search for: acl_typ

Hi, I am using puppet version 0.25.1. Currently when i am starting the server, i am getting the below error. err: undefined method `acl_type'' for nil:NilClass Previously i was getting err: Forbidden request: I added the auth.conf to allow all, and this issue fixed. Please help me. Regards, Shameem -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To pos...

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

...quot;, line 1681, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1628, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) Regards, Min Wai

...l, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, no IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, no symtimes /tmp/rtest$ aclget ./a/file * * ACL_type AIXC * attributes: base permissions owner(ebambach): rw- group(staff): r-- others: r-- extended permissions enabled permit rwx u:myuser /tmp/rtest$ aclget ./b/file * * ACL_type AIXC * attributes: base permissions owner(ebambach): rw- group(staff): r--...

...l, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, no IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, no symtimes /tmp/rtest$ aclget ./a/file * * ACL_type AIXC * attributes: base permissions owner(ebambach): rw- group(staff): r-- others: r-- extended permissions enabled permit rwx u:myuser /tmp/rtest$ aclget ./b/file * * ACL_type AIXC * attributes: base permissions owner(ebambach): rw- group(staff): r--...

I get this error when I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) There are two GPO directories. One is the Default Domain Controllers Policy and one is the Default Domain Policy It looks like it's the Default Domain Policy that's giving me the problem -- the directory name matches the dn and sysvolcheck d...

...e 1683, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1630, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) Tried with new domain (no migrated) and then works, where is the problem? 2016-07-21 18:51 GMT+02:00 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: > Hello, > > Am 21.07.2016 um 17:18 schrieb Trenta sis: > > I have migrated samba 3 do...

...line 1646, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1603, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO file %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), os.path.join(root, name), fsacl_sddl, acl)) -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Command-samba-tool-ntacl-sysvolcheck-tp4668005.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:24 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, that is what it is designed for. Yes, and yes it does! Thank you!!

...;, line 1684, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1650, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), os.path.join(root, name), fsacl_sddl, acl)) --------------------snip-------------------- The GP container it complains about is the default domain policy. The specific subfolder is empty (!). I checked the ACLs manually and, on first sight, they seem ok to me, the Administra...

...683, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "//usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision//__init__.py", line 1640, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO file %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), os.path.join(root, name), fsacl_sddl, acl)) # samba-tool dbcheck Checking 2591 objects Checked 2591 objects (0 errors) # samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "//usr/local/samba/...

...e 1844, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1786, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl) Should sysvolreset fix this? Thanks, Chris

...line 1646, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1593, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) ad-01: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /srv/samba/sysvol/internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk/Policies/{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} O:LAG:DAD:PAR(A;...

...;, line 1646, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1593, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) Since everything looks so scary, I wanted to verify with you guys, before attempting a 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset'... I'm surprised to find permission problems, because 4.1.6 is pretty recent, and I haven't read very much issues li...

...> domainsid, direct_db_access) >> File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1630, in check_dir_acl >> raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) >> >> Tried with new domain (no migrated) and then works, where is the problem? >> >> >> >> 2016-07-21 18:51 GMT+02:00 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>&g...

...quot;, line 1674, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1621, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) That's nothing new, this was disused here many times. Today, I decided to try script (https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh) by mr. van Belle and I ended with this error: failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NO...

...y", line 1684, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1631, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) - ---------------- Running "samba-tool gpo aclcheck" exits with the following error: - ---------------- ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packag...

Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?

..., in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1624, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) root at pdc:/usr/local/samba/bin# root at pdc:/usr/local/samba/bin# gpupdate /force bash: gpupdate: command not found ^C ba/bin# root at pdc:/usr/local/samba/bin# ^C root at pdc:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(&l...

...line 1674, in check_gpos_acl domainsid, direct_db_access) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 1621, in check_dir_acl raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) I also get a not very helpful error from samba-tool gpo aclcheck: #samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/...