Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "add_with_cari".
Did you mean:
add_with_cary
2008 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] Checked arithmetic
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>> Why not define an "add with overflow" intrinsic that returns its value and
>> overflow bit as an i1?
>
> Chris:
>
> I understand several simple ways to implement add with carry. Your
> suggestion is one of them. What I'm trying to understand is how to
> handle the conditional code issue generally.
2008 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Checked arithmetic
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:02 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > I want to background process this for a bit, but it would be helpful to
> > discuss some approaches first.
> >
> > There would appear to be three approaches:
> >
> > 1. Introduce a CC register class into the IR. This seems to be a
> >
2008 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Checked arithmetic
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:11 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> >> Why not define an "add with overflow" intrinsic that returns its value and
> >> overflow bit as an i1?
> >
> > Chris:
> >
> > I understand several simple ways to implement add with carry. Your
> > suggestion is one of them. What