Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "add_r".
Did you mean:
add_ri
2009 Nov 02
1
[PATCHv4 0/6] qemu-kvm: vhost net support
This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend.
This is not intented for merge. See vhost net patch description for
details. This applies on top of commit
47e465f031fc43c53ea8f08fa55cc3482c6435c8 in Avi's tree. It won't apply
to tree tip. TODO: rebase.
The patchset also includes raw socket backend since I find it useful for
testing vhost. When we get to merging, there's no
2009 Nov 02
1
[PATCHv4 0/6] qemu-kvm: vhost net support
This adds support for vhost-net virtio kernel backend.
This is not intented for merge. See vhost net patch description for
details. This applies on top of commit
47e465f031fc43c53ea8f08fa55cc3482c6435c8 in Avi's tree. It won't apply
to tree tip. TODO: rebase.
The patchset also includes raw socket backend since I find it useful for
testing vhost. When we get to merging, there's no
2016 Jun 02
2
BPF backend with vector operations - error "Could not infer all types in, pattern!"
Hello.
I come back to this older thread.
Again, because of i64immSExt32 I receive TableGen error "Could not infer all types
in, pattern!" (exact details written below). So far I'm not able to generate selection
code with TableGen for the ADD_r* instructions, etc:
def i64immSExt32 : PatLeaf<(imm),
[{return isInt<32>(N->getSExtValue()); }]>;
As in the case of https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/LfltBGG9ru0 : "It
seems that defining a new register class changes how the tbl...
2016 Jan 07
3
BPF backend with vector operations - some strange error
Hello.
I've tried to add some simple arithmetic vector operations to the BPF backend
available in the LLVM repo. Because I added in BPFRegisterInfo.td another RegisterClass
(taken from the Mips backend):
def MSA128W: RegisterClass<"BPF", [v2i64, v2f64], 128,
(sequence "W%u", 0, 31)>;
in order to support vector for example, ADD