Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "activeservice".
2008 Jun 30
18
Unable to remove GPLPV drivers without breaking win2k3 domU
I have a Win2K3 domU (and thankfully an image backup of the LVM volume
that holds its system disk) I previously installed GPLPV v0.8.9 drivers,
the domU boots OK with or without the /GPLPV switch in boot.ini, however
with the /GPLPV switch it tries and fails to use the Xen network driver,
and so the machine is network-less, so for the past few months I''ve left
it using pure HVM
2005 Mar 03
2
mbox or maildir?
I am using dovecot in an SMEServer (aka e-smith), and recently backed-up
on one system and restored on another system the imap email
directories. The trouble was that dovecot "guessed" the mail type
wrongly, and I ended up with "empty" ~/Mail directories (did it create
or populate these?), and full, but ignored ~/Maildir directories for
every user.
Could someone point me
2004 May 21
3
"important" flag
I'm wondering what I'd need to do to get the "important" flag set on an
incoming message according to a pre-specified header.
I know the problem of this not being a "joined-up" feature in standard
email, but in practice many MUAs set headers like X-priority etc, and IMAP
has an "important" flag that is the obvious mapping.
I'm not really sure where
2004 Mar 31
0
Mulberry problem
I've been chasing a problem with Mulberry which now actually seems to be a
Dovecot server bug.
The problem manifests itself when manipulating embedded rfc822 messages,
and the analysis comes down to the fact that a FETCH BODY[2] command
returns the same thing as FETCH BODY[2.1]. Both return just the text of the
embedded message, whereas FETCH BODY[2] should return everything including
2004 Apr 03
0
Bug fix - message/rfc822 attachments
Greetings
I've attached a patch that fixes a bug in Dovecot relating to rfc822
attachments. This problem shows up in Mulberry (which hammers the IMAP
protocol more than most!).
The problem is that FETCH BODY[n], where "n" is the number for the
message/rfc822 part, returns the wrong information. It returns the message
without the headers, whereas it should return the entire
2004 Apr 26
2
Index abuse
How resilient is Dovecot's indexing mechanism? (seeing as it's been
extensively re-vamped I guess this question may have different answers for
0.99 & 1.0).
To put it in context, I'm playing with server-side automatic maintenance
scripts for things like deleting messages more than x days old from folders
a, b, c, etc. (using Maildir layout). So far I'm just zapping files in