search for: acking

Hi, In our company we are currently running a Samba server and Windows XP clients. At the moment we are having problems with mapping Samba shares in Windows. Shares are being mapped through a windows startup script, which executes net use (with the option persistent:no) command. For most users this works most of the time, nevertheless it often fails, the exect reason for this isn't clear

Hi, I am not able to access the local CIFS share using samba on unix machine. It is returning with Access Denied. Please see the attachment for more details. Thanks, Dhyan -------------- next part -------------- 03:09:50.311663 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > 10.213.132.83.64001: P 339078270:339078322(52) ack 1209710857 win 9648 03:09:50.311694 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Shane <arlenslambert at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arlenslambert at gmail.com Attachment #134 is|0 |1 patch|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 Summary: 2.6 kernel failing in NAT with significant outbound traffic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:

Hi, I''m using drbfire to send a "DRbUndumped" ActiveRecord object from the server to the client, through an ADSL line of 4Mbits/s download, and 600Kbits/s upload. I was afraid there would be too many round-trips between the client and the server, and unfortunately this is true: Server code: ------------ #!/usr/local/bin/ruby require ''rubygems'' require

For quite awhile I've noticed that smbd uses 10-15% of my CPU (Pentium 4) when nothing visible is going on. I have a couple of laptops on my home network, and some experiments showing that powering on the Vista laptop (other is OSX) is sufficient to raise useage from 0 to 10-15%. The screen is locked, although 2 user accounts are logged in. Wireshark seems to show a lot of chatter,

---------------------------------------------------- Server : Athlon 64 3000+ ; 512MB Ram ; lots of disks ; nforce3 chipset ; integrated nvidia gigabit NIC. Gentoo 2.6.15 linux 64-bits ; Samba 3.0.14a-r2 ---------------------------------------------------- Clients : Laptop with Centrino Pentium-M, 100 Mbps NIC, running Windows XP Family Desktop with Athlon 64 3200+ ; 1G DDR Dual Channel

Excuse me in advance for my poor english I have noted a small bug on OpenSSH 3.5p1. When user root is not permitted to log in a system (PermitRoot no) and a correct password is submitted for it to server, a RST packet is issued from server to client: [root at xxx root]# ssh victim root at victim's password: Permission denied, please try again. root at victim's password: Permission

On 18.4.2013 ?. 22:24 ?., Arnaud Quette wrote: > > 2013/4/18 Pladi Computers Ltd. <pladi at lovechnet.com > <mailto:pladi at lovechnet.com>> > > UPS: > http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS > > I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one > is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the

I trying to figure out why copying from a Samba drive to Windows XP is slower than an FTP transfer beween the same two machines. To copy the 110 MB file from Samba takes 400 seconds, and to transfer the same file by FTP takes 41 seconds. From using ethereal, and comparing a fast smb copy to a slow smb copy, I can see that the slow copy has a _lot_ more tcp traffic for a SMB single read

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627 Summary: NATed TCP-connections fail arbitrarily Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

UPS: http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the second one is running Debian 6.0 x64. Both of them are updated. I tried using different serial cable but the result is the same. The connection to the ups using Windows 7 and Winpower is working fine on

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

I've been seeing this kind of crap now for some time, and only in the past couple of weeks did I realize I was using the Plus Kernel instead of the normal stock kernel. Could this have something to do with it? Messages also appear mentioning something about a PowerNow K-8, which I thought was something you'd see from an AMD processor, not a quad core intel 64 bit box. Any insight

Hi list, I am encountering a problem in connecting a Windows 2003 to a Samba 3.0.21b server. The Samba server is configured to have a security = share option, so that no password is needed. I can connect to the server by typing "net use z: \\192.168.51.1\data", and it is successful. However, if I try to do "dir z:", no file found! Same behaviour are found in Windows

Hi, A number of students are unable to connect to our print server from their Windows 10 client laptop without entering a user/pass. More precisely: If you try to connect manually to \\IP it says "Username or password incorrect" and prompts to enter a username/password. Despite the server setting to map all users to guest (see further down). I did a packet dump and the client pc

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Thanks! > > Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction > printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. > >

to my knowlidge, konica = xerox. and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now. i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s. i can check this monday. Greetz, Louis > Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: >> Mandi!

Hi, I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC. (samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid" so we have identical ids across the servers.) I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option. However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in,

The waiting time is about 50s on my CentOS box now. "yum remove openssh* "and "yum install openssh*" can't make it right. "mv ~/.ssh{,.bak}" not works either. Here comes my tcpdump log, I am not an expert on SSH, Can anyone here get me out of this? Thanks Ryan [root at centos5u2 ~]# tcpdump -s 1520 -nn port 22 tcpdump: WARNING: peth0: no IPv4 address assigned