search for: ack'ed

Folks, I'm having asterisk connect to another device via an E1 PRI. However, using "pri intense debug span 1" I'm seeing asterisk ONLY sending SABME packets. No packets are received. The other end is saying ISDN layer 2 is okay. Can this imply RX-errors where the other device is ack'ing the SABME's (and hence considers layer 2 established), while asterisk isn't receiving anything in return? Ignoring this (assuming for some wacko rea...

fellows, Are you all ready for -pre2 release? Charles already ack'ed, and Arjen already bumped the release number ;-) make distcheck runs fine, so does the buildbot... Anything more to add or test? Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstool...

.... > I've also rebased on master, but will need another round (following the 2 > branches pushed below) > I'm still lagging behind the HW tests, so if you can, let's move on... > otherwise, I'll do, but not today. > I'll check whenever possible, but Igor's feedback seems good to me, until > proven the opposite. > > > Arno, > > I saw your commit, but I did not realize it wasn't merged. I think Igor > has done sufficient testing, so do you want to merge it? > > Beside from the known list of tickets for 2.7.3, I had some late addit...

...ITE_THROUGH) and writes a timestamp to this file every 10 seconds. After some time, the file access fails (typically with the error ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED). Observation on network (using Ethereal) --------------------------------------- At 14:07:53 a successful write is performed. This is correctly acked by the samba server both on TCP and samba level. The ack occurs immediately. At 14:08:03 (10 secs later) next write is requested by client. This samba request is ack'ed immediately on TCP level (by server), but no samba acknowledge is received. At 14:08:41 Client sends an SMB Echo Req...

...well. > > Most certainly. Please give me a bit to follow up on this, as the next > couple of days are going to be hellishly busy.. > > > The TC meets on a bi-weekly basis, we should be able to ratify > > this quickly. > > > > Aside from that, please consider ACK'ing the vhost specific changes so > these can make it into v3.15-rc1 code. > > --nab > Hmm but what if the TC wants to change the interface somewhat? I guess we'll still be able to fix it after the merge window - (or worst case, revert the change) is this what you are suggest...

...well. > > Most certainly. Please give me a bit to follow up on this, as the next > couple of days are going to be hellishly busy.. > > > The TC meets on a bi-weekly basis, we should be able to ratify > > this quickly. > > > > Aside from that, please consider ACK'ing the vhost specific changes so > these can make it into v3.15-rc1 code. > > --nab > Hmm but what if the TC wants to change the interface somewhat? I guess we'll still be able to fix it after the merge window - (or worst case, revert the change) is this what you are suggest...

On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1) > > It changes virtscsi_add_cmd() to attach outgoing / incoming > protection SGLs preceeding the data payload, and is

On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1) > > It changes virtscsi_add_cmd() to attach outgoing / incoming > protection SGLs preceeding the data payload, and is

Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on 01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been no action other than it being acknowledged. I've also searched upstream with RHEL and FC and I cannot seem to find a bug report there though complaints of the problem can be found through searching the web. I do see the manual fix for it and will be testing that shortly. I am, however, dealing with a fairly rigid internal le...

...Apr 8, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote: > - #190: upsd: NSS SSL only working in debug mode => NEED TESTING before merging > Emilien has made a fix and PR (#199: Initialize SSL after deamonize and downgrade to user.) > The user (Melkor Lord) has ack'ed the fix. > The fix is indeed trivial but I want to ensure that there is no regression for OpenSSL now (though theoretically, there shouldn't be). > Testing welcome, while waiting to discuss with Emilien to see if he did some non-reg testing too. > Thanks a lot to Emilien for his...

...pplication socket. I have compared the behaviour of two X11 applications 1. xterm 2. wish (tcl/tk application) Let's start with xterm. Now when xterm appication wants to terminate the connection, it starts with sending "Fin" to the pseudo X11 socket. Now although this Fin get's ack'd but I don't think that the sshd polls this socket for the eof (end of conection request from the X11 client application). Even after receiving a Fin and ack'ing it, it sends data with ack to the X11 application socket which is expecting a Fin. On receiving this ack, it responds by sen...

...are never requested from the ftp server. The /var/log/message log contains: "Nov 23 07:11:05 phoenix vsftpd: warning: can't get client address: Bad file descriptor". That's really helpful.) The sniffer trace indicates a reliable ftp connection as the transfer involves three tcp packets followed by the phone ACK'ing those packets throughout the ftp download. (Eg, had the path been unreliable in any form, the tcp packet backoff mechanism would have dropped to one/two packets followed by an ACK.) Anyone seen such an issue? Maybe a bad phone? Anything else I should be look...

...ce, but a prose > description would do as well. Most certainly. Please give me a bit to follow up on this, as the next couple of days are going to be hellishly busy.. > The TC meets on a bi-weekly basis, we should be able to ratify > this quickly. > Aside from that, please consider ACK'ing the vhost specific changes so these can make it into v3.15-rc1 code. --nab

...lease give me a bit to follow up on this, as the next > > couple of days are going to be hellishly busy.. > > > > > The TC meets on a bi-weekly basis, we should be able to ratify > > > this quickly. > > > > > > > Aside from that, please consider ACK'ing the vhost specific changes so > > these can make it into v3.15-rc1 code. > > > > --nab > > > > Hmm but what if the TC wants to change the interface somewhat? I don't have a objection to changing the interface post-merge. > I guess we'll still be...

Signed-off-by: Loiseleur Michel <mloiseleur at linagora.com> --- app/models/smart_pool.rb | 10 ++++------ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/models/smart_pool.rb b/app/models/smart_pool.rb index 1f718a8..9afc354 100644 --- a/app/models/smart_pool.rb +++ b/app/models/smart_pool.rb @@ -62,18 +62,16 @@ class SmartPool < Pool if nested_pools

Hi Hal, Thanks for your comments! I'm inlining my responses below. Jingyue On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Jingyue, > > I can't speak for the NVPTX backend, but I think this looks useful as an > (optional) target-independent pass. A few thoughts: > > - Running GVN tends to be pretty expensive; have you tried EarlyCSE > instead? (When I was working on the BB vectorizer I was first using GVN for > cleanup afterward, someone suggested...

...usbmisc", I can possibly check to split > > in 2 commits (1 for the comments, and 1 for the content update). > > would that suits you that way? > > Sure. > please find attached the first patch, addressing the added devices. I'll send the comments update patch once you ack'ed my previous message. cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr -------------- next part -------------- A...

...NK10 | @@ -274,6 +275,7 @@ static int nv50_display_disable(struct drm_device *dev) BEGIN_RING(&dev_priv->evo.chan, 0, NV50_UPDATE_DISPLAY, 1); OUT_RING (&dev_priv->evo.chan, 0); FIRE_RING (&dev_priv->evo.chan); + RING_WAIT (&dev_priv->evo.chan); /* Almost like ack'ing a vblank interrupt, maybe in the spirit of * cleaning up? -- 1.6.3.3

...> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > > On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > >> > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same > name, > >> > nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an > already > >> > existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, > but keeps > >> > the initial name as...

...t 9:44 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote: > > - #190: upsd: NSS SSL only working in debug mode => NEED TESTING before > merging > Emilien has made a fix and PR (#199: Initialize SSL after deamonize and > downgrade to user.) > The user (Melkor Lord) has ack'ed the fix. > The fix is indeed trivial but I want to ensure that there is no regression > for OpenSSL now (though theoretically, there shouldn't be). > Testing welcome, while waiting to discuss with Emilien to see if he did > some non-reg testing too. > Thanks a lot to Emili...