search for: adddress

...tdown ??? and ??? sudo upsmon -D Network UPS Tools upsmon 2.7.4 kill: No such process 0.000000 UPS: ups@<ip address> (slave) (power value 1) 0.000718 Using power down flag file /etc/killpower 0.001192 debug level is '1' 0.008274 Trying to connect to UPS [ups@<ip adddress>] 0.009866 Logged into UPS ups@<ip adddress> 290.089253 Critical UPS: ups@<ip adddress> 290.089313 Shutting down any UPSes in MASTER mode... 290.089322 Executing automatic power-fail shutdown Broadc...

...n 2 distinct softphone clients (Bria and Groundwire), I am able to register successfully, and place a SIP call, with no certificate warnings. But shortly after I place that first call and hang up, I receive a certificate name mismatch error in the softphone, the error presenting me with the *IP adddress* of my Asterisk server, not the hostname, and of course the TLS certificates only have the hostname, not the IP, and I have configured the soft phone to use the hostname, not the IP, to connect. I?m guessing there is some currently unset hostname setting within asterisk/pjsip that is defaulting...

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > The "upsrw" command contacts upsd, so it sounds like you should be able to add a user to upsd.users on the NAS, and then run something like > this on the Mac: > > ??upsrw -s battery.charge.low=80 -u upsmaster -s sekret UPS at synology > > Per?http://networkupstools.org/docs/man/upsd.users.html?,

...gt; > Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: connect to > > <http://paalmettodomains.com> > paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: > > Connection timed out > > That looks totally broken: <http://paalmettodomains.com> > Where does that come from? An HTTP adddress has no valid function in > SMTP communication. > Even the domain seems to be a typo. It's a typo. > > > Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: C33128410546: to=< > > <mailto:tdukes at paalmettodomains.com> > tdukes at paalmettodomains.com>, > > r...

After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen. [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux

After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen. [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux

Hi there I have a form that saves a user and an address, which are seperate objects. A user has_many addresses. How to display error messages for the adddress object which gets saved via the same html form? I''m getting all my validation errors for the user object, but no detailed messages for the address object despite putting error_messages_for :address in my view.

...tc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth: Device eth[1,2,3] has different MAC address than expected, ignoring NOTE: this worked until yesterday, I could reboot, update whatever it always came up in the same way and I also did not need to swap the network cables EVERY time ... Even without HWADDR/MAX adddress I have to swap the cables every time (eth[1,2,3]). Did something change in the kernel/networking/udev I am not aware of? What am I doing wrong all over sudden? Jobst -- Jobst Schmalenbach Programmer - an organism that turns coffee into software !

...op" instead of "name" and the other is that the second argument should probably be NULL and instead it's a pointer to a string containing the digit zero. In the meantime, things will work but one extra check (doing a forward lookup on the name returned by a reverse lookup on the adddress of the client) will not be done. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

...the expeditor. We understand and appreciate your intimacy and we appologize if this message arrived to you from mistake. If in the future you don't want to receive our information please use the address http://www.romaniancancerleague.org/newsletter/un-sub-scribe.php or sent an e-mail to adddress office@romaniancancerleague.ro?subject=un-sub-scribe To avoid all troubles please mention all alternative e-mail addresses that you want to be deleted from our data base, other than e-mail address where you received this message.

...| | IP1_ISP2 - eth2 | |-----------------------| I have configured firewall as specified on http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html and all works ok, except for connections between my firewall and other hosts of "other" ISP. Example: I have two DNS with public ip adddresses, one for each ISP: |-DNS1------------| | IP2_ISP1 - eth0 | |-----------------| |-DNS2------------| | IP2_ISP2 - eth0 | |-----------------| Ping from DNS1 to IP1_ISP1 of FW is ok (response from eth1 of FW). Ping from DNS1 to IP1_ISP2 of FW fails (response from eth1 of FW). Ping from DNS2 to IP1...

...up failing. The behavior is very strange. Say that eth1 is one of the WANs which was tested as down and removed from the balancing rule. If I then try to ping an Internet host using eth1 like this "ping 128.101.101.101 -I eth1", the router sends ARP requests out eth1 asking for the MAC adddress which corresponds to 128.101.101.101! Has anyone experienced this problem before? What I''d really like is to be able to manually mark an interface as "dead" without actually taking it down or removing it from the load balancing route. When you run "ip route list table bal...

Hi all I have a problem to register a cisco 7960 to an asterisk 1.2.2 I defined in sip.conf the next : ["phonenumber"] type=friend username="username" secret="password" host=dynamic context=work I am trying to catch the register requests with sip debug with no success (empty screen). I can only catch the register messages with ngrep on host it's comming

Third time trying respond! -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working From: Gordon Messmer < <mailto:gordon.messmer at gmail.com> gordon.messmer at gmail.com> Date: Tue, July 24, 2018 10:31 am To: <mailto:centos at centos.org> centos at centos.org On 07/23/2018 03:39 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > Mail has come to an abrupt stop. Running C7,

...5]:25: > Connection timed out > Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: connect to > <http://paalmettodomains.com> paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: > Connection timed out That looks totally broken: <http://paalmettodomains.com> Where does that come from? An HTTP adddress has no valid function in SMTP communication. Even the domain seems to be a typo. > Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: C33128410546: to=< > <mailto:tdukes at paalmettodomains.com> tdukes at paalmettodomains.com>, > relay=none, delay=13075, delays=13015/0.02/60/0, dsn=...

Hello, Good question - I hoped to deal them out twice a year or so, but it (toxically, in hindsight) stumbled on trying to adddress a few bugs reported in 2.8.0 to deliver fixes as 2.8.1 :\ I've dealt with projects that port stuff to a release/stable branch, and at least for a small team like ours it is a much more difficult endeavour/overhead than trying to keep "master" clean enough that after almost any merg...

Hello, Good question - I hoped to deal them out twice a year or so, but it (toxically, in hindsight) stumbled on trying to adddress a few bugs reported in 2.8.0 to deliver fixes as 2.8.1 :\ I've dealt with projects that port stuff to a release/stable branch, and at least for a small team like ours it is a much more difficult endeavour/overhead than trying to keep "master" clean enough that after almost any merg...

...domains.com> > >>> > >> paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: > >> > >>> Connection timed out > >>> > >> > >> That looks totally broken: <http://paalmettodomains.com> > >> Where does that come from? An HTTP adddress has no valid function in > >> SMTP communication. > >> Even the domain seems to be a typo. > >> > > > > It's a typo. > > > > > >> > >>> Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: C33128410546: to=< > >>> <...

...cket at microsoft site but didnt get any reply upto now. Recent days i got an email from RAV antivirus domain name ends with "br" saying that one of their server caught the email has antivirus and my email id is in the list too as i know i donno any single member of bunch of email adddress, some are "online.microsoft.com" domain related might be spoofed . my hotmail account is daily filling up with exactly copies of 144KB or 156 KB or 157KB files. as a univ Tech consultant can you open a ticket for Microsoft/hotmail and catch up the culprit? thanx in advance. >From...

...ect to >>> <http://paalmettodomains.com> >>> >> paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: >> >>> Connection timed out >>> >> >> That looks totally broken: <http://paalmettodomains.com> >> Where does that come from? An HTTP adddress has no valid function in >> SMTP communication. >> Even the domain seems to be a typo. >> > > It's a typo. > > >> >>> Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: C33128410546: to=< >>> <mailto:tdukes at paalmettodomains.com> >>...