search for: addom

Louis, Please find the o/p below. Have a question, I read somewhere that using hostname lookups = yes in smb.conf helps with this. Is that correct? We followed the samba wiki to setup the DNS. Hostname: winad01 DNS Domain: addom.com FQDN: winad01.addom.com ipaddress: 10.10.10.10 ----------- Samba is running as an AD DC ----------- Checking file: /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="18.04.1 LTS (Bionic Beaver)" This computer is running Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS x86_64 ----------- running command...

...------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- netlogon 439 10.10.10..187 Wed Jun 19 04:15:07 2019 UTC - HMAC-SHA256 Administrator 440 10.10.10..25 Wed Jun 19 04:15:07 2019 UTC - HMAC-SHA256 smb.conf [global] workgroup = ADDOM realm = ADDOM.COM netbios name = WINAD01 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes server services = -dns Issue2 The net groupmap list doesn't show any AD groups? Is that to be expected? Thank you RT

Hi, Not sure if this has been asked before. When we create new users in our AD box, they get the UIDs in high 30000 range. Is this normal? If yes, can we change the starting range? We migrated using ClassicUpgrade, now running Ubuntu 18.04 VM The smb.conf looks like workgroup = ADDOM realm = ADDOM.COM netbios name = WNAD01 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 1 winbind nss info = rfc2307 server services = -dns The samba wiki page...

...disable spoolss = Yes kerberos method = secrets and keytab load printers = No local master = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%I max log size = 0 netbios name = SERVER-DEV nt pipe support = No printcap name = /dev/null realm = ADDOM.DOMAIN.TLD security = ADS server min protocol = SMB2 server string = Fileserver %m template homedir = /home/%U@%D template shell = /bin/bash unix extensions = No winbind offline logon = Yes winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind...

He MJ, Ah, my user does have an UID/GID assigned. Did you "copy" the administrator user or did you create a new user and gave him administrator rights. On my DC's. id username uid=10002(ADDOM\usernam) gid=10000(ADDOM\domain users) groups=10000(ADDOM\domain users),3000275(ADDOM\internet-proxy-manual).. And more. Where my Administratos reflex to: id administrator uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) Note the 10000 and 3000275 100xx are assigned GID's with RSAT while 3000275 (RID...

...it but the networks isnt ready yet. > > > And which group is set on sysvol in general on the share tab. > This is the current info (I did run sysvolreset to get the GPO's > working again, so this is not with your settings, I can look into this > again later) > Owner is ADDOM\Administrator > Allow Everyone Full Control > That should be sufficient. And.. its not "my" settings.. ;-) al can be found in : https://docs.microsoft.com/ I also recommend you to read, since you also having remote location: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/sto...

What for me looks a bit off. This is my output ( part of ) smbstatus -a on the AD-DC. PID Username Group Machine IP Protocol Version Encryption Signing 25843 ADDOM\member-vpn1$ ADDOM\domain computers 192.168.0.2 (ipv4:192.168.0.2:36860) SMB3_11 - AES-128-CMAC 34317 root ADDOM\domain users 192.168.0.5 (ipv4:192.168.0.5:55934) SMB2_10 - HMAC-SHA256 Service pid Machine Connected at Encryption Signing IPC$...

...solute path names # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/my.domain.tld/Policies/ # owner: root # group: BUILTIN\\administrators user::rwx user:root:rwx user:BUILTIN\\administrators:rwx user:BUILTIN\\server\040operators:r-x user:NT\040AUTHORITY\\system:rwx user:NT\040AUTHORITY\\authenticated\040users:r-x user:ADDOM\\group\040policy\040creator\040owners:rwx group::rwx group:BUILTIN\\administrators:rwx group:BUILTIN\\server\040operators:r-x group:NT\040AUTHORITY\\system:rwx group:NT\040AUTHORITY\\authenticated\040users:r-x group:ADDOM\\group\040policy\040creator\040owners:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::...

...root > > # group: BUILTIN\\administrators > > user::rwx > > user:root:rwx > > user:BUILTIN\\administrators:rwx > > user:BUILTIN\\server\040operators:r-x > > user:NT\040AUTHORITY\\system:rwx > > user:NT\040AUTHORITY\\authenticated\040users:r-x > > user:ADDOM\\group\040policy\040creator\040owners:rwx > > group::rwx > > group:BUILTIN\\administrators:rwx > > group:BUILTIN\\server\040operators:r-x > > group:NT\040AUTHORITY\\system:rwx > > group:NT\040AUTHORITY\\authenticated\040users:r-x > > group:ADDOM\\group\040policy\...

