Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "acl_get_perm".
2002 Feb 19
3
ACL fully functional?
....17) and samba (2.2.3a) to support
ACL/EAs. It looks like it has gone well, but I get one message that
worries me, but I don't know if it should or not.
checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes
checking for ACL support... yes
Using posix ACLs
checking for acl_get_perm_np... no
As you can see, the last line is where my concern lies. Can anyone
shed some light on what is being done here?
Thanks alot,
Al Moote
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
This is a check for FreeBSD's acl_get_perm_np() function
(FreeBSD/TrustedBSD implement non-POSIX.1e functions with
a _np (non-portable) suffix). The Linux ACL library
includes an acl_get_perm() implementation so not having
this function should not be a concern.
...Juergen
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
This is a check for FreeBSD's acl_get_perm_np() function
(FreeBSD/TrustedBSD implement non-POSIX.1e functions with
a _np (non-portable) suffix). The Linux ACL library
includes an acl_get_perm() implementation so not having
this function should not be a concern.
...Juergen
2006 Oct 26
1
Rsync 2.6.9pre3 released
I've just released rsync 2.6.9pre3. This should be the last version
before the final 2.6.9 release, and I don't foresee any significant
changes between it and the final release.
Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks!
Here are direct links for the tar file and its signature:
2006 Oct 26
1
Rsync 2.6.9pre3 released
I've just released rsync 2.6.9pre3. This should be the last version
before the final 2.6.9 release, and I don't foresee any significant
changes between it and the final release.
Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks!
Here are direct links for the tar file and its signature: