Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "addabstracttypeus".
Did you mean:
addabstracttypeuser
2004 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254):
((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST);
Type is not Value now and for me this code call
llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type
VMT in as setName in Value VMT)
with random argument values and terminated with assert fail:
Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not
abstract!"), function addAbstractTypeUser, file
/home/wanderer/pkg/build/ll...
2004 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
...&ST)
to:
ST.insert(Name, Ty)
Hope that helps.
Reid.
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 07:01, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254):
>
> ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST);
>
> Type is not Value now and for me this code call
> llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type
> VMT in as setName in Value VMT)
> with random argument values and terminated with assert fail:
>
> Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not
> abstract!"), function addAbstractTypeUser, file
&g...
2005 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] Recursive Types using the llvm support library
...> that you have a hope to understand them and so they are more compact :)
I took your advide and used Module::addTypeName which is a great idea
that I didn't know about.
Now I am getting a seg fault, here
SymbolTable.cpp:251
if (T->isAbstract()) {
cast<DerivedType>(T)->addAbstractTypeUser(this);
I am assuming the patch mentioned earlier on the thread will fix this.
I just wanted to ask to make sure before i went ahead and recompiled.
-John
2005 Mar 21
1
[LLVMdev] Recursive Types using the llvm support library
...d them and so they are more compact :)
>
> I took your advide and used Module::addTypeName which is a great idea
> that I didn't know about.
>
> Now I am getting a seg fault, here
>
> SymbolTable.cpp:251
> if (T->isAbstract()) {
> cast<DerivedType>(T)->addAbstractTypeUser(this);
>
> I am assuming the patch mentioned earlier on the thread will fix this.
> I just wanted to ask to make sure before i went ahead and recompiled.
You would have to give me more context to say for sure, but updating to
current CVS can't hurt.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/s...
2005 Mar 21
2
[LLVMdev] Recursive Types using the llvm support library
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, John Carrino wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
>>>> Is assert(!NewSTy->isAbstract()) must pass after this line?
>>>
>>> In this case, yup.
>>>
>> I create test program and assert failed in it:
>>
>> { \2 *, sbyte * }
>
> How do I decode the \2 in this? I am