search for: adaquately

...rganization that wants it to do some call routing for them. They have a SIP provider that is going to provide one termination and one origination account. We are going to have to route a rather large number of calls (50-100,000 concurrent), but can't find any information on how to proxy calls adaquately.

I have consulted the intro and nabble but have not found an answer to what should be a simple question, here goes: I am doing a crosscheck of a data frame and pulling out a single value based on an inputted value ie based on x i will select y, or if x =2 then my code returns 7. x y 1 4 2 7 3 10 4 2 My code currently iterates through for as many times as the length of the x

Hi list, Right now I''ve to find some graphic (or web!) interface to administrate our new data center infrastructure who will be running over Xen. I''ve been googling around to find something, and looks like Enomaly is a good choice. Can anybody give me some feedback about this? Or maybe recommend another front-end interface? Thanks in advance. Boris.

I want to be able to do something like this (for example): class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :friends def friends(living_in = :uk) # filter based on parameters here end end Is there any way I can redefine the accessor for an association whilst still being able to get the values? Basically, I''m looking for an equivilent of read_attribute() for associations. --

Effective today, Shorewall is adopting a new release model which is patterned after the one used in the Linux Kernel. 1. Releases continue to have a three-level identification x.y.z (e.g., 2.0.3). 2. The first two levels (x.y) designate the Major Release Number (e.g., 2.0) 3. The third level (z) designates the Minor Release Number. 4. Even numbered major releases (e.g., 1.4,

...duced in SnapShot 20030821 has changed -- see the User Set page for details. 3) The per-interface dynamic blacklisting facility from previous 1.4.6 Snapshots has been removed. The implications of the facility for users with dial-up internet connections were too complicated to document adaquately. My apologies for unleashing this half-baked idea on the user base. New Features: 1) The 2.6 series of Linux kernels will not support the ''unclean'' match extension except in Patch-O-Matic. In keeping with the Shorewall policy of not supporting netfilter extensions that...

...oduced in SnapShot 20030821 has changed -- see the User Set page for details. 3) The per-interface dynamic blacklisting facility from previous 1.4.6 Snapshots has been removed. The implications of the facility for users with dial-up internet connections were too complicated to document adaquately. My apologies for unleashing this half-baked idea on the user base. New Features: 1) The 2.6 series of Linux kernels will not support the ''unclean'' match extension except in Patch-O-Matic. In keeping with the Shorewall policy of not supporting netfilter extensions that...

Felix du Plessis Tel:               +27 (0) 12 640 0135  Fax:              +27 (0) 12 640 0151 Mobile:       +27 (0) 83 457 8718 -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of xen-users-request@lists.xen.org Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 2:00 PM To: xen-users@lists.xen.org Subject: Xen-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 32 Send

Hi, I am new to virtualization and I am having the obvious hassle of choosing between Xen and KVM. Can Xen experts help me with this? Regards, Arindam _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: wishlist The "xendomains" init script will start domains according to the order of config files found in /etc/xen/auto/*. I use this so that, in the event of a hard reboot, the more important domains will start first. Some of these contain essential services like DNS resolvers, slapd and so on, and since starting xen domains

Hello mailing list! I have been working with XCP a little bit, and I have the impression that this distro is insecure. First, it does not look like update repositories are enabled inside /etc/yum.repos.d, although I''m from an apt background so I may be misinterpreting that. Where will my security updates come from? Next, it appears that the root password hash is directly stored inside