search for: actual

Some wavelet analysis experts have implemented periodic boundary conditions for signals. I need to implement a circular buffer. Something like: "12345abcdefgh12345abcdefgh" so that at each step the riightmost element is moved to the leftmost index and everything else is properly shifted: "h12345abcdefgh12345abcdefg", "gh12345abcdefgh12345abcdef", .... My

...ot;execute" : "balloon", "arguments": { "value" : 1073672192 } } {"return": {}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272173, "microseconds": 88667}, \ "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272174, "microseconds": 89704}, \ "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272175, "microseconds&...

...************************************************************************************************ #I have a series of simulated values, which are means sim <- c(0.0012,0.0009,2,2,9,12,0.0009,2,19,1,1,0.0013,1,0.0009,0.0009,1,26,3,1,2,1,0.0009,1,0.2323,4,2,0.0009,0.0009,0.0009,52,49,1,3,7) #and actual values actual <- c(0,0,2,0,13,20,0,3,38,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,27,2,0,0,1,0,1,0,4,2,0,0,0,54,21,0,4,11) #The "X" axes is family, ranging from 1-35, where the "Y" axes is sim and actual values. #What i want to do is plot the simulated values with the 95% CI values, and then plot the...

...eating my own panel function for lattice graphics, and despite all of my online research and pouring through the documentation, I cannot figure out how to solve my particular problem. Hopefully, a generous fellow R user can help. I have some data that is split into two groups: some "actual" data, and some simulated data, generated from several different models. The actual data come from two different datasets (calibration and holdout), and the simulations were calibrated on each data set under the various models. What I want to do is create a boxplot on the simulated d...

...ot;execute" : "balloon", "arguments": { "value" : 1073672192 } } {"return": {}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272173, "microseconds": 88667}, \ "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272174, "microseconds": 89704}, \ "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272175, "microseconds&...

..."balloon", "arguments": { "value" : 1073672192 } } > {"return": {}} > {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272173, "microseconds": 88667}, \ > "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} > {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272174, "microseconds": 89704}, \ > "event": "BALLOON_CHANGE", "data": {"actual": 1073610752}} > {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1693272175, &...

...ll see it . Description of the problem: When the virsh setmem command is used to inflate (or deflate) the balloon on a VM to which 8GB of MaxMemory or more are allocated then the information reported with virsh dominfo , virsh dumpxml after the balloon change has been performed are wrong. The actual balloon is inflated correctly though and that is verifiable both in the vm itself and through the "virsh dommemstat" commands. Platform is Centos 6.4 (problem was present in 6.3 as well starting with libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6.3.7 ) The patch that actually is causing the problem is patch nu...

...- * considerably more flexible and easier to use than - * qemu-img, so create the disk explicitly using libguestfs - * then pass the 'qemu-img convert -n' option so qemu reuses - * the disk. - * - * Also we allow the output mode to actually create the disk - * image. This lets the output mode set ownership and - * permissions correctly if required. - *) - (* What output preallocation mode should we use? *) - let preallocation = - match t.target_format, output_alloc with -...

How to measure memory utilizatin of guest when dommemstat reports "RSS" is more than "ACTUAL"? Following is the output on RHEL 6.6 # dommemstat 1 actual 16777216 rss 16890372 # dommemstat 2 actual 16777216 rss 16460516 I found following article on Redhat which suggests that this is normal/expected? https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2017943 Now we use following formula to...

All, In dealing with the changes to should in the should_be_working_like_ruby branch, I am reminded that while we got the following to work ... actual.should_be < value actual.should_be <= value actual.should == value actual.should =~ value actual.should_be >= value actual.should_be > value ... we were not able to get this to work: actual.should != value Here''s what the test looked like: context "should[_be] <arbi...

