search for: adacs

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "adacs".

Did you mean: dacs
2002 Apr 01
3
Cannot delete a file on 2.4.18
Hi, I get the error "Operation not permitted" when I try to delete a file as root, see some commands below. - there is no "i" attribute - it's a problem with the files and not the upper directories since I can delete a similar file in the same directory - fsck -f doesn't find any error on the partition - the partition is mounted rw If this is not the right place to
2007 May 03
0
Re: 3.0.23d UNIX vs. AD group permissions
...he SAMBA server is not honouring the UNIX file system permissions. My groups listing in UNIX: [root@chrome samba]$ groups dpullman melsaunx wwwmel melsa gss gssreq office root sensor lp melsapw sa webgroup admin tac The test directory: [root@chrome testing]$ ls -al total 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 carolyn adacs 512 May 3 13:12 . drwxr-xr-x 8 root sys 512 Jan 5 13:37 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 dpullman adacs 0 May 3 13:12 New Text Document.txt The directory is owned by a different user and a group that I'm not a member of in UNIX. I am a member of this group in AD. Yet it al...
2007 Jan 11
3
3.0.23d UNIX vs. AD group permissions
...I was able to create files and directories in a directory that had this new group. I'm not the owner of the directory, or a member of the group, and other has only r-x. ****Even though I am not permitted to do this in UNIX**** [root@chrome testing]$ ls -al . total 8 drwxrwsr-x 4 carolyn adacs 512 Jan 11 11:35 . drwxr-xr-x 8 root sys 512 Jan 5 13:37 .. drwxr-sr-x 2 dpullman adacs 512 Jan 11 11:35 New Folder [root@chrome testing]$ groups dpullman melsaunx wwwmel melsa gss gssreq office root sensor lp melsapw sa webgroup admin tac Isn't there a stateme...
2008 Feb 24
3
Fwd: Re: Xen 3.1, Fedora 8 and PCI passthrough
---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1, Fedora 8 and PCI passthrough Date: Sunday 24 February 2008 From: jim burns <jim_burn@bellsouth.net> To: deshantm@gmail.com On Friday 22 February 2008 09:34:17 pm Todd Deshane wrote: > The configuration in both python and SXP format is covered in the xen user > manual [0]. > > Fedora still does make a
2002 Mar 07
0
3.1 not there
The mirror links point to openssh-3.1p1.tar.gz, but none of the sites have the file. The Linux RPM files are there though. Just thought you'd like to know, if you don't already. MB -- Mike Brown (mbrown at adacgeo.com) (Soon to be: Michael.L.Brown at Philips.com) ADAC, Madison, WI (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems) Desk: 608-288-6969 Fax: 608-298-2101 You design it, I'll build
2023 Oct 22
1
Question about silos and Authentication policies
Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks
2023 Oct 23
2
Question about silos and Authentication policies
Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >
2023 Oct 18
2
Question about silos and Authentication policies
I just installed Samba 4.19.1 (Sernet-packages). Here is my smb.conf on my DC ----------------- # Global parameters [global] ad dc functional level = 2016 netbios name = ADDC-01 realm = EXAMPLE.NET server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
2023 Oct 23
2
Question about silos and Authentication policies
Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so