Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "add9".
Did you mean:
add
2014 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Vectorization] Mis match in code generated
...4, align 4,
> !tbaa !1 %add5 = add nsw i32 %add3, %3 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr
> inbounds i32* %a, i32 4 %4 = load i32* %arrayidx6, align 4, !tbaa !1
> %add7 = add nsw i32 %add5, %4 %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a,
> i32 5 %5 = load i32* %arrayidx8, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add9 = add nsw i32
> %add7, %5 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 6 %6 = load
> i32* %arrayidx10, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add11 = add nsw i32 %add9, %6
> %arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 7 %7 = load i32*
> %arrayidx12, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add13 = add nsw i32 %a...
2014 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Vectorization] Mis match in code generated
...2* %arrayidx4, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add5 = add nsw i32 %add3, %3
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 4
%4 = load i32* %arrayidx6, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add7 = add nsw i32 %add5, %4
%arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 5
%5 = load i32* %arrayidx8, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add9 = add nsw i32 %add7, %5
%arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 6
%6 = load i32* %arrayidx10, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add11 = add nsw i32 %add9, %6
%arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 7
%7 = load i32* %arrayidx12, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add13 = add nsw i32 %add11, %7
%a...
2014 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Vectorization] Mis match in code generated
...load i32* %arrayidx4, align 4,
!tbaa !1 %add5 = add nsw i32 %add3, %3 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr
inbounds i32* %a, i32 4 %4 = load i32* %arrayidx6, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add7 = add nsw i32 %add5, %4 %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a,
i32 5 %5 = load i32* %arrayidx8, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add9 = add nsw i32
%add7, %5 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 6 %6 = load
i32* %arrayidx10, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add11 = add nsw i32 %add9, %6
%arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 7 %7 = load i32*
%arrayidx12, align 4, !tbaa !1 %add13 = add nsw i32 %add11, %7
%arrayidx14...
2014 Nov 10
2
[LLVMdev] [Vectorization] Mis match in code generated
...x6 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 4
> > > %4 = load i32* %arrayidx6, align 4, !tbaa !1
> > > %add7 = add nsw i32 %add5, %4
> > > %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 5
> > > %5 = load i32* %arrayidx8, align 4, !tbaa !1
> > > %add9 = add nsw i32 %add7, %5
> > > %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 6
> > > %6 = load i32* %arrayidx10, align 4, !tbaa !1
> > > %add11 = add nsw i32 %add9, %6
> > > %arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %a, i32 7
> > > %7 = load...
2009 Dec 10
3
vector help
I have tow vectors one is the subset of another
x is a subset of X Both are vectors with n elements
X[X %in% x] would give me x again rite because it is a subset but i want all
those are not in x from X.
X[which(X != x)] should this do that
Thanks
Ramya
--
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/vector-help-tp960277p960277.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at
2013 Dec 19
0
Package management
...ause you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/108cb765-add9-4f0b-ad2e-fa521836ec8b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
2013 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer
...ntptr
inbounds float* %c, i64 %add312 SCEV: ((4 * %add312)<nsw> + %c)<nsw>
LV: Src Scev: ((4 * %add2)<nsw> + %c)<nsw>Sink Scev: ((4 * %add312)<nsw>
+ %c)<nsw>(Induction step: 0)
LV: Distance for store float %add5, float* %arrayidx6, align 4 to
store float %add9, float* %arrayidx10, align 4: ((4 * %add312)<nsw> +
(-4 * %add2))
Non-consecutive pointer access
LV: We don't need a runtime memory check.
LV: Can't vectorize due to memory conflicts
LV: Not vectorizing.
To answer Nadav's question. This kind of loop is generated by a
scientific...
2013 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer
The debug messages are misleading. They should read “trying to vectorize a list of …”; The problem is that the SCEV analysis is unable to detect that C[ir0] and C[ir1] are consecutive. Is this loop from an important benchmark ?
Thanks,
Nadav
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Frank Winter <fwinter at jlab.org> wrote:
> The SLP vectorizer apparently did something in the prologue of the
2012 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] problem trying to write an LLVM register-allocation pass
Hi Susan,
It looks like the bitcode you have attached is corrupted. You should make
sure to attach it as a binary file. Alternatively you can attach the LLVM
assembly as text. You can generate an assembly file from bitcode with:
llvm-dis -o <asm file> <bitcode>
Regards,
Lang.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Susan Horwitz <horwitz at cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Thanks Lang,
2012 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] problem trying to write an LLVM register-allocation pass
..., i32 %x.0)
%add = add nsw i32 %x.0, 5
%mul = mul nsw i32 %x.0, 2
%sub = sub nsw i32 %mul, 1
%mul3 = mul nsw i32 %add, %sub
%add4 = add nsw i32 %x.0, %mul3
%div5 = sdiv i32 %add4, %x.0
%add6 = add nsw i32 5, %add
%sub7 = sub nsw i32 %div5, %add6
%add8 = add nsw i32 %add4, %sub7
%add9 = add nsw i32 %add8, %x.0
%add10 = add nsw i32 %add9, %add
%add11 = add nsw i32 %add10, %sub
%call12 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([37 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %add4, i32 %sub7, i32 %add11, i32 %x.0, i32 %add, i32 %sub)
ret i32 0
}
declare i32 @rand()...
2017 Oct 26
0
not healing one file
Hey Richard,
Could you share the following informations please?
1. gluster volume info <volname>
2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks
getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath>
3. glustershd & glfsheal logs
Regards,
Karthik
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
> On a side note, try recently released health
2017 Oct 26
3
not healing one file
On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it
does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all
the three machines.
On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster
> Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next
2017 Oct 26
2
not healing one file
...53A100A8DC (0388a361-592d-43c0-93f1-a1660da1bc11) on home-client-2
[2017-10-25 10:13:38.245857] W [MSGID: 108015] [afr-self-heal-entry.c:56:afr_selfheal_entry_delete] 0-home-replicate-0: expunging file a3f5a769-8859-48e3-96ca-60a988eb9358/22D343CF855E8C5DADF8F8916A1DC6EB00DB1127 (c9644d17-1bd8-41bc-add9-4205c5b01b23) on home-client-2
[2017-10-25 10:13:38.294372] W [MSGID: 108015] [afr-self-heal-entry.c:56:afr_selfheal_entry_delete] 0-home-replicate-0: expunging file a3f5a769-8859-48e3-96ca-60a988eb9358/059B8FB7C9A2BC53F1B8B05EADC00E8DB95EFBF0 (f77d7dc1-556a-4c10-a4f7-468afeb6cec9) on home-client-2...