vec1 = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %ld1, i32 0 > %vec2 = insertelement <4 x i32> %vec1, i32 %ld2, i32 3 > ret <4 x i32> %vec2 > } > > $ ./llc -o - loadcombine.ll > ......

Patch 1 fixes nva3 bailing due to not finding the right ramcfg Patch 2 is a resend rebased on 3.17.0-rc4 for setting the vblank period Patch 3-5 handle writes to per-partition registers, for which NVA3 does not have special broadcast regs available. Patch 6 removes local structs from NVA3 reclocking in favour of the already existing "ram->base." variables, like in NVE0 As always,

Hi I have a list. Two of the elements of this list are "Name" and "Address", both of which are character vectors. Name and Address are linked, so that the same "Name" always associates with the same "Address". What I want to do is pull out the unique values, as a new list of the same format (ie two elements of character vectors). Now I've worked out

...pagefaults and preemption are disabled. + * + * Can be invoked from any context. + * + * Requires careful handling when nesting multiple mappings because the map + * management is stack based. The unmap has to be in the reverse order of + * the map operation: + * + * addr1 = kmap_atomic(page1); + * addr2 = kmap_atomic(page2); + * ... + * kunmap_atomic(addr2); + * kunmap_atomic(addr1); + * + * Unmapping addr1 before addr2 is invalid and causes malfunction. + * + * Contrary to kmap() mappings the mapping is only valid in the context of + * the caller and cannot be handed to other contexts. + * + * On...

The problem is that we use the ordering private, global, constant and local, and this is the same ordering that is used on Apple as well. As we already have OpenCL binaries out in public, making the change is problematic as we want to keep backward compatibility at all costs. Thanks, Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: Anton Lokhmotov [mailto:Anton.Lokhmotov at arm.com] > Sent:

On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:05 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the definition of object for @llvm.objectsize, it is identical to gcc's __builtin_object_size(). So it's not wrong; it's just the way it was defined to be. > > Regarding the BasicAA's usage of these functions, I'm unsure. It seems to me that isObjectSmallerThan()