search for: acknowleg

...+ | Tables_in_voip | +------------------+ | cdr | | extensions_table | | sip_users | | voicemail_users | +------------------+ In voicemail_users I have an entry for 100101, and in extensions_table I have an extension 520, priority 1 to playback tt-monkeys. Asterisk fails to acknowlege the existence of either. sip_users is blank, and cdr holds the (working) CDR information. In /usr/local/etc/odbc.ini I have: [MySQL-asterisk]] Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing Driver = MySQL #Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock Server = 10.10.15.30 User...

...g /bootmgfw.efi... failed: No such file or directory" but on the tftpd side of things, and in packet capture, I can see that it requested, in this order: /bootmgfw.efi.c32, img, bss, bin, bs, 0 -> 'not found', and then finally /bootmgfw.efi to which the server replies "Option Acknowlegement, tsize\000=1604952\000, blksize\000=1408\000 and then the client says "Error Code, Code: Not defined, Message: No error, file close" If I rename bootmgfw.efi -> bootmgfw.0 and try again: "Too large for a boostrap (need LINUX instead of KERNEL?)" [note: found a typo - bo...

..., not strictly a timeliness issue. - I have to send a ping e-mail. - Now I have to look for responses to *two* e-mails. In short, e-mail is a very poor vehicle for managing this kind of process. I hope that the patch queue in testing helps alleviate the poor response time problem. Even just an acknowlegement, "hey I got your patch but it will be a few days before I can review it", would help a lot. -David

...thread. Maybe this is the root cause of your vehement dissatisfaction with the current email-based system? > In short, e-mail is a very poor vehicle for managing this kind of > process. I hope that the patch queue in testing helps alleviate the > poor response time problem. Even just an acknowlegement, "hey I got > your patch but it will be a few days before I can review it", would help > a lot. Have you considered the amount of quality code that gets produced with the current process? What kind of improvements can we expect from such a system? Are there advantages that ema...

...=> 13,n,PlayBack(lax/to-hear-msg-press-1) > exten => 13,n,Read(CALL_ACK,beep,1,,,3) > exten => 13,n,NoOp(CALL_ACK is >${CALL_ACK}<) > exten => 13,n,GotoIf([${CALL_ACK} = ""]?nak13) > exten => 13,n(ack13),NoOp( Ack ) > exten => 13,n,NoOp( log the ACK acknowlegement here calling the AGI script) > ;exten => 13,n,AGI(lax/track-laxcalls.sh,${EXTEN},${CALL_ACK}) > exten => 13,n,GotoIf([${CALL_ACK} = ""]?play13) > exten => 13,n(nak13),NoOp( Nak ) > exten => 13,n,NoOp( log the NAK acknowlegement here calling the AGI script) &gt...

I am having a bit of a problem getting AMD to work on a new server. On my regular office server it works like a charm. I am running Asterisk 1.4.13, Zaptel 1.4.5.1 on both machines. Both servers run CentOS 5 and I am using a SIP trunk to send out calls (the same one on both servers). Here is the output of a call on my office server: -- Attempting call on Local/0445540881644 at CC2 for

...e that is automatically put into the c:\windows\temp folder. It use the same method of toc/cab files however this happens automatically and when the app can't find the cab it then deletes them from C:\windows\temp. The workaround is to copy the toc and cab file out of the temp folder before acknowleging the error, then edit the toc and install as if it was a update. This is slightly more frustrating. If the application can find the file when <Location>file://z:\TomTom\HOME\Downloads\navcore_6.52.7690.go-rider-one.cab</Location> is used why doesn't; <Location>file:///C:...

...e line is hung up). In other words, either the ADTRAN had signalled that ringing had stopped, or * was listening and noticed that ringing had stopped. However, even though the remote phone is picked up, I still hear (the locally generated) ringback on the SIP phone, indicating that * had not acknowleged the remote phone having been picked up, even though it apparently knows - it has after all stopped repeatedly displaying the "ringing" notification. The questions are these: 1) If callprogress is in fact detecting ringing, and then the cessation of ringing through the ADTRAN, then...

Hi all, Any comments as to Centos/RHEL 5.3's openjdk implementation versus Sun's? cheers, Christopher

When trying to dial out 982420173 our main number I get the engaged signal before I finish entering the phone number Any ideas ???? Regards Mick

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are >> a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time >> for everyone. > > It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous > with patch review. Most of us have a number of things that we can work >

Hello Tom, I am not sure if you can help with this but I am at my wits end. If you hit this site and do a force refresh (ctrl + F5) the site will time out and lose connections. Do the same on port 443 and it does not time out??? The web site I am reffering to is www.tituswill.com I think the only problem is port 80. Do you have any idea how to diagnose this I have sent a dump of just

Hello everyone, I am looking for a way to pass off a simple payment to paypal using our own interface. I understand that this requires making full use of Paypal''s API since we won''t be using their shopping cart or anything. I found the article by Pranav Bihari on his site and in the Wiki on using SOAP4R and the paypal WSDL file to interface with paypal web services, but I

Hey folks, the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009 due to the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in Windows XP without SP3). @Developers: There is still some space left to place your changes in the release notes. Karolin -- Samba http://www.samba.org SerNet http://www.sernet.de sambaXP http://www.sambaxp.org -------------- next part

Hi, background: I've managed to get EFI32, EFI64 and 'BIOS' modes all booting & working from the same TFTP/DHCP server using the setup described in message #10 here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720589#10 I'm running this inside VMWare 9 - switching between x86 and x86_64 to check both EFI32 and EFI64, and then another non efi VM for bios. issue #1: I can

> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are > a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time > for everyone. It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous with patch review. Most of us have a number of things that we can work on, so letting a patch chill for a while on the list isn't a big deal

I'm not sure if this is a -users or a -dev question, since the answer probably comes down to something in the code. I'm running the latest CVS-STABLE, and am subscribed to PSTN service using IAX2 via Voiptalk in the UK. I've just been alerted by a customer that the sending of DTMF from my asterisk box to a remote PSTN user doesn't work, although it used to. To test it, I have

Hi all, Can anyone show me pointers on how to get this implemented on a Linux box with tc rules? I also want to know, just how efficient is this Algorithm. AFAIK, inbound traffic control can''t really be achieved without losing bandwidth. In some of the howtos'' I''ve read, one guy had to limit his downspeed to 1/2 his bandwidth to actually control it. And he was saying

...the values found in the sample config file. Wine appears to be working. I can play MSHEARTS.EXE and GM does come up most of the way. As a mundane user I cd to GM's home directory and issue the command $ wine GrooveMech.exe After a bit of a wait, GM's main window comes up along with the acknowlegement that I paid my shareware fee. I now have the choice of recording a file or processing an existing file. If I choose to record, then I must specify the file to capture with. A file browser is presented and all appears to work. I do get the fixme: error message, but it doesn't appeat to...

>Simply stated, SRP is a strong password authentication protocol that >resists passive/active network attack, and when used in conjunction with >OpenSSH, solves the "unknown host key" problem without requiring host >key fingerprint verification or PKI deployment (e.g. X.509 certs). Put >another way, is there any good reason *not* to fold these patches into >OpenSSH