search for: achitecture

Hello Has any one installed Cricket on Cenos ? it seems there is a patch that should apply on Format.pm to specify Achitecture, but I can not find it . Thanks

...4K. Since each express device is behind such a port, this means at most 15 such devices can use IO ports in a system. That's why to make a pci express virtio device, we must allow MMIO and/or some other communication mechanism as the spec requires. That's on x86. Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > claiming spec compliance. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Why do you bring this up? No one advocates any ABI breakage, I only suggest extensions. > > &gt...

...4K. Since each express device is behind such a port, this means at most 15 such devices can use IO ports in a system. That's why to make a pci express virtio device, we must allow MMIO and/or some other communication mechanism as the spec requires. That's on x86. Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > claiming spec compliance. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Why do you bring this up? No one advocates any ABI breakage, I only suggest extensions. > > &gt...

...It's not a device issue. Anyway, let's put express aside. It's easy to create non-working setups with pci, today: - create 16 pci bridges - put one virtio device behind each boom Try it. I want to fix that. > > That's on x86. > > > > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > > > >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > >> claiming spec compliance. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Anthony Liguori > > > > Why do you bring this...

...It's not a device issue. Anyway, let's put express aside. It's easy to create non-working setups with pci, today: - create 16 pci bridges - put one virtio device behind each boom Try it. I want to fix that. > > That's on x86. > > > > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > > > >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > >> claiming spec compliance. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Anthony Liguori > > > > Why do you bring this...

Hey Nels, I recently (within the last couple of days) updated the FAQ with fresh, up-to-date information. What achitectures are supported? cAos x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon CentOS-2 x86 only (sorry) CentOS-3 x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon Get it from the source here: http://caosity.org/index.php?option=faq&task=viewfaq&artid=3&Itemid=5 I was told that AMD64 would be supported "s...

Hello, here my achitecture: client1--Asterisk1----ser1---centile client2-- client1 do a call to centile. centile do a forward to client2 (Diversion) and then use the same CALL-ID! when asterisk1 receive the call with the same CALL-ID, it screen "Now forwarding SIP/XXXX -000002f6 to 'Local/MCDU at kamailio ' (th...

...s *breaks existing guests*. Any time the programming interfaces changes on a PCI device, the revision ID and/or device ID must change. The spec is very clear about this. We cannot disable the IO BAR without changing revision ID/device ID. > That's on x86. > > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is >> claiming spec compliance. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori > > Why do you bring this up? No one advocates any ABI breakage, >...

...t; > It's easy to create non-working setups with pci, today: > > - create 16 pci bridges > - put one virtio device behind each > > boom > > Try it. > > I want to fix that. > > >> > That's on x86. >> > >> > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. >> > >> >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is >> >> claiming spec compliance. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Anthony Liguori >> >...

Somehow one of our Xen servers ended up loaded with the i686 xen kernel, instead of the x86_64. The host has one windows VM running on it. The OS partition is file-based, but it also has a logical volume partition assigned for data. We would like to migrate the host server to a 64-bit kernel, which means moving the VM to one of our other 64-bit host servers. We tried simply copying the OS

Hey guys, I'm a new Ubuntu convert (installed through Wubi, and am blown away!) I'd love to get wine working so I play games etc, but I've got a lot of learning to do when it comes to installing and getting things working. So, I want to use the 1.0-rc1 version of wine, but CoD4 requires the 3dmark.diff patch. This is what I think I need to be doing: with the 3dmark.diff file

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:01:50PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:56:15AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> >> Rusty

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:01:50PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:56:15AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> >> Rusty

...t; > > > - create 16 pci bridges > > - put one virtio device behind each > > > > boom > > > > Try it. > > > > I want to fix that. > > > > > >> > That's on x86. > >> > > >> > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > >> > > >> >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > >> >> claiming spec compliance. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> &gt...

...t; > > > - create 16 pci bridges > > - put one virtio device behind each > > > > boom > > > > Try it. > > > > I want to fix that. > > > > > >> > That's on x86. > >> > > >> > Besides x86, there are achitectures where IO is unavailable or very slow. > >> > > >> >> I don't think we should rush an ABI breakage if the only benefit is > >> >> claiming spec compliance. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> &gt...