search for: acltype

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "acltype".

Did you mean: acl_type
2017 Mar 06
2
samba on ZFS
...; wrote: > >> Hi Rowland, >> >> I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be >> referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. >> >> pool/myshare aclinherit restricted default >> pool/myshare acltype off default > > Samba provides a link between Samba and ZFS, see here for the manpage: > > https://fossies.org/linux/samba/docs/manpages/vfs_zfsacl.8 I am running Samba on ZFS without vfs_zfsacl, but with these zfs options: - xattr=sa - acltype=posixacl - aclinheri...
2017 Feb 16
2
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
Hi Rowland, I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. pool/myshare aclinherit restricted default pool/myshare acltype off default So, if you heard that I was going to use ext3, that was only as a solution, and that over ext4 due personal preference, since I made a mistake once on a reboot during write and suffered bad data loss. I gave up on ext4, in favor of ext3 sh...
2017 Mar 10
2
samba on ZFS
I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and sa-based xattrs. For the record, the latest version of samba that I've been successfully able to compile on FreeBSD 10.3 is Samba 4.5.5. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:17:07 +0100 >...
2020 Mar 16
4
Problems with ACLs
On 16/03/2020 01:55, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I think the error is in converting the POSIx ACl, but I don't know how to > fix this. You posted: My two DC are Samba4 (migrated of the Windows 2008 Server) and my current File Servers are Windows 2008 Server. Yet, you have a Unix domain member: netbios name = SRV-FILESERVER Is this the machine that you
2014 Sep 03
1
Effect of setting "store dos attributes = no" in Samba 4.1.11
...Re: [Samba] Effect of setting "store dos attributes = no" in Samba 4.1.11 Let's assume that the original poster meant "store dos attributes" and wants to use Windows-ACLs. Try zfs set xattr=sa $pool zfs set atime=off $pool And if you have ZFS version 0.6.3 try zfs set acltype=posixacl $pool
2017 Mar 11
1
samba on ZFS
...Mar 2017 08:18:26 +0100 "Niels Dettenbach \(Syndicat IT & Internet\) via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and > >sa-based > > If you want to see a working samba / zfs / FreeBSD AD / PDC > "ecosystem" i recommend just trying and exploring the open FreeBSD > based "FreeNAS" which offers / allows exactly this. > > We run several Samba 4 with ACL / AD...
2018 Sep 12
2
Cannot set Windows ACL security permissions Ubuntu 18.04 LXD privileged container
...untu 16.04 LTS inside a LXD privileged container on the same host as above. Second AD DC = Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu on Ubuntu 18.04 inside a privileged container on same host. The underlying file system is zfs-on-linux and in all cases I set the following zfs attributes: xattrs=sa aclinherit=passthrough acltype=posix A member server fs3 w/Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu also privileged on the same host. All workstations on the network are successfully joined to AD. Windows OS = 10 1803, But RSAT is 17xx b/c the RSAT 1803 doesn't have the DNS tools. so I had to downgrade. All containers are "privileged"...
2016 Dec 06
4
samba 4.5.1 tdb panic with ZFS
..., and ZFS supports NFSv4 ACLs by default. Some people recommend using "--use-ntvfs" but that is deprecated and indeed removed from samba 4.5. I found a page which said to set some zfs attributes: https://morph027.gitlab.io/post/zfs-on-linux-and-samba4-acl/ root at proxmox:~# zfs set acltype=posixacl vms/subvol-107-disk-1root at proxmox:~# zfs set aclinherit=passthrough vms/subvol-107-disk-1 So I set those on my container, but I now get a different error: root at wrn-dc1:~# samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --realm=AD.EXAMPLE.N...
2017 Feb 16
0
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
...; > I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be > referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. > > pool/myshare aclinherit > restricted default > pool/myshare acltype > off default Samba provides a link between Samba and ZFS, see here for the manpage: https://fossies.org/linux/samba/docs/manpages/vfs_zfsacl.8 > > So, if you heard that I was going to use ext3, that was only as a > solution, and that over ext4 due pe...
2017 Mar 11
0
samba on ZFS
Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and >sa-based If you want to see a working samba / zfs / FreeBSD AD / PDC "ecosystem" i recommend just trying and exploring the open FreeBSD based "FreeNAS" which offers / allows exactly this. We run several Samba 4 with ACL / AD (managed by MS RSAT) on FreeNAS, wh...
