search for: acpi_boot_init

...ally insert the range into the E820 table, and enable the range only when the insertion actually works without conflict. Further, the actual enabling of the space is done from identify_cpu(), which means that acpi_mmcfg_init() muts be called after that function (and hance should not be called from acpi_boot_init()). Otherwise, Dom0 would be able to use MMCFG, but Xen wouldn''t. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c @@ -832,8 +832,6 @@ int __init acpi_boot_init(void) acpi_dmar_init(); - acpi_mmcfg_init(); - erst...

...dress, + bgrt_tbl->image_offset_x, bgrt_tbl->image_offset_y); + bgrt_tbl->status &= ~1; + + return 0; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP #define acpi_fadt_copy_address(dst, src, len) do { \ if (fadt->header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID) \ @@ -653,5 +672,7 @@ int __init acpi_boot_init(void) erst_init(); + acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BGRT, acpi_invalidate_bgrt); + return 0; } --- a/xen/include/acpi/actbl.h +++ b/xen/include/acpi/actbl.h @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum acpi_prefered_pm_profiles { #include <acpi/actbl1.h> #include <acpi/actbl2.h> +#include <acpi/...

...| 1 xen/include/xen/spinlock.h | 7 13 files changed, 1697 insertions(+) diff -r b622e411eef8 xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c Thu Jun 24 21:56:03 2010 +0100 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c Fri Aug 20 17:38:07 2010 +0800 @@ -938,6 +938,8 @@ int __init acpi_boot_init(void) acpi_mmcfg_init(); + erst_init(); + return 0; } diff -r b622e411eef8 xen/drivers/acpi/Makefile --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/Makefile Thu Jun 24 21:56:03 2010 +0100 +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/Makefile Fri Aug 20 17:38:07 2010 +0800 @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ subdir-y += tables subdir-y +...

...gt;version, bgrt_tbl->image_address); + bgrt_tbl->image_address = 0; + bgrt_tbl->status &= ~1; + + return 0; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP #define acpi_fadt_copy_address(dst, src, len) do { \ if (fadt->header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID) \ @@ -653,5 +675,7 @@ int __init acpi_boot_init(void) erst_init(); + acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BGRT, acpi_invalidate_bgrt); + return 0; } --- a/xen/include/acpi/actbl.h +++ b/xen/include/acpi/actbl.h @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum acpi_prefered_pm_profiles { #include <acpi/actbl1.h> #include <acpi/actbl2.h> +#include <acpi/...

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it