search for: addr1

What''s the difference between these two? Objective: Trying to display the addresses of the students that has "has_many" relations with addresses <td><% @student.addresses.each {|address| "Address: #{address.addr1}<br/>"} %> </td> ****** did not work <% end %> This code worked: <td><% @student.addresses.each do |address|%> <%= address.addr1 %><br/> <% end %> Any comments appreciated. Thanks Silvy Mathews

Dear list, I have a data frame of survey respondents, a little like this: set.seed(20081215) n <- 100 dat <- data.frame(id=1:100, addr1=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr2=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr3=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE)) head(dat) id addr1 addr2 addr3 1 1 R H Q 2 2 H C K 3 3 I P S 4 4 A H L 5 5 P Q...

...u''re iterating through a block, you don''t need to have an end. In fact it should give you some kind of error. Secondly, <% just evals a statement, <%= renders the output. So your loop should be: <td><%= @student.addresses.each {|address| "Address: #{address.addr1}<br/>"} %> </td> Pat On 1/27/06, Silvy@funmail.com <Silvy@funmail.com> wrote: > What''s the difference between these two? > Objective: > Trying to display the addresses of the students that has "has_many" > relations with addresses > &g...

...ent code then when I use the source directly. In both cases I'm compiling with -O4. Can anyone explain this? Thanks define i32 @somefunc(i32 (i32)* %ptr) nounwind uwtable { entry: %ptr.addr = alloca i32 (i32)*, align 8 store i32 (i32)* %ptr, i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr, align 8, !tbaa !0 %ptr.addr1 = bitcast i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr to i8* call void @llvm.var.annotation(i8* %ptr.addr1, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([11 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([51 x i8]* @.str1, i64 0, i64 0), i32 13) %0 = load i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr, align 8, !tbaa !0 %cmp = icmp eq i32 (i32)*...

...to this. This is more towards the database design for the scenario below: Say for example, I have a person table and this person can have different address types. One could be Home and the other could be say Office. Should be model this Table people id fname lname Table addresses id person_id addr1 addr2 .... or Table people id fname lname Table addresses id addr1 addr2 Table persons_addresses person_id address_id Are there any tutorial that explains these concepts? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks Silvy Mathews -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attac...

...mask; u32 data; }; static inline struct hwsq_reg +hwsq_stride(u32 addr, u32 stride, u32 mask) +{ + return (struct hwsq_reg) { + .sequence = 0, + .force = 0, + .addr = addr, + .stride = stride, + .mask = mask, + .data = 0xdeadbeef, + }; +} + +static inline struct hwsq_reg hwsq_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) { return (struct hwsq_reg) { .sequence = 0, .force = 0, - .addr = { addr1, addr2 }, + .addr = addr1, + .stride = addr2 - addr1, + .mask = 0x3, .data = 0xdeadbeef, }; } @@ -29,7 +46,14 @@ hwsq_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2) static inline struct hwsq_reg hwsq_reg(u32 addr...

...|LAYOUT_FILL_Y) fld3= FXDataTarget.new("") FXTextField.new(addr,20, fld3, FXDataTarget::ID_VALUE, FRAME_SUNKEN|LAYOUT_FILL_X|LAYOUT_FILL_Y) fld3.connect(SEL_COMMAND) do puts "fld3 contains #{fld3.value}" main.setPosition(-30, -30) end FXLabel.new(addr, "Addr1" , nil,LABEL_NORMAL|LAYOUT_FILL_X|LAYOUT_FILL_Y) addr1= FXDataTarget.new("") FXTextField.new(addr,20, addr1, FXDataTarget::ID_VALUE, FRAME_SUNKEN|LAYOUT_FILL_X|LAYOUT_FILL_Y) addr1.connect(SEL_COMMAND) do puts "addr1 contains #{addr1.value}" main.setPosition...

...lements annotations on local variables, that's all. Ciao, Duncan. > > Thanks > > define i32 @somefunc(i32 (i32)* %ptr) nounwind uwtable { > entry: > %ptr.addr = alloca i32 (i32)*, align 8 > store i32 (i32)* %ptr, i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr, align 8, !tbaa !0 > %ptr.addr1 = bitcast i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr to i8* > call void @llvm.var.annotation(i8* %ptr.addr1, i8* getelementptr > inbounds ([11 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds > ([51 x i8]* @.str1, i64 0, i64 0), i32 13) > %0 = load i32 (i32)** %ptr.addr, align 8, !tbaa !0 >...

...have is whether it is legal to read the extra memory, regardless of whether this is a masked load or something else. Note that the x86 backend already does this, so either my proposal is ok for x86, or we're already doing an illegal optimization: define <4 x i32> @load_bonus_bytes(i32* %addr1, <4 x i32> %v) { %ld1 = load i32, i32* %addr1 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32* %addr1, i64 3 %ld2 = load i32, i32* %addr2 %vec1 = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %ld1, i32 0 %vec2 = insertelement <4 x i32> %vec1, i32 %ld2, i32 3 ret <4 x i32> %vec2 } $ ./llc...

