search for: activetly

This should be easy but it does not work I have 3 vectors*(activeT,inactT, activeR)*, the idea is that if the last value in inactT is higher than the last in activeT this value has to be append in active T and the last value in another vector call activeR has to be repeated. (at the bottom you can find the vectors) I have done this: activeT=round(as.numeric(activeT)) inactT=

Hi, I have a php software installed on a centos server with selinux enforced activeted. The php software (glpi --> http://www.glpi-project.org) have a plugin that must write on a temp dir... but selinux dont give access to that dir to write. How should i do ? lewis

...re sense. We totally missed this on our (release) radar. And indeed, we're shipping the upstream completion file now. Adi, I see how you're improving it, and I like it. So, we should probably ship this instead, but at the same time, the right (tm) place to move this is upstream. We're activetly trying to get rid of "adjusted copies of upstream stuff" in the packaging. Would you mind making an upstream patch out of this? I can help with that if needed. Then it gets proper review, and upstream can maintain it when commands are added/changed etc. Thanks, Hans

Hi, I've recently had the following experience, which may be of help to people here, so I'm mentioning my tests and conclusions. I've recently been observing this behaviour from Samba - this is an easily reproducible problem:- 1/ Open a share 2/ Create a new document in Word. 3/ Make some changes. 4/ Save the document using the save icon on the toolbar, this works as expected. 5/

.... > > And indeed, we're shipping the upstream completion file now. Adi, I see > how you're improving it, and I like it. I'm happy you like it... > So, we should probably ship this instead, but at the same time, the > right (tm) place to move this is upstream. We're activetly trying to get > rid of "adjusted copies of upstream stuff" in the packaging. I think it would be great if you could ship that for Buster because I don't think upstream will merge it within the next month... ;-) > Would you mind making an upstream patch out of this? I can help w...

HI, I tried to configure Asterisk 1.8 on one of my test-hosts. I've installed from centos-asterisk.repo (http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/$releasever/tested/$basearch/): Nov 26 15:34:56 Installed: asterisk-sounds-core-en-gsm-1.4.20-1_centos5.noarch Nov 26 15:34:59 Installed: asterisk18-core-1.8.0-1_centos5.i386 Nov 26 15:35:02 Installed: asterisk18-voicemail-1.8.0-1_centos5.i386 Nov 26