search for: adcli

Greetings, I have an advanced config question that I'm hoping the Samba Gods can help me with in regards to feasibility and execution. I'll give the concept of what I want to do, followed by the details of my present config. I have a functioning samba 3.0.8pre2 server that is multihomed. The 100Mb line is attached to our main network. the 1Gb line is attached to a private 1Gb lan

Thanks alot Chad for quick response. Does this means that, we can not use LLVM optimizations except O1, O2, O3, O4 and unroll-loops with clang? One more thing I would like to know that If I want to process multiple modules with opt at the same time like opt -adce *.bc then how is it possible with opt in one go, if I process all the bytecode files within Makefile. Thanks. Shahzad On Thu, Jun

Dear List, I'm planning to migrate an existing Samba 3.4.7 NT4-domain (our.site.com) to a Samba 4.1.6 AD-domain (ad.our.site.com) on another machine. Our site currently has about 30 clients and 50 user accounts. My plan is to setup the ADC on the other machine and to migrate the user accounts using the Samba4 classicupgrade tool. I would then newly setup groups, permissions, etc. on the new

Hello everyone I am trying to use some LLVM optimizations like -die or -adce. Is it possible to use them along clang? Or is there a way where these optimization can be passed on to "opt" tool through clang, if opt is being used by clang behind the scenes? Thanks alot Regards Shahzad

Hai, ? Im bit lost. ? I've installed a member server with winbind.? ( samba 4.1.2 (sernet) ) the server joined the domain without any problems. ? when i type getent passwd on the ADC server, im getting:? ( and is ok ) ? ROTTERDAM\Administrator:*:0:100::/home/users/%U:/bin/bash ROTTERDAM\Guest:*:3000002:3000003::/home/users/%U:/bin/bash

On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Abdul Wahid Memon wrote: > Hello everyone > > I am trying to use some LLVM optimizations like -die or -adce. Is it > possible to use them along clang? > > Or is there a way where these optimization can be passed on to "opt" > tool through clang, if opt is being used by clang behind the scenes? > No, opt only works on llvm

I'm trying to work out LLVM code which generates something similar to the following when adding large multiword numbers stored as separate words: ADD x1 x1 ADC x2 y2 ADC x3 y3 etc, where such a three argument add like ADC on x86 (which includes a carry in the addition) is available as a machine op. The background to this is that I'm trying to implement fast multiword addition in

From: Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> > It seems some cards use a PLL for their ADC, so they can lock to an > incoming SPDIF signal, but always use a local crystal clock source for > their DAC. These cards do not have their ADC and DAC synchronised. Do common on-board or PCI sound card lock to some incoming signal? Yes, there is a crystal oscillator and a PLL or divider to

Hello. I'm trying to install Exchange 2013 (SP1 CU5) on a domain with only a Samba ADC (because I've had many problems trying to get OpenChange to work with Outlook 2013.) I've already hacked the attributes of the ADC's LDAP entry so Exchange is happy with the OS version (see my previous post,) but I want to find out if there are any known problems with letting Exchange make

Hi, all, I am porting speex on ARM7TDMI, I have done some optimization, the result is that the encoder and decoder need about 60 MCPS for 5.96kbps bitrate and complexity 0. Can someone give me informtion about Speex optimization on ARM7? Another question, my ADC and DAC are 12 bits, but Speex codec is 16bits, Did someone try to modify speex to 12 bits? I think if I modify speex to 12 bits, the

Hi Shahzad, > I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to > produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is > producing an error > > $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c > -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce this won't work because you aren't passing the IR to opt (you need -o - for that if using a pipe) and you

Hi all, The conclusion of the discussion is that most sound cards indeed have different capture and playing frequencies for the unknown reasons. But we all know the adaptive filter of the AEC relies on the synchronization of the far-end and near-end sampling rates. Then Has anybody tried to use speex AEC in Windows system? How do you solve this problem? (I have tested speex AEC. In most

Andrew Clinton wrote: > Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable > to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 > is the culprit: > > ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); > const SCEV *S = SE.getMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L); > if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(S)) > return

I’ve been playing around with optimizing performance various passes and noticed something about ADCE: it keeps an Alive set that requires a lot of upkeep time-wise, but if each instruction had a /single bit/ of side data (to represent liveness, solely within the pass), the set wouldn’t be needed. I tested this out and observed a ~1/3 reduction in time in ADCE: 1454ms to 982ms according to a

Hi Shahzad, > Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 > along with dragonegg plugin? sure, try this: gcc -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so ...other_options_here... -S -o - -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=0 | opt -pass1 -pass2 ... Here -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir tells it to output LLVM IR rather than target assembler.

Hi?Jean-Marc? Thanks for your suggestions very much! > > I am porting speex on ARM7TDMI, I have done some optimization, the > > result is that the encoder and decoder need about 60 MCPS for 5.96kbps > > bitrate and complexity 0. Can someone give me informtion about Speex > > optimization on ARM7? > > That's quite good. A few suggestions here: > 1) Don't

Hi there. I have a windows 2000 Server in ADC mode. I have a samba 3 box as a domain member to the ADC where security=ADS I auth fine to this box from Windows 2000/XP clients. I see shares on the domain member with no issues. winbind works fine, in that it auth's ok etc etc Windows 98 clients are configured to log into the Bionomics domain, and do so with the W2k Server with no problems.

Hello Duncan I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is producing an error $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce $ clang *.s Regards Shahzad On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > >

Hi, > I tried it with -o - but its producing an error > > gcc: fatal error: cannot specify -o with -c, -S or -E with multiple files > > What you suggest? what I wrote: >> for F in *.c ; do B=`basename $F .c` ; gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so >> -S -o - $F -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce -o $B.ll ; done >> clang *.ll Thanks to the for loop and

Hello Duncan On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > > >> I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to >> produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is >> producing an error >> >> $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c >>