...> Do you want to replace > > lui $2, %hi(g1) > addiu $2, $2, %lo(g1) > > with this? > la $2, g1 > > If that is the case, you can add this pattern. > > def op_la : Operand<i32>; > > def LA : > FI<0x09, (outs CPURegs:$dst), (ins op_la:$addr0, op_la:$addr1), > "la $dst, $addr0", [(set CPURegs:$dst, > (add (MipsHi tglobaladdr:$addr0), (MipsLo > tglobaladdr:$addr1)))], IIAlu>; > > Note that you still need to find a way to print "g1" instead of "%hi(g1)". > > On Wed, Oct 5...

Hi, I have a question about redirecting message to a multiple addresses. I have an user script like following: require ["copy"]; redirect :copy "addr1 at dom.ain"; redirect :copy "addr2 at dom.ain"; All works fine, but if addr1 at ... has exceeded quota, this script seems stop working and addr2 at ... doesn't receive this message too. Is this correct behaviour? How to avoid this? Thanks, Kryol

Hello, am attempting again to resolve an issue with multi-tenancy and the forwarding to VMs between mailboxes. If in a multi-tenancy environment one uses custom contexts ie. [a1-ext1](a1) mailbox=101 at a1 and the associated voicemail.conf entry: [a1] 101 => 1234,My User 1,addr1 at email.com,,tz=eastern|imapuser=addr1 at email.com|imapfolder=Inbox 102 => 1234,My User 2,addr2 at email.com,,tz=eastern|imapuser=addr2 at email.com|imapfolder=Inbox now if a message is left in mailbox 101 and the user attempts to forward the message to mailbox 102 Asterisk responds that mail...

...* - * Side effect: On return pagefaults and preemption are disabled. - * * Can be invoked from any context. * * Requires careful handling when nesting multiple mappings because the map * management is stack based. The unmap has to be in the reverse order of * the map operation: * - * addr1 = kmap_atomic(page1); - * addr2 = kmap_atomic(page2); + * addr1 = kmap_local_page(page1); + * addr2 = kmap_local_page(page2); * ... - * kunmap_atomic(addr2); - * kunmap_atomic(addr1); + * kunmap_local(addr2); + * kunmap_local(addr1); * * Unmapping addr1 before addr2 is invalid and causes malf...

Do you want to replace lui $2, %hi(g1) addiu $2, $2, %lo(g1) with this? la $2, g1 If that is the case, you can add this pattern. def op_la : Operand<i32>; def LA : FI<0x09, (outs CPURegs:$dst), (ins op_la:$addr0, op_la:$addr1), "la $dst, $addr0", [(set CPURegs:$dst, (add (MipsHi tglobaladdr:$addr0), (MipsLo tglobaladdr:$addr1)))], IIAlu>; Note that you still need to find a way to print "g1" instead of "%hi(g1)". On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Gang-Ryung U...

...Do you want to replace > > lui $2, %hi(g1) > addiu $2, $2, %lo(g1) > > with this? > la $2, g1 > > If that is the case, you can add this pattern. > > def op_la : Operand<i32>; > > def LA : > FI<0x09, (outs CPURegs:$dst), (ins op_la:$addr0, op_la:$addr1), > "la $dst, $addr0", [(set CPURegs:$dst, > (add (MipsHi tglobaladdr:$addr0), (MipsLo > tglobaladdr:$addr1)))], IIAlu>; > > Note that you still need to find a way to print "g1" instead of "%hi(g1)". > > On Wed, Oct...

Hi, In order to emit "la $4,ADDR" instead of lui followed by addiu to load the data address, could you advise what is proper way to revise td files in the MIPS target? Thanks, -- Gang-Ryung Uh, Associate Professor Department of Computer Science College of Engineering, Boise State Univerisity tel: 1 208 426-5691 e-mail:guh at boisestate.edu http://cs.boisestate.edu/~uh

...gt; > addiu $2, $2, %lo(g1) > > > > with this? > > la $2, g1 > > > > If that is the case, you can add this pattern. > > > > def op_la : Operand<i32>; > > > > def LA : > > FI<0x09, (outs CPURegs:$dst), (ins op_la:$addr0, op_la:$addr1), > > "la $dst, $addr0", [(set CPURegs:$dst, > > (add (MipsHi tglobaladdr:$addr0), (MipsLo > > tglobaladdr:$addr1)))], IIAlu>; > > > > Note that you still need to find a way to print "g1" instead of > "%hi(g1)&...

Removing silly virtio-dev@ list because it's bouncing mail... On 12/07/2016 08:21 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Li's current patches do that. Well, maybe not pfn/length, but they do >> take a pfn and page-order, which fits perfectly with the kernel's >> concept of high-order pages. > > So we can send length in powers of two. Still, I don't see any

Removing silly virtio-dev@ list because it's bouncing mail... On 12/07/2016 08:21 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Li's current patches do that. Well, maybe not pfn/length, but they do >> take a pfn and page-order, which fits perfectly with the kernel's >> concept of high-order pages. > > So we can send length in powers of two. Still, I don't see any

...ad the extra memory, > regardless of whether this is a masked load or something else. > > Note that the x86 backend already does this, so either my proposal is ok > for x86, or we're already doing an illegal optimization: > > > define <4 x i32> @load_bonus_bytes(i32* %addr1, <4 x i32> %v) { > %ld1 = load i32, i32* %addr1 > %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32* %addr1, i64 3 > %ld2 = load i32, i32* %addr2 > %vec1 = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %ld1, i32 0 > %vec2 = insertelement <4 x i32> %vec1, i32 %ld2, i32 3 > ret &lt...