search for: acltool

...I?ve started wondering if perhaps there is some better way I _should_ use instead? Something that doesn?t gets in the way and re-orders ACLs under my feet for example... ( Problems with ACLs being reordered: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14397 ) My tool: https://github.com/ptrrkssn/acltool - Peter > On 27 May 2020, at 16:18, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:36:18PM +0200, Peter Eriksson via samba wrote: >> I?ve been writing some code that uses libsmbclient to talk to SMB servers >> and I?m a little bit confused why...

hi all, i have download the latest verion of samba (2.2.5) and acltools from bestbits. i would use an fileserver with acl support, but i have some problems. after uncompress the tar-archiv i type in the sourcedirectory: ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support and i get the following: "checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl....

compatible with XFS in the package-description) Further I installed the xfs-packages that came with woody: xfsdump_2.0.1-1, xfsprogs_2.0.3-1 and xfslibs-dev_2.0.3-1. Because getfacl and setfacl were missing I downloaded the acltools from SGI and compiled debian binaries with "rules binary" and installed them (acl_2.0.9-1, libacl1_2.0.9-1 and acl-dev_2.0.9_1). FINALLY, I've downloaded the sambasources 2.2.5 and modified the "rules"-file from the packaging directories to compile with-acl-support. But c...

...was added to ZFS. It interfaces with ZFS own ACL mechanisms through wrappers. Two sets of unit tests were implemented. First, to test permission checks, was implemented as a part of fstest, tools/regression/fstest/tests/granular. Second, an "utility-level" test, is in tools/regression/acltools. It checks behaviour from the command-line point of view. It verifies the correct behaviour of getfacl(1), setfacl(1), cp(1) and mv(1) utilities (which obviously requires correct operation of the libc part), as well as recomputing ACLs on mode change, recomputing mode on ACL change, and ACL inhe...

I?ve been writing some code that uses libsmbclient to talk to SMB servers and I?m a little bit confused why ?smbc_stat()? sets the st_uid & st_gid to the uid & gid of the process calling it, instead of trying to map the real owner & group of the path or setting it to -1:-1 if it can?t do that... But there is probably some good reason for this? Ie, if I call something like this: >

...te: Fri Sep 23 14:00:14 2011 -0400 autoconf: bump version to 5.1.1 for interim builds Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at samba.org> commit f9df5f8e629176db7a1812f7914a45e2977c3e4c Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton at samba.org> Date: Sat Sep 24 08:01:16 2011 -0400 acltools: install them in $bindir, not $sbindir Move the manpages to section 1 since getcifsacl and setcifsacl are user, not sysadmin tools. Get rid of the useless sed calls on the manpages. They don't have any explicit paths in them that need replacing. Also get rid of the &q...