search for: acknowledges

Hi there. Regarding currently known problem as stated on http://syslinux.zytor.com/pxe.php: we should probably call the UDP receive function in the keyboard entry loop, so that we answer ARP requests. Here's another illustration of the problem, description of related pxelinux problem and workaround for both problems. Configuration: dhcp/tftp server -- 213.180.194.116 (00:1B:78:05:84:6C)

...-007f,1 answered, waiting for '#' to acknowledge == Spawn extension (sip, 517, 1) exited non-zero on 'Local/517@sip-007f,2' -- SIP/517-39f4 acknowledged -- Agent/4000 answered SIP/518-6071 However, when I dial an Agent channel in version 1.0.9, the Agent on the other side acknowledges the call (by pressing #), a transfer happens rather than an acknowledgement. Here's what shows up in the CLI: Executing SetCIDName("SIP/316-21f2", "Fr 316 To Agent1415") in new stack -- Executing Dial("SIP/316-21f2", "Agent/1415|30|t") in new stack...

Hi, I have a user that is experiencing problems pxe booting several identical servers. pxelinux.0 is from syslinux 3.63 and the TFTP server is 0.42 running on CentOS 5.2. After loading pxelinux.0, the client will then start transferring vmlinuz and initrd.img via tftp. More than half the time, the transfer will get stuck and then eventually print a timeout message. I ran tcpdump and I can see

Any ideas? Sangoma support is closed for the evening. I have the latest Sangoma drivers and Asterisk 1.4 everything installed. When I fire up asterisk, I keep getting "Primary D-Channel on span 1 up" repeated over and over. The B channels never come up. There are no errors in any of the logs, zttool, or the wanpipe tools. Intense pri debug output: < Unnumbered frame: < SAPI:

Hello. I have a problem with the native Android SIP client, not acknowledging the call. Sent a message to the list for some weeks ago containing a sip debug log, but it only got stuck in moderation queue due to too large size (and it said I would get a message if moderators rejected it, but did not get message and I don't think it got posted to list either) This ONLY happens when

I have a Toshiba PBX connected via a QSIG PRI to Asterisk. I can make calls from the Toshiba to Asterisk and internal calls from Asterisk to the Toshiba. What I can't do is make an call with an outside destination from Asterisk to the Toshiba. The Toshiba is looking for 9 to grab an outside line then it expects to see the 10 digits. In the FreePBX dial plan I use 9|. which sends 9 plus the 10

Gene and co, Now my pxelinux efi 64 boot is properly loading syslinux.efi (via TFTP) It then issues a TFTP file request for efi.x64/pxelinux.cfg/ldlinux.e64. (All my efi x64 content is under efi.x64/pxelinux.cfg). However, I see that it fails to properly negotiate the TFTP options with my TFTP server. so it never transfers ldlinux.e64 over. In its file request packet, it asks for these TFTP

Hi, I have the following happen to me after the restart of one of my servers: out of my 3 PRIs (all configured with the same technical settings), the last one isn't coming back. It's underutilized (chances it didn't get a call since my reboot), if it makes a difference . The PRI goes from provisioned to unprovisioned, and I get this regularly: [Jun 22 09:03:48]

Hi Guys, Running the following with a Sangoma A101D PRI card: *Asterisk 1.4.21.2* *LibPRI version: 1.4.10* No inbound or outbound calls can be made. In fact Asterisk CLI doesn't show any activity. Problem goes away on restart of the system or maybe asterisk. I see post about upgrading Libpri to 1.4.10.2 and then I see posts that even that didn't work. Anyone can weigh in this please?

Dear people on the Syslinux Mailinglist, Are there any known problems with the performance of TFTP in (U)EFI environments in general or maybe just on VMWare? Right now I'm running tests on two virtual environments using either VMWare Workstation 11.1.0 on a Fedora 21 system or VMWare Player 7.1.0 on an Ubuntu 14.10 system. Both virtual systems support PXE booting in UEFI mode. Both systems

R-devel, I've received permission from a third party to incorporate some of their data in a data set in my 'portfolio' package. I'd like to include an acknowledgment of the third party, and perhaps a "used with permission" somewhere in the package documentation. Where's the best spot in the package docs for such an acknowledgment? Is there a place preferable to the

On Jun 17, 2015 11:27 AM, "Oscar Roozen via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Dear people on the Syslinux Mailinglist, > > Are there any known problems with the performance of TFTP in (U)EFI > environments in general or maybe just on VMWare? I don't believe so. I use Workstation 10.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 for the moment. > Right now I'm running

On restore, virtio pci does the following: + set features + init vqs etc - device can be used at this point! + set ACKNOWLEDGE,DRIVER and DRIVER_OK status bits This is in violation of the virtio spec, which requires the following order: - ACKNOWLEDGE - DRIVER - init vqs - DRIVER_OK Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin

On restore, virtio pci does the following: + set features + init vqs etc - device can be used at this point! + set ACKNOWLEDGE,DRIVER and DRIVER_OK status bits This is in violation of the virtio spec, which requires the following order: - ACKNOWLEDGE - DRIVER - init vqs - DRIVER_OK Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin

Hi, i'm trying to get my VIA Epia with VIA Rhine ethernet device to boot PXELinux. I have done this before, but now i can't get it to work. The machine loads pxelinux.0, i see some messages. But it fails just after trying reading the first config file (the one with the mac address). It kinda says this (transcribed): CLIENT IP: 192.168.1.23 MASK: 255.255.255.0 DHCP IP: 192.168.1.93

Hello, A host of mine which acts as a gateway for a cluster also acts as a dhcp and tftp server for the cluster nodes. Recently, for reasons that are not really important we changed the interfaces so that eth0 is conencted to our production network and the eth1 network is connected to the cluster's internal network. It was the opposite before. Normally, we want most of the services running on

Hi, Most companies we work with, have 'designated' crisis management teams. These vary from the insignificant crisis', through to life-threatening crisis'. There is always an assigned emergency services contact, whose job it is in an emergency, to maintain communication with the emergency services. One of our corporate functions is crisis management - so we have to consider

Ok Guys, I've done a tonne of hunting around on this problem, but can't find much help. I'm running: asterisk 1.4.19.1 libpri 1.4.3 and zaptel 1.4.9.2 which I believe has been modified by RedFone to add the ztd-ethmf module. My interface is a RedFone foneBridge2 4 Span; and I'm connecting to a BT E1 PRI / ISDN30e with 15 lines on span 1, and a legacy Panasonic PBX on span 4. Upon

I keep getting repeated copies of ``R-help post acknowledgements'' in respect of a couple of postings that I made to the list this morning (my time). I only posted each posting *once*. I hope that others are not getting repeated copies of my postings .... I mean I *know* my postings are so wonderful they merit re-reading, but one does not need another copy in order to re-read! :-)

Hi guys, Fosdem 2019 is slowly approaching and so they opened the registration form for participants and also stands requests. So it's now done for CentOS and let's see how that goes -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Acknowledging your stand request (CentOS) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:33:10 +0200 (CEST) From: stands at fosdem.org To: arrfab at centos.org CC: stands at