search for: addentri

Folks, I'd like propose a new error message format for LLD so that error message for undefined or duplicated symbols are more informative and easy to read. Below are examples of the current error messages (note that characters in red are actually red on terminal): *Undefined symbols* /ssd/clang/bin/ld.lld: error: /ssd/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Writer.cpp:207: undefined symbol

On Mar 24, 2017 5:22 PM, "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com> wrote: I figured you might consider moving the basenames of the filename earlier in the diagnostic, something like: bin/ld.lld: *error:* duplicate symbol: lld::elf::MipsGotSection::addEntry(lld::elf::SymbolBody&, long, lld::elf::RelExpr) *>>> defined at* Writer.cpp:38 in

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 03/24/2017 11:42 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > On Mar 24, 2017 5:22 PM, "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > I figured you might consider moving the basenames of the filename earlier > in the diagnostic, something like: >

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > I lile the idea of having it more structured and I think your suggested > format is the right direction. > > I think one principle should be that we assume that file names and symbol > names are "really long" (possibly wrapped by the terminal etc.). > Right. That's what we should

On 3/29/17 12:53 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev wrote: > Put it all together, the following error messages should work for > everybody. I'll create a patch to make this change and send it for > review. Thank you guys for the inputs! > > > Undefined symbol error: > > bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: >

I am late on the thread, but I just want to say that the new format looks awesome! Thanks, Rafael On 29 March 2017 at 15:18, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > My bad. I intended this. > > Undefined symbol error: > > bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: > lld::elf::EhFrameSection<llvm::object::ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0, >

Hi, I'm going to add MIPS target linking support to LLD. One of the things I bumped into is the dynamic table. MIPS ABI declares many additional mandatory dynamic table entries like DT_MIPS_LOCAL_GOTNO, DT_MIPS_SYMTABNO etc. Some of these entries can be allocated and initialized at once, other entries should be allocated in the beginning and initialized at the end. For example we need to know

You can add a member function in the TargetHandler to override the dynamic table that the target wants to create. Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 10/8/2013 2:42 PM, Simon Atanasyan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to add MIPS target linking support to LLD. One of the things > I bumped into is the dynamic table. MIPS ABI declares many additional > mandatory dynamic table entries like

Hi, all! I have samba 4 AD (4.1.22) and try to create new domain in existing forest with controller on windows 2008 r2. It is possible? 1. At dcpromo, after all needed containers replications, I get error: Active Directory Domain Services could not create the object CN=CHDOM,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=... Log from samba: [...]

Is it me or does the MySQLdb module in Centos not support python's DBAPI 2.0?

Hello - make fails to build the latest git of samba4 - erroring on drsblobs.so. Below is a full log from autogen.sh to the make. Would you have any suggestions on proceeding? Thank you, Ryan ryan at test1:~/samba-master/source4$ sudo ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: running script/mkversion.sh ./script/mkversion.sh: 'version.h' created for Samba("4.0.0alpha12-GIT-d83850a")