search for: addfalse

...well. In the Hexagon backend, a predicated instruction can translate into another form called 'predicate new'. So, in our example of 'ADD', we can have another transformation like this - ADD--- ---> ADDtrue -----> ADDtru_new (predicate new form of true) \-----> ADDfalse -----> ADDfalse_new (predicate new form of false) // Define Predicate New relation def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of the instructions. let ColFields = [...

...kend, a predicated instruction can translate into another > form called 'predicate new'. So, in our example of 'ADD', we can have > another transformation like this - > > ADD--- ---> ADDtrue -----> ADDtru_new (predicate new form of true) > \-----> ADDfalse -----> ADDfalse_new (predicate new form of false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attributes of...

...unpredicated instructions. let KeyCol = ["nopred"]; // Value columns are predicate=true and predicate=false let ValueCols = [["true"], ["false"]]; }; That should be enough to generate a table: // key , PredSense=true, PredSense=false { ADD , ADDtrue, ADDfalse, // BaseOpcode="ADD" { SUB , SUBtrue, SUBfalse, // BaseOpcode="SUB" … > 5) We need some changes in the TGParser.cpp so that it can use the > information specified > through the RelationMap and populate relevant fields in the RelHexagon > class....

...end, a predicated instruction can translate into > another form called 'predicate new'. So, in our example of 'ADD', we > can have another transformation like this - > > ADD--- ---> ADDtrue -----> ADDtru_new (predicate new form of true) > \-----> ADDfalse -----> ADDfalse_new (predicate new form of > false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attribut...

...derstand it completely. Also, how do I get the table from the definition above? For the table, I need to know the name of the predicated-true and false instructions. > That should be enough to generate a table: > > // key , PredSense=true, PredSense=false > { ADD , ADDtrue, ADDfalse, // BaseOpcode="ADD" > { SUB , SUBtrue, SUBfalse, // BaseOpcode="SUB" > > > 5) We need some changes in the TGParser.cpp so that it can use the > > information specified through the RelationMap and populate relevant > > fields in th...

Hi Everyone, After some more thoughts to the Jacob's suggestion of using multiclasses for Opcode mapping, this is what I have come up with. Please take a look at the design below and let me know if you have any suggestions/questions. I have tried to keep the design target independent so that other targets could benefit from it. 1) The idea is to add 3 new classes into

...end, a predicated instruction can translate into > another form called 'predicate new'. So, in our example of 'ADD', we > can have another transformation like this - > > ADD--- ---> ADDtrue -----> ADDtru_new (predicate new form of true) > \-----> ADDfalse -----> ADDfalse_new (predicate new form of > false) > > // Define Predicate New relation > def getPredNewOpcode : InstrMapping { > let FilterClass = "PredNewRel"; > > let RowFields = ["BaseOpcode"]; > > // ColFields is a list of flags/attribut...

On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:02 AM, "Jyotsna Verma" <jverma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Hi Jacob, > > Thanks for the suggestions. I have a few questions here. > >> You are on to something here, but you don't need to define a 'Relations' > class >> on top of the tablegen records. They are already relations, you just need > the >>