search for: acke

Hi, In our company we are currently running a Samba server and Windows XP clients. At the moment we are having problems with mapping Samba shares in Windows. Shares are being mapped through a windows startup script, which executes net use (with the option persistent:no) command. For most users this works most of the time, nevertheless it often fails, the exect reason for this isn't clear

...:09:57.949101 IP 10.213.132.83.63941 > dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh: P 1300:1352(52) ack 1781 win 64032 03:09:57.982064 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > 10.213.132.83.63941: . ack 1352 win 10720 03:09:58.229188 IP script-37.odc.reconnex.net.netbios-ns > 172.20.242.255.netbios-ns: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST 03:09:58.292339 IP 172.20.241.3.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1 03:09:58.292578 IP 172.20.242.3.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1 03:09:58.314444 IP 172.20.241.2.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1 03:09:58.314674 IP 172.20.242.2.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv...

...|1 patch| | --- Comment #20 from Shane <arlenslambert at gmail.com> --- Comment on attachment 134 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=134 tcpdump of communication during which conntrack seems to "forget" packets 14:39:54.925957 IP Y.Y.Y.Y.1818 > X.X.X.X.2000: S 849153605:849153605(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> 14:39:57.943185 IP Y.Y.Y.Y.1818 > X.X.X.X.2000: S 849153605:849153605(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> 14:39:58.241750 IP X.X.X.X.2000 > Y.Y.Y.Y.1818: S 3217892...

...e scenario: client1 (internal IP: 172.30.32.58) linux1 (172.30.32.55, seen as 200.79.245.55 on the Internet due to an upstream NAT) internetserver1 (80.140.102.163) please note that all external IPs have been altered to protect the innocent/guilty. If linux1 performs MASQUERADING or SNAT or any packets passing through it TO/FROM the internet, the following situation is observed: 1) data being RETREIVED from the Internet works as expected. 100+mb of data has been tested. 2) data being PUSHED to the Internet will fail after a variable (but typically small) amount of data has been sent. The co...

Hi, I''m using drbfire to send a "DRbUndumped" ActiveRecord object from the server to the client, through an ADSL line of 4Mbits/s download, and 600Kbits/s upload. I was afraid there would be too many round-trips between the client and the server, and unfortunately this is true: Server code: ------------ #!/usr/local/bin/ruby require ''rubygems'' require

...wins support = yes include = /etc/samba/dhcp.conf dns proxy = no interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 ethfast bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 syslog = 0 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d encrypt passwords = true passdb backend = tdbsam obey pam restrictions = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . printing = cups printcap name = cups socket options = TCP_NODELAY [homes] comment = Home...

---------------------------------------------------- Server : Athlon 64 3000+ ; 512MB Ram ; lots of disks ; nforce3 chipset ; integrated nvidia gigabit NIC. Gentoo 2.6.15 linux 64-bits ; Samba 3.0.14a-r2 ---------------------------------------------------- Clients : Laptop with Centrino Pentium-M, 100 Mbps NIC, running Windows XP Family Desktop with Athlon 64 3200+ ; 1G DDR Dual Channel

Excuse me in advance for my poor english I have noted a small bug on OpenSSH 3.5p1. When user root is not permitted to log in a system (PermitRoot no) and a correct password is submitted for it to server, a RST packet is issued from server to client: [root at xxx root]# ssh victim root at victim's password: Permission denied, please try again. root at victim's password: Permission denied, please try again. ......... root at victim's password: Read from remote host 10.12.7.110: Connection reset by...

On 18.4.2013 ?. 22:24 ?., Arnaud Quette wrote: > > 2013/4/18 Pladi Computers Ltd. <pladi at lovechnet.com > <mailto:pladi at lovechnet.com>> > > UPS: > http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS > > I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one > is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the

...MB Read Request (115 bytes) 960 SMB Read Response (1514 bytes) 961 TCP [Continuation to #961] netbios-ssn > 1043 ACK (1514 bytes) 962 TCP [Continuation to #962] netbios-ssn > 1043 PSA, ACK (1318 bytes) 963 TCP 1043 > netbios-ssn ACK (963 bytes) The slow copy (from XP) has two similar SMB packets ("Read AndX Request" instead of "Read Request"), but from there on the sequence differs, with many more TCP continuation packets and one SMB [TCP Retransmission]. I have attached a section of the ethereal log for the slow copy. It includes all packets between one "R...

...Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: xuan--2009--bugzilla.netfilter.org at baldauf.org It looks like incoming TCP packets are not always matched against a conntrack rule. The result is that the NATing linux box sends TCP-reset packets upon receiving an incoming TCP packet which should be NATed, which in turn kills the connection. Consider following setup: client has IP address 192.168.0.7/24 router1 has IP address...

UPS: http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ESeriesUPS/DXUPS/index.htm?wtredirect=www.eaton.com/DXUPS I have the same problem on two different computers. The first one is running Ubuntu 12.10 i386 , the second one is running Debian 6.0 x64. Both of them are updated. I tried using different serial cable but the result is the same. The connection to the ups using Windows 7 and Winpower is working fine on

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

I've been seeing this kind of crap now for some time, and only in the past couple of weeks did I realize I was using the Plus Kernel instead of the normal stock kernel. Could this have something to do with it? Messages also appear mentioning something about a PowerNow K-8, which I thought was something you'd see from an AMD processor, not a quad core intel 64 bit box. Any insight

Hi list, I am encountering a problem in connecting a Windows 2003 to a Samba 3.0.21b server. The Samba server is configured to have a security = share option, so that no password is needed. I can connect to the server by typing "net use z: \\192.168.51.1\data", and it is successful. However, if I try to do "dir z:", no file found! Same behaviour are found in Windows

...rom their Windows 10 client laptop without entering a user/pass. More precisely: If you try to connect manually to \\IP it says "Username or password incorrect" and prompts to enter a username/password. Despite the server setting to map all users to guest (see further down). I did a packet dump and the client pc asks NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE, server replies with an NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE and then the client pc simply hangs up (TCP RST). Now the (more) interesting bit: all this only happens when you use a "microsoft account", not if you use a local account. With a local account on...

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Thanks! > > Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction > printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. > >

to my knowlidge, konica = xerox. and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now. i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s. i can check this monday. Greetz, Louis > Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: >> Mandi!

Hi, I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC. (samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid" so we have identical ids across the servers.) I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option. However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in, then I get a mount error: "mount.nfs4: Permission denied" and rpc.gssd reports: "Failed to obtain mac...

...p,nop,timestamp 5130722 20402168> 18:55:17.155860 IP 192.168.7.252.22 > 192.168.7.24.52315: P 2413:2477(64) ack 1781 win 90 <nop,nop,timestamp 20402168 5130722> 18:55:17.155891 IP 192.168.7.24.52315 > 192.168.7.252.22: . ack 2477 win 79 <nop,nop,timestamp 5130722 20402168> 50 packets captured 100 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel [root at centos5u2 ~]# [root at centos5u2 ~]# -- FIXME if it is wrong.