2016 Dec 06
2
samba 4.5.1 tdb panic with ZFS
On 06/12/2016 16:06, Brian Candler wrote: > Ah OK... I've just seen Rowland's reply, "Just don't use ZFS". That's > clear enough :-) FYI, I rebuilt the system using btrfs but initially I got the same issue [^1] It turns out this came from running inside an unprivileged lxd container. After setting "security.privileged true" it was happy. So I guess
2020 Mar 16
1
Problems with ACLs
Am 3/16/20 um 3:04 PM schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Am 3/16/20 um 2:59 PM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 16/03/2020 13:50, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> Is this the machine that you cannot set the permissions on ? >>> Yes. >>> >>>> If so, what is the filesystem ? >>> Ext4 for SO and Ext4 for
2019 Dec 25
3
Setting ACLs with smbcacls fails (partly)
...xc host --------------------- ---- ZFS is setup as follows: ??? root at proxmox02:/etc/pve/lxc# zfs get xattr hdd_zfs_guests/home ??? NAME???????????????? PROPERTY? VALUE? SOURCE ??? hdd_zfs_guests/home? xattr???? sa???? inherited from hdd_zfs_guests ??? root at proxmox02:/etc/pve/lxc# zfs get acltype hdd_zfs_guests/home ??? NAME???????????????? PROPERTY? VALUE???? SOURCE ??? hdd_zfs_guests/home? acltype?? posixacl? local ??? root at proxmox02:/etc/pve/lxc# zfs get aclinherit hdd_zfs_guests/home ??? NAME???????????????? PROPERTY??? VALUE????????? SOURCE ??? hdd_zfs_guests/home? aclinherit?...
2023 Jun 28
1
rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95)
Hello rsync users, I'm trying to copy every file which belongs to my Ubuntu 23.04 installation (stored on an ext4 fs to a ZFS storage disk. The command that I've used is : # rsync -avxHAX * /mnt/zroot2/zroot2/OS/Linux/EVO sending incremental file list rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95) rsync: [generator] set_acl:
2018 May 01
0
Finding performance bottlenecks
Hi, So is the KVM or Vmware as the host(s)? I basically have the same setup ie 3 x 1TB "raid1" nodes and VMs, but 1gb networking. I do notice with vmware using NFS disk was pretty slow (40% of a single disk) but this was over 1gb networking which was clearly saturating. Hence I am moving to KVM to use glusterfs hoping for better performance and bonding, it will be interesting to see
2018 Apr 30
3
Finding performance bottlenecks
Hi I'm trying to setup a 3 node gluster, and am hitting huge performance bottlenecks. The 3 servers are connected over 10GB and glusterfs is set to create a 3 node replica. With a single VM performance was poor, but I could have lived with it. I tried to stress it by putting copies of a bunch of VMs on the servers and seeing what happened with parallel nodes.. network load never broke
2017 Feb 16
4
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
Hi David, Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it. I then went to contig, `contig -n X:\share\sparesefile 0`, as well as a few other size. Maybe im using it wrong, but some testing on contig has only "Access is denied" when I try
2017 May 04
4
[PATCH 0/3] generator: Allow returned strings to be annotated as devices.
If we want to permit more than 255 drives to be added, then we will have to add the disks to the same virtio-scsi target using different unit (LUN) numbers. Unfortunately SCSI LUN enumeration in the Linux is not deterministic (eg. two disks with target=0, lun=[0,1] can be enumerated as /dev/sda or /dev/sdb randomly). Dealing with that will require some very complex device name translation on the
2017 Apr 21
0
[PATCH 1/2] generator: Simplify the handling of string parameters.
...[["rm_rf"; "/lost+found"]; @@ -8146,7 +8146,7 @@ which we try to create the C<lost+found> directory." }; { defaults with name = "acl_get_file"; added = (1, 19, 63); - style = RString "acl", [Pathname "path"; String "acltype"], []; + style = RString "acl", [String (Pathname, "path"); String (PlainString, "acltype")], []; optional = Some "acl"; shortdesc = "get the POSIX ACL attached to a file"; longdesc = "\ @@ -8171,7 +8171,7 @@ C<path&gt...
2017 Apr 21
4
[PATCH 0/2] generator: Simplify the handling of string parameters.
Very large but mechanical change to the generator. Rich.