search for: action_flag

...pectively */ @@ -1249,11 +1248,29 @@ CPU_copy: if (pPriv->currentHostBuffer != NO_PRIV_HOST_BUFFER_AVAILABLE) pPriv->currentHostBuffer ^= 1; - /* If we're not using the hw overlay, we're rendering into a pixmap - * and need to take a couple of additional steps... - */ - if (!(action_flags & USE_OVERLAY)) { - ppix = NVGetDrawablePixmap(pDraw); + if (action_flags & USE_OVERLAY) { + if (pNv->Architecture == NV_ARCH_04) { + NV04PutOverlayImage(pScrn, pPriv->video_mem, offset, + id, dstPitch, &dstBox, 0, 0, + xb, yb, npixels, nlines, + src_w...

...; safer/cleaner. > > That may not be easy or enough to check if hw_ctx/tag_sets are > fully initialized if you mean all requests have been used one time. > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 PM, David Hildenbrand > > I was playing with a simple patch that just sets cmd_flags and action_flags to > > What is action_flags? atomic_flags, sorry :) Otherwise e.g. REQ_ATOM_STARTED could already be set due to the randomness. I am not sure if this is really necessary, or if it is completely shielded by the tag-handling code, but seemed to be clean for me to do it (and I remember it no...

...; safer/cleaner. > > That may not be easy or enough to check if hw_ctx/tag_sets are > fully initialized if you mean all requests have been used one time. > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 PM, David Hildenbrand > > I was playing with a simple patch that just sets cmd_flags and action_flags to > > What is action_flags? atomic_flags, sorry :) Otherwise e.g. REQ_ATOM_STARTED could already be set due to the randomness. I am not sure if this is really necessary, or if it is completely shielded by the tag-handling code, but seemed to be clean for me to do it (and I remember it no...

On 2014-09-17 07:52, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:00:34 +0200 > David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Does anyone have an idea? >>>>>> The request itself is completely filled with cc >>>>> >>>>> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be

On 2014-09-17 07:52, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:00:34 +0200 > David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Does anyone have an idea? >>>>>> The request itself is completely filled with cc >>>>> >>>>> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be

...d yet. But I think this is > safer/cleaner. That may not be easy or enough to check if hw_ctx/tag_sets are fully initialized if you mean all requests have been used one time. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 PM, David Hildenbrand > I was playing with a simple patch that just sets cmd_flags and action_flags to What is action_flags? > 0. That should already be sufficient to hinder blk_mq_tag_to_rq and the calling > method to do the wrong thing. Yes, clearing rq->cmd_flags should be enough. And looks better to move rq initialization to __blk_mq_free_request() too, otherwise timeout still m...

int i is accessed outside immediate scope so leave declaration at the highest common scope level: 1073: int ret, i; ... // Highest common scope ... 1193: if (newTTSize <= destination_buffer->size) { ... // Used in this scope ... 1248: } else { ... // Used in this scope ... 1316: }

...at gmail.com> --- src/nouveau_xv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/nouveau_xv.c b/src/nouveau_xv.c index 1afe2f1..9d955e0 100644 --- a/src/nouveau_xv.c +++ b/src/nouveau_xv.c @@ -1366,7 +1366,7 @@ CPU_copy: pPriv->currentBuffer ^= 1; } else if (action_flags & USE_TEXTURE) { - int ret = BadImplementation; + ret = BadImplementation; if (pNv->Architecture == NV_ARCH_30) { ret = NV30PutTextureImage(pScrn, pPriv->video_mem, -- 2.19.1

> >>> Does anyone have an idea? > >>> The request itself is completely filled with cc > >> > >> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be > >> valid, and rq->q shouldn't have been changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently

> >>> Does anyone have an idea? > >>> The request itself is completely filled with cc > >> > >> That is very weird, the 'rq' is got from hctx->tags, and rq should be > >> valid, and rq->q shouldn't have been changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently

...tion_stfl; + u32 instruction_sigp_sense; + u32 instruction_sigp_emergency; + u32 instruction_sigp_stop; + u32 instruction_sigp_arch; + u32 instruction_sigp_prefix; + u32 instruction_sigp_restart; }; struct io_info { @@ -161,6 +167,10 @@ struct interrupt_info { }; }; +/* for local_interrupt.action_flags */ +#define ACTION_STORE_ON_STOP 1 +#define ACTION_STOP_ON_STOP 2 + struct local_interrupt { spinlock_t lock; struct list_head list; @@ -168,6 +178,8 @@ struct local_interrupt { struct float_interrupt *float_int; int timer_due; /* event indicator for waitqueue below */ wait_queue_head_...

This patch series introduces a backend for kvm to run on IBM System z machines that uses the mainframe's sie virtualization capability. This work runs 64bit guests on z800/z890/z900/z990/z9/z10 class machines with a 64bit linux host. Userspace will follow once we're done brushing it over. The patch queue consists of the following patches, which can be applied in sequence on top of kvm.git

This patch series introduces a backend for kvm to run on IBM System z machines that uses the mainframe's sie virtualization capability. This work runs 64bit guests on z800/z890/z900/z990/z9/z10 class machines with a 64bit linux host. Userspace will follow once we're done brushing it over. The patch queue consists of the following patches, which can be applied in sequence on top of kvm.git