search for: actullay

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "actullay".

2009 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] alias analysis results
...a NoAlias: i32* %0, i32** %kk NoAlias: i32* %0, i32** %jj Function: main: 2 pointers, 1 call sites NoAlias: i32* %0, i32* %retval NoModRef: Ptr: i32* %retval <-> call void @test() nounwind NoModRef: Ptr: i32* %0 <-> call void @test() nounwind I actullay would expect the more accurate results from applying anders-aa, but I could not interpret what has been returned - at least I should see something like jj->aa, right? Maybe I missed something out, could someone on the mailing list share some thoughts? Thanks a lot! Weihua
2009 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] alias analysis results
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Weihua Sheng <weihua.sheng at gmail.com> wrote: > I actullay would expect the more accurate results from applying > anders-aa, but I could not interpret what has been returned - at least > I should see something like jj->aa, right? I'm not quite following... jj and aa don't alias; both versions show that. The results returned for anders-aa...
2005 Jul 19
2
Re: vorbis file decoding problems
hi , As i had stated before , i am having problems with ov_open() which returns -132 error. i have uploaded the project file in rar format. it is a vc++ project file, can someone please check out the error and tell me where i am going wrong... http://sr2.mytempdir.com/89384 Thanks and regards sam
2009 May 15
1
[LLVMdev] alias analysis results
...ias (that's what I understand from C and possibly could see from bc)? Thanks a lot again! Weihua On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Weihua Sheng <weihua.sheng at gmail.com> wrote: >> I actullay would expect the more accurate results from applying >> anders-aa, but I could not interpret what has been returned - at least >> I should see something like jj->aa, right? > > I'm not quite following... jj and aa don't alias; both versions show > that.  The results...
2014 Jan 04
1
sudo issues after upgrading to samba/winbind 4.0.13 on Debian Wheezy
Hi I have upgraded from samba 3.6.19 to samba 4.0.13 on Debian Wheezy 64-bit with Samba 4.0.13 from wheezy-backports. I use winbind to authenticate against a two-server AD domain on Server 2012 functional level and forced LDAPS. After upgrading from 3.6.19 to 4.0.13 everything still works for me as usual. That is samba shares authentication, all things relying on the keytab, SSO logins with SSH