Hey guys, Does anyone have any wisdom to share on the subject of speccing Rails layouts? Most of it''s plain old view specs stuff, but are there sensible ways to verify things like the yield call? (Mocking doesn''t catch that) Thanks, Matt -- Matt Patterson | Design & Code <matt at reprocessed org> | http://www.reprocessed.org/

I have the following data set, representing the the estimated number of some event (est), when the actual number was 3, 4, ..., 15. The numbers in the cells are the observed *frequencies* of each combination of (actual, estimated), so each column (a3 -- a15) gives a single discrete frequency distribution. Thus, when the actual number was 6, the estimated values were 5,6,7 with frequencies 7, 120, 2...

..._balloon.h index 4b0488f..71ef93b 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ struct virtio_balloon_config { /* Number of pages host wants Guest to give up. */ - __le32 num_pages; + __u32 num_pages; /* Number of pages we've actually got in balloon. */ - __le32 actual; + __u32 actual; }; #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_SWAP_IN 0 /* Amount of memory swapped in */ @@ -51,9 +51,16 @@ struct virtio_balloon_config { #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MEMTOT 5 /* Total amount of memory */ #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR 6 +/* Legac...

..._balloon.h index 4b0488f..71ef93b 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ struct virtio_balloon_config { /* Number of pages host wants Guest to give up. */ - __le32 num_pages; + __u32 num_pages; /* Number of pages we've actually got in balloon. */ - __le32 actual; + __u32 actual; }; #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_SWAP_IN 0 /* Amount of memory swapped in */ @@ -51,9 +51,16 @@ struct virtio_balloon_config { #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MEMTOT 5 /* Total amount of memory */ #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR 6 +/* Legac...

....199.164) In the following example (and many other cases): quote(a=1) # 1 the argument matching is apparently incorrect wrt. the documentation (The R Language Definition, v 2.8.1, sec. 4.3.2, p. 23), which specifies the following algorithm for argument matching: 1. Attempt to match named actual arguments to formal arguments exactly. 2. For the arguments remaining from step 1, attempt to match named actual arguments to formal arguments partially. 3. For the arguments remaining from step 1, collectively match all unnamed actual arguments to the formal argument '...', if available. 4...

(Moving to LLVM-dev). I hope thats ok to just move the conversation over from commits. To summarise, selection DAG crashes if personality functions are not actually functions. This conversation is to try work out if that is a restriction we want to document in LangRef, or (as David B suggests), we should allow opaque values to be personality functions. I don’t actually know EH code at all, so I don’t know what the right answer is. > On Aug 31, 2015, at...

Hi, May be you can try this: obj_name<- load("arun.RData") Pred1<- get(obj_name[1]) Actual1<- get(obj_name[2]) library(reshape2) dat<-cbind(melt(Pred1,id.vars="S1"),value2=melt(Actual1,id.vars="S1")[,3])? # to reshape to long form colnames(dat)[3:4]<- c("Predict","Actual") dat$variable<- as.character(dat$variable) #not that needed dat1&...

Hello all, I have what i feel is a unique situation which may not be resolved with this inquiry. I have constructed the below data set so that i may give an example of what im doing. The example works perfectly and i have no issues with it. My problem arises with my actual data, which includes another 11 columns of data (used in later analysis) and a total of about 7000 cases(rows). i mention the dimensions of the actual data because im wondering if my below process would encounter problems with more data. To be sure the problem occurs in the last step. Is$NotToo...

...ch mode I noticed that I saw 403208 bytes from the receiver in comparison to 3368 bytes with SCP. I've attached the relevant output from tcptrace below (the b->a column is the return side of the trace). Mostly I'm just curious as to what is generating so much return traffic for SFTP? Actually, now that I think about it, why almost an additional 9000 packets* for SFTP on the sending side as well? Is it just some artifact of my network that I didn't pick up on or does the sftp mechanism require this? Thanks! Chris Rapier *I didn't disable TSO before taking these dumps so...

...an, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > > You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. > Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call > JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. > > I haven't actually tried this, but it seems to be the only way to use > this API, so I presume someone else has. The only potential problem I > can forsee is if the JIT isn't actually re-entrant. I actually tried that several months ago and, it turned out, the JIT wasn't actually reentrant and didn...