search for: acpi_processor_start

...y in use when CPU_FREQ is configured off (and I have to admit that while I didn''t try it, I suspect it doesn''t even work when CPU_FREQ is on - this is because the apparently only reporting function, processor_extcntl_get_performance(), is being called exclusively in the context of acpi_processor_start()). With that I wonder how I would be able to determine whether the code works at all. As a minor observation, I also find the naming vs. meaning of the FREQCTL_none enumerator misleading - shouldn''t this rather be FREQCTL_xen? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-de...

.... > >>>admit that while I didn''t try it, I suspect it doesn''t even work when >>>CPU_FREQ is on - this is because the apparently only reporting >>>function, processor_extcntl_get_performance(), is being called >>>exclusively in the context of acpi_processor_start()). With that I >>>wonder how I would be able to determine whether the code works >>>at all. >> >>Not sure about your concern. Currently xen-controlled cpufreq isn''t >>enabled by default. User needs pass xen cmdline and also enable >>dom0 CPU_FREQ....

...00a4ff>] :processor:acpi_processor_get_throttling+0x45/0x6a [ 6.583593] [<ffffffffa000b058>] ? :processor:acpi_processor_get_throttling_info+0x47a/0x544 [ 6.583593] [<ffffffff803434ed>] ? acpi_evaluate_object+0x1f0/0x203 [ 6.583593] [<ffffffffa000d8bd>] ? :processor:acpi_processor_start+0x585/0x6f8 [ 6.583593] [<ffffffff802d52d8>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x1b/0x2f [ 6.583593] [<ffffffff8034d44b>] ? acpi_start_single_object+0x21/0x45 [ 6.583593] [<ffffffff8034eaa9>] ? acpi_device_probe+0x7d/0x90 [ 6.583593] [<ffffffff80378c34>] ? driver_probe_dev...