search for: addintervalstospill

So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with infinite weights, right? And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return true on its register then? On 8/21/06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira <fernando at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > > Well, someone correct me if am w...

> So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with > infinite weights, right? > And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return true > on its register then? > I am not very sure about addIntervalsToSpill, but, for all the registers created to replace a spilled register...

...er you replace the spilled one with. And then you need to allocate physical registers to them. Is it possible to assign physical register to the virtual one which has a stack slot already? On 8/21/06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira <fernando at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > > > So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with > > infinite weights, right? > > And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return > true > > on its register then? > > > > I am not very sure about addIntervalsToSpill, but, for all the registers &gt...

Well, someone correct me if am wrong, but, you still have to allocate physical registers to them, because their values must be reloaded before been used. But after you spill a register, you break its live ranges, so, each use of that register can be loaded into a different physical. In my register allocator, after I spill reg_v: For each use of reg_v: create a new reg_v' replace reg_v

On 8/7/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Anton Vayvod wrote: > > I'm developing a register allocator that works iteratively. It spills > some > > virtual registers on each iteration until all the rest have physical > ones > > assigned. > > Take a look at the linear scan allocator. It is also iterative: it uses >