Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "add_f64".
Did you mean:
add64
2009 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] LegalizeFloatType:ExpandFloatRes_FADD
...and in 2.5 the above function is:
void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandFloatRes_FADD(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
SDValue &Hi) {
SDValue Call = LibCallify(GetFPLibCall(N->getValueType(0),
RTLIB::ADD_F32, RTLIB::ADD_F64,
RTLIB::ADD_F80,
RTLIB::ADD_PPCF128),
N, false);
assert(Call.getNode()->getOpcode() == ISD::BUILD_PAIR &&
"Call lowered wrongly!");
Lo = Call.getOperand(0); Hi = Call.getOperand(1);
}
Bu...
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...ase ISD::SREM:
- Lo = ExpandLibCall(RTLIB::SREM_I64, Node, true, Hi);
- break;
- case ISD::UREM:
- Lo = ExpandLibCall(RTLIB::UREM_I64, Node, true, Hi);
- break;
-
- case ISD::FADD:
- Lo = ExpandLibCall(GetFPLibCall(VT, RTLIB::ADD_F32,
- RTLIB::ADD_F64,
- RTLIB::ADD_F80,
- RTLIB::ADD_PPCF128),
- Node, false, Hi);
- break;
- case ISD::FSUB:
- Lo = ExpandLibCall(GetFPLibCall(VT, RTLIB::SUB_F32,
- RTLIB::S...