Hello，I'm using samba ad dc about a year. I have 2 DCs, One is DC1 with FSMO role. And another is DC2. there's a error in DC1 when i use dbcheck tool. And samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs--fix can't fix that. And I made a big mistake ! In DC2 I use "tdbbackup -s .bak /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb" create a bak file. and using that bak file replace the sam.ldb

UNOFFICIAL Thanks Tim, I was just wondering if my mistake was raising the functional-level. This confirms it. This apparently also broke backup. I cannot create the container, because the current schema (2003) doesn't support msDS-PasswordSettingsContainer. It seems impossible (and dangerous) to update the schema. I was given a reference to a thread about updating the schema but - the

...hank you. Is there any reason you can't just rejoin DC1 from DC2? You may wish to steal the FSMO roles across first. The background is that along with metadata that is generally consistent, the sam.ldb file contains this record: dn: @ROOTDSE configurationNamingContext: CN=Configuration,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=c  om defaultNamingContext: DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com rootDomainNamingContext: DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com schemaNamingContext: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,D  C=com subschemaSubentry: CN=Aggregate,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=add...

...MJ On 18-6-2019 14:35, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > He MJ, > > Ah, my user does have an UID/GID assigned. > Did you "copy" the administrator user or did you create a new user and gave him administrator rights. > > On my DC's. > id username > uid=10002(ADDOM\usernam) gid=10000(ADDOM\domain users) groups=10000(ADDOM\domain users),3000275(ADDOM\internet-proxy-manual).. And more. > > Where my Administratos reflex to: > id administrator > uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) > > Note the 10000 and 3000275 > 100xx are assigned GID...

...t the Password Settings Container is as long as it exists. So the simplest short-term kludge to get back to a working AD would be to create the PSO container as an object that does exist in your schema, e.g. ldbadd -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb dn: CN=Password Settings Container,CN=System,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com objectClass: container This is a major kludge to the DB and so please delete this object as soon as you can, otherwise it will cause major support problems going forward. The better short/medium-term solution would be to roll your functional level back. Unfortunately th...

Hi, On 18-6-2019 12:57, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I have just tried this as root and it worked for me: > > samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc4 --targetdir=/backup > -Urowland at samdom.example.com > > When I tried to run it as normal user, it threw an error because the > user wasn't allowed access to the backup dir, allowing the user access > cured

...you. Is there any reason you can't just rejoin DC1 from DC2? You may wish to steal the FSMO roles across first. The background is that along with metadata that is generally consistent, the sam.ldb file contains this record: dn: @ROOTDSE configurationNamingContext: CN=Configuration,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=c om defaultNamingContext: DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com rootDomainNamingContext: DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com schemaNamingContext: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,D C=com subschemaSubentry: CN=Aggregate,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=add...

...er is as long as it exists. So the simplest short-term > kludge to get back to a working AD would be to create the PSO > container as an object that does exist in your schema, e.g. > > ldbadd -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb > dn: CN=Password Settings > Container,CN=System,DC=addom,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com > objectClass: container > > This is a major kludge to the DB and so please delete this object as > soon as you can, otherwise it will cause major support problems going > forward. > > The better short/medium-term solution would be to roll your func...

On 25/10/2020 20:37, Sonic wrote: > The reset allowed the current GPO to take effect, but right after > adding a new GPO (just named it, no editing, or linking) the > sysvolcheck fails: > # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception > - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory >

Hi Rowland, Just as a test, I installed the dhcp server in the DC ( in the lab). Then configured the dhcp as per the wiki This is what I see. And again the forward zone update despite the errors but the reverse doesn't When releasing the lease Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: Release: IP: 192.168.14.198 Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: execute_statement argv[0] =

...has no access. The thing to note is here is if I add an A record using the DNS manager and select the option to create the associated pointer record, it only creates the forward one. I am logged into the machine with RSAT using the domain administrator account Back to the reverse one. I setup the ADDOM\WIN7VM01$ with full permission in the rev record I just created. After the reboot the forward DNS record now shows permissions for ADDOM\WIN7VM01$ instead of just WIN7VM01$ Is "Register this connection's address in DNS " checked? It is ticked In ipconfig /all , the details looks cor...