search for: acknowleging

Greetings, I'm having some trouble with the realtime engines. When asterisk loads, everything looks fine, there don't seem to be any problems via notices or anything. Furthermore, cdr_odbc is working, and actively logging my failed call attempts to db through ODBC using the same DSN. unixODBC and the mysql drivers are installed from source. Here are the relevant parts of the config:

Hi Gene, (some text snipped throughout) > > issue #1: > > I can only get this working on 6.02-pre16 and before back to 6.01-pre2, > > but definitely not working for me on the latest precompiled 6.02 zip & tar.gz. > http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 although my current > branch needs just a little more work for the cross-subnet case. Thanks for that,

<dag at cray.com> writes: > Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: > >>> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are >>> a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time >>> for everyone. >> >> It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous >> with patch

> - I have to *remember* I submitted the patch (not hard, but it is a > cost). If you forgot, the chances are high that the patch was unimportant. I do my development on local git branches, so every time I do `git branch`, I'm reminded. There's really no overhead. > - I have to save that e-mail from llvm-commits so I can refer to it when > the inevitable ping is

If i use AMD() or the code below, now the problem is the fax machine/modem detection and answer machine detection get detected as the same. If i need to seperate the two how do i do that? For example, if i use AMD() to detect an answer machine by saying any greeting exceeding 2.5 seconds is a machine, how do i distinguish between a fax/modem and a long greeting? ---- dave cantera

I am having a bit of a problem getting AMD to work on a new server. On my regular office server it works like a charm. I am running Asterisk 1.4.13, Zaptel 1.4.5.1 on both machines. Both servers run CentOS 5 and I am using a SIP trunk to send out calls (the same one on both servers). Here is the output of a call on my office server: -- Attempting call on Local/0445540881644 at CC2 for

...e that is automatically put into the c:\windows\temp folder. It use the same method of toc/cab files however this happens automatically and when the app can't find the cab it then deletes them from C:\windows\temp. The workaround is to copy the toc and cab file out of the temp folder before acknowleging the error, then edit the toc and install as if it was a update. This is slightly more frustrating. If the application can find the file when <Location>file://z:\TomTom\HOME\Downloads\navcore_6.52.7690.go-rider-one.cab</Location> is used why doesn't; <Location>file:///C:/Do...

Here is some more stuff to add to the confusion about the "callprogress" option. I currently have my * system operating with a T100P talking to an ADTRAN TSU600 channel bank with 8 FXO ports connecting to the outside world and Grandstream SIP phones as handset extensions. At first I naively set "callprogress=yes" in zapata.conf. The results were typical of what many

Hi all, Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's? cheers, Christopher

When trying to dial out 982420173 our main number I get the engaged signal before I finish entering the phone number Any ideas ???? Regards Mick

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are >> a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time >> for everyone. > > It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous > with patch review. Most of us have a number of things that we can work >

Hello Tom, I am not sure if you can help with this but I am at my wits end. If you hit this site and do a force refresh (ctrl + F5) the site will time out and lose connections. Do the same on port 443 and it does not time out??? The web site I am reffering to is www.tituswill.com I think the only problem is port 80. Do you have any idea how to diagnose this I have sent a dump of just

Hello everyone, I am looking for a way to pass off a simple payment to paypal using our own interface. I understand that this requires making full use of Paypal''s API since we won''t be using their shopping cart or anything. I found the article by Pranav Bihari on his site and in the Wiki on using SOAP4R and the paypal WSDL file to interface with paypal web services, but I

Hey folks, the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009 due to the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in Windows XP without SP3). @Developers: There is still some space left to place your changes in the release notes. Karolin -- Samba http://www.samba.org SerNet http://www.sernet.de sambaXP http://www.sambaxp.org -------------- next part

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > When you say things like this it comes across as though you are > > implying there are two tiers to the community. Ie those that set the > > strategy and those that don't. > > This isn't true, I just ask you to consider the goals that have been set > already, because we have been working on

Hi, background: I've managed to get EFI32, EFI64 and 'BIOS' modes all booting & working from the same TFTP/DHCP server using the setup described in message #10 here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720589#10 I'm running this inside VMWare 9 - switching between x86 and x86_64 to check both EFI32 and EFI64, and then another non efi VM for bios. issue #1: I can

> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are > a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time > for everyone. It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous with patch review. Most of us have a number of things that we can work on, so letting a patch chill for a while on the list isn't a big deal

I'm not sure if this is a -users or a -dev question, since the answer probably comes down to something in the code. I'm running the latest CVS-STABLE, and am subscribed to PSTN service using IAX2 via Voiptalk in the UK. I've just been alerted by a customer that the sending of DTMF from my asterisk box to a remote PSTN user doesn't work, although it used to. To test it, I have

The latest version of the survival package has two important additions. In prior code the call coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ age + strata(inst), data=lung) could fail if a version of either Surv() or strata() existed elsewhere on the search path; the wrong function could be picked up. Second, a model with survival::strata(inst) in the formula would not do what users expect. These

Hi all, Can anyone show me pointers on how to get this implemented on a Linux box with tc rules? I also want to know, just how efficient is this Algorithm. AFAIK, inbound traffic control can''t really be achieved without losing bandwidth. In some of the howtos'' I''ve read, one guy had to limit his downspeed to 1/2 his bandwidth to actually control it. And he was saying