search for: acl_tdb

Hello, When I am using module acl_tdb and I am trying to get access to directory I am getting call trace in log.ip Best regards! /Adrian Berlin =============================================================== [2010/03/24 13:54:05.295901, 0] lib/fault.c:47(fault_report) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 15556 (3.5.1) Please read th...

Hi, I had issues using"vfs objects = acl_xattr" (possibly too old version [Version 4.13.13-Debian] for the needed "acl_xattr:security_acl_name = user.samba" option needed if running in a non-priv container). So I tried "vfs objects = acl_tdb" and found it working. In https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support I found: File systems without xattr support Note: This is not recommended!!! If you don't have a filesystem with xattr support, you can simulate it by adding the following line to your smb.conf: p...

Hi! I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr): 1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb (now I can write 22 user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users and everyone) 2. Do you plan to fix few ACLs eg. Traverse folder / Execute file (to traverse I need to enable additional permission List folder / rea...

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share...

Hello all I am now experimenting with samba 3.3.0 and acl_xattr. I can see that there is another method of storing Windows ACLs: acl_tdb. Can someone here tell me something about the relative merits and demerits of those two methods? I am using CenttOS with an ext3 filesystem. Thank you!

Hello, How to manage acl from command line when using acl_tdb module?

Hello, What is simplest way to backup/restore acl's if using acl_tdb module? Thanks.

...= yes > > att, > F?bio Cordeiro > PUC Minas > www.taichous.com > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Wolfgang [mailto:listener at may.co.at] > Enviada em: quarta-feira, 22 de setembro de 2010 10:23 > Para: samba-technical at lists.samba.org > Assunto: acl_xattr and acl_tdb does not work > > Hi, > > i have a running samba+ctdb installation with samba as a domain-member. > everything works but the acl's. The users want to be able to set > permissions on the share. glusterfs does not support extended acls, so i > am using acl_xattr. xattr is in...

...permissions using a winxp client i'll get a "Permissions Denied". It's strange that the file is also "Write Protected" in the Windows-File-Properties. At the samba-server the file's owner is the user i am using, and has 777-Rights. I have the same problem when i use acl_tdb. Does anyone have an idea? This is my config: glusterfs (xfs-backend) + ctdb Samba(3.4.8): [global] workgroup = OFFICE realm = OFFICE.MAY.CO.AT netbios name = DSLIN server string = %h server security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes...

Hi! Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb? Best regards /Adrian Berlin -- You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 250MB of Storage! http://webmail.rock.com/signup/

...I can store files, using Windows or Linux, and set new acls on the commandline of the cluster. BUT as soon as I try to set permissions via windows it fails with "the request is not supported" I use "vfs objects = acl_xattr". When I create a second share with "vfs objects = acl_tdb" ist works, but I think storing ACLS in a TDB-file is no option for large systems. Here my setup: Distribution: name it, I tried it. At the moment Debian 8 and Centos 7 Gluster-version: 7.6 from gluster.org Samba-version: SerNet Samba 4.3.1 Here my smb.conf out of the regestry: - -----------...

My organization is in the position of having to support full Windows ACLs on CIFS shares. We've been successfully utilizing Samba 3.5.10-125 and vfs_acl_tdb to accomplish that. However, the size of the resulting /var/lib/samba/state/file_ntacls.tdb[.unique-extension] file(s) has introduced some new problems for me to solve. In our environment, it seems on average each stored ACL causes file_ntacls.tdb to grow by almost 1000 bytes. That's what I...

...ate mask = 0660 directory mask = 2770 force group = fts_data path = <PATH> guest ok = no public = no writeable = yes valid users = +GROUP1 +GROUP2 vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility = local7 full_audit:priority = NOTICE # Example share [SHARE_NAME] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> c...

Hello, Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs? I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or acl_tdb. Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)? Best regards /Adrian Berlin --

> Lets hold off with logs, do you know that if you remove everything > that should be in a share from the [global] part of your smb.conf, you > get left with just '[global]’. The share actually comes from an include file. I made it look like it’s part of the main config for simplicity. > It also doesn't help that everything > that is in [global] is also in the share. It’s

...Linux, and >> set new acls on the commandline of the cluster. BUT as soon as I >> try to set permissions via windows it fails with "the request is >> not supported" I use "vfs objects = acl_xattr". When I create a >> second share with "vfs objects = acl_tdb" ist works, but I think >> storing ACLS in a TDB-file is no option for large systems. >> >> Here my setup: Distribution: name it, I tried it. At the moment >> Debian 8 and Centos 7 Gluster-version: 7.6 from gluster.org >> Samba-version: SerNet Samba 4.3.1 >&g...

...s = eno1 lo:eno1_alias > > bind interfaces only = yes > > #; disable printer sharing > > load printers = no > > printing = bsd > > printcap name = /dev/null > > disable spoolss = yes > > #; fixes a robocopy bug with attribute setting > > vfs objects = acl_tdb > > > > include = /etc/samba/local_shares.conf > > > > 2. Example share from /etc/samba/local_shares.conf > > =================================================== > > > > [SHARE_NAME] > > access based share enum = yes > > browseable = yes > &g...

...les, using Windows or Linux, and set new acls on the commandline of > the cluster. BUT as soon as I try to set permissions via windows it > fails with "the request is not supported" I use "vfs objects = > acl_xattr". When I create a second share with "vfs objects = acl_tdb" > ist works, but I think storing ACLS in a TDB-file is no option for > large systems. > > Here my setup: > Distribution: name it, I tried it. At the moment Debian 8 and Centos 7 > Gluster-version: 7.6 from gluster.org > Samba-version: SerNet Samba 4.3.1 > > Here m...

...ry mask = 2770 > force group = fts_data > path = <PATH> > guest ok = no > public = no > writeable = yes > valid users = +GROUP1 +GROUP2 > vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb > full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S > full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite > full_audit:failure = none > full_audit:facility = local7 > full_audit:priority = NOTICE > > # Example share > [SHARE_NAME] > access based share enum = yes...

...listen on these interface > interfaces = eno1 lo:eno1_alias > bind interfaces only = yes > #; disable printer sharing > load printers = no > printing = bsd > printcap name = /dev/null > disable spoolss = yes > #; fixes a robocopy bug with attribute setting > vfs objects = acl_tdb > > include = /etc/samba/local_shares.conf > > 2. Example share from /etc/samba/local_shares.conf > =================================================== > > [SHARE_NAME] > access based share enum = yes > browseable = yes > comment = <COMMENT> > create mask =...