search for: ackermans

> For example: > $ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? The invocation of $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe does not produce native assebler output as one might expect. -- Valery

Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>For example: >>$ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > > BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy > of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? > > The invocation of > > $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.

Hi , I am using the plot function for some data , and the plot is coming back pure black , with scales on the side . Regards Malcolm [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi devels, there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: 1. this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain examples on optimization step. 2. If i am not wrong there is no tool, which integrates all steps: llvmgcc->opt->llc into something like llcc (and

On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: > > 1. > this document: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html > is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section > > An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain > > examples on optimization step. That's an

Hi all i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in comparison to GCC) on ackerman test on my AthlonXP. But here:

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and > ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. > > 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM > team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout > and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in >

I thought I had things figured out, but guess not. I have multi-user Quickbooks databases that functioned fine on a Novell server but are behaving badly on a Samba share. I have created a separate share for the Quickbook databases, users are running Win XP Pro, latest patches, and the Quickbooks application installed on the desktop. It is a multiuser version. Server is RedHat ES 3, Samba

> This test seems PARTICULARLY noisy for some reason. Take a look at this: > [...] > ... the native version swings from 3.13-3.34s and the llc-ls version > swings from 3.83-4.0s. The C backend is also noisy, swinging from > 3.98-4.58s. FWIW, these tests are on a Intel P4 Xeon 3.06Ghz machine with > HT enabled. In any case, it appears that we're slower than GCC on this one.

Hi, I have a plot that is essentially the same as that in Figure 5.6 of "Lattice - Multivariate Data Visualization with R". The key difference is that I would like to add a title to top of the grey color spectrum legend, but have thus far been unsuccessful. I've tried a variety of options, but to no avail. I'm new to R, and admittedly I don't understand the

Hello, I'm new to the list and pretty much a newbie to linux and samba. I'm quick learner though. I have been losing my samba share upon ocasion recently, below is a portion of the syslog from the time period that I think is when the share goes down. A reboot of the server or a restart of the smbd fixes the problem (....until it happens again) I don't know what SIGUP is or why

Hello, Is tail call optimization performed if the ret instruction does not actually follow the tail call? Not according to the documentation, but in examples it seems to work. For example, consider the following definition of Ackerman's function in ML (it has two tail calls): let rec ack x y = if x <= 0 then y + 1 else if y <= 0 then ack (x - 1) 1 else ack (x - 1) (ack x (y -

I am new at Samba. I just about have it working. From my windows XP client, I can access the workgroup and then see the server. When I click on server to access network folders, the login pops up. I put in the username and password (both of which are already in Samba). The login window refreshes and I get in the login screen: XXX/username, with XXX being the name of my local Windows XP

The smb service is not starting automatically. I can type service smb start at the prompt and it loads, and I can then connect, but its not loading automatically as it used to. Can someone point me in the right direction as what file I need to change to make it load at startup. Thanks! Liz

I am running Samba 3 on RedHat Enterprise ES rel 3 on an Intel box. I read a man page about vfstest, but I am not able to find any such file on my system. Can someone direct me to where I might find this file? Thanks. Liz

> I did not mean that one must change the Fibonacci function code, but > that there are other way to express it, and that some of these > expression are more suitable for parallelization. The "continuation > passing style" is just a possibility among many others. well, what to do with this example then? :) > The problem I see is that the Fibonacci function you

Hi Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>To me this appears more as an algorithmic design issue, this function >>could be rewritten in "continuation passing style", and each >>continuation could be distributed by a load-balancing strategy to the >>computers sharing CPU resources. Using mechanisms such as "futures" (as >>in Mozart) allows to do

Hi, I'm new to R and new to this forum. I'm struggling with trying to extract certain rows of data from my data.frame. The data.frame has eleven columns. Among those columns are "FISH_ID" and "DATE_TIME". FISH_ID is a factor. For each of my 21 unique FISH_IDs (levels) I have a few to a few thousand rows, each row with a unique DATE_TIME value. I would like to obtain,

Hi there, Can somebody please explain to me why Samba 3 requires 'oplocks = no' on shares for programs like Quickbooks to operate properly with multiple users, where Samba 2 didn't? Without this option, Quickbooks will complain about file corruption when a second user tries to open a file. This option, however, makes the particular share that the option is present in _very_ slow

I know this question has been asked several times, and I appoligize for this being as long as it is, but I'm hoping someone may have it figured out by now. Here is the situation: I can mount a share from my Windows XP machine (RA), and from another Windows Server 2003 machine (MAAT). But not from my Windows Server 2003 domain controller (BASTET). I am running Samba 3.0.0 (standard RPM