search for: add_extent_rec

...btrfs_level_size(root, *level - 1); - ret = btrfs_lookup_extent_info(NULL, root, bytenr, blocksize, - &refs, NULL); + ret = btrfs_lookup_extent_info(NULL, root, bytenr, *level - 1, + 1, &refs, NULL); if (ret < 0) refs = 0; @@ -2224,7 +2226,7 @@ static int add_extent_rec(struct cache_tree *extent_cache, struct btrfs_key *parent_key, u64 start, u64 nr, u64 extent_item_refs, int is_root, int inc_ref, int set_checked, - u64 max_size) + int metadata, u64 max_size) { struct extent_record *rec; struct cache_extent *cache; @@ -2277,6 +2279,7...

...cpu(buf, &key, i); + if (ri != NULL) { + struct btrfs_key drop_key; + btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(&drop_key, + &ri->drop_progress); + if ((level == ri->drop_level) + && is_dropped_key(&key, &drop_key)) { + continue; + } + } ret = add_extent_rec(extent_cache, &key, ptr, size, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, size); @@ -5449,6 +5480,7 @@ static int check_chunks_and_extents(struct btrfs_root *root) struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans = NULL; int slot; struct btrfs_root_item ri; + struct list_head dropping_trees; dev_cache =...

Hi gang, I was a little surprised to see that patch go by recently which fixed an endian bug. I went to see how sparse checking looked and it was.. broken. I got it going again in my Fedora environment. Most of the patches are just cleanups, but there *were* three real bugs lurking in all that sparse warning spam. So I maintain that it''s worth our time to keep it